Comparable clinical outcomes and live births after single vitrified-warmed and fresh blastocyst transfer

被引:43
|
作者
Feng, Guixue [1 ]
Zhang, Bo [1 ]
Zhou, Hong [1 ]
Shu, Jinhui [1 ]
Gan, Xianyou [1 ]
Wu, Fangrong [1 ]
Deng, Xihe [1 ]
机构
[1] Maternal & Child Hlth Hosp Guangxi Zhuang Autonom, Reprod Med Ctr, Nanning 530003, Peoples R China
关键词
clinical pregnancy; implantation; single-blastocyst transfer; vitrification; DOUBLE-EMBRYO-TRANSFER; ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY; IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION; PREGNANCY RATES; TRANSFER CYCLES; VITRIFICATION; CRYOPRESERVATION; GESTATION; IMPLANTATION; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.07.008
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Selective single-blastocyst transfer (SBT) in fresh cycles has been effective in reducing multiple pregnancies. However, we do not know whether this successful strategy of fresh transfer cycles is suitable for cryopreserved cycles. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the feasibility and value of SBT in vitrified-warmed cycles. Clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) was similar with vitrified and fresh SBT (46.61% versus 52.15% respectively). Of the pregnant patients, monozygotic twin, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates were similar with vitrified and fresh SBT. For the newborns, no significant difference was observed in live birth, low birthweight, premature delivery and birth defects rates between vitrified and fresh SBT. With respect to the quality of transferred blastocysts (from BB to AA), a similar CPR and miscarriage rate was obtained for both vitrified and fresh SBT when a similar blastocyst cohort graded >= 3BB was transferred. The data show that vitrified SBT is an effective means of reducing multiple pregnancy and that comparable clinical outcomes and live births are achieved if single blastocysts graded >= 3BB are transferred for both vitrified and fresh SBT. These data should encourage clinics to evaluate their embryo transfer policy and adopt vitrified SBT as everyday practice. (C) 2012, Reproductive Healthcare Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:466 / 473
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perinatal outcomes after fresh versus vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer: retrospective analysis
    Ozgur, Kemal
    Berkkanoglu, Murat
    Bulut, Hasan
    Humaidan, Peter
    Coetzee, Kevin
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (04) : 899 - +
  • [2] Effect of morula pattern on clinical outcomes in single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer cycles
    Kwon, H. J.
    Cha, J. H.
    Kim, Y. J.
    Lee, S. K.
    Kim, J. H.
    Kim, D. H.
    Lee, J. H.
    Hur, G. H.
    Woo, S. M.
    Yoon, J. W.
    Lee, D. K.
    Kim, H. Y.
    Pak, K. A.
    Yoon, J. S.
    Park, S. Y.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2024, 39 : I301 - I301
  • [3] Association between the number of top-quality blastocysts and live births after single blastocyst transfer in the first fresh or vitrified-warmed IVF/ICSI cycle
    Xiong, Feng
    Sun, Qing
    Li, Guangui
    Yao, Zhihong
    Chen, Peilin
    Wan, Caiyun
    Zhong, Huixian
    Zeng, Yong
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2020, 40 (04) : 530 - 537
  • [4] Does sperm DNA fragmentation affect clinical outcomes during vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycles? A retrospective analysis of 2034 vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycles
    Zhang, Huan
    Li, Yan
    Wang, Haiqing
    Zhou, Wei
    Zheng, Yi
    Ye, Danna
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 2022, 39 (06) : 1359 - 1366
  • [5] Does sperm DNA fragmentation affect clinical outcomes during vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycles? A retrospective analysis of 2034 vitrified-warmed single-blastocyst transfer cycles
    Huan Zhang
    Yan Li
    Haiqing Wang
    Wei Zhou
    Yi Zheng
    Danna Ye
    [J]. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 2022, 39 : 1359 - 1366
  • [6] Noneffectiveness of cryostorage duration on clinical and neonatal outcomes after single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfers
    Baatarsuren, Mungunshagai
    Jamiyansuren, Jambaldorj
    Ganbaatar, Chinzorig
    Sengebaljir, Davaakhuu
    Erdenekhuyag, Belguune
    Enkhbaatar, Sandag
    Mungunsuvd, Namsrai
    Baljinnyam, Lkhagvasuren
    Tumur-Ochir, Ganjiguur
    Amarsaikhan, Ariunaa
    Dorjpurev, Amarjargal
    Ganbat, Gereltsetseg
    Boris, Tsogzolmaa
    Khangarid, Azjargal
    [J]. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01)
  • [7] The future of IVF: vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Knez, J.
    Kovacic, B.
    Reljic, M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 206 : 256 - 256
  • [8] Predictive value of serum HCG concentrations in pregnancies achieved after single fresh or vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer
    Oron, Galia
    Shavit, Tal
    Esh-Broder, Efrat
    Weon-Young, Son
    Tulandi, Togas
    Holzer, Hananel
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2017, 35 (03) : 272 - 278
  • [9] Blastocoele expansion degree predicts live birth after single blastocyst transfer for fresh and vitrified/warmed single blastocyst transfer cycles
    Du, Qing-Yun
    Wang, En-Yin
    Huang, Yan
    Guo, Xiao-Yi
    Xiong, Yu-Jing
    Yu, Yi-Ping
    Yao, Gui-Dong
    Shi, Sen-Lin
    Sun, Ying-Pu
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2016, 105 (04) : 910 - +
  • [10] Clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes after vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer are independent of cryostorage duration
    Maggiulli, R.
    Cimadomo, D.
    Dovere, L.
    Innocenti, F.
    Albricci, L.
    Soscia, D.
    Giancani, A.
    Sanges, F.
    Amendola, M. G.
    Tacconi, L.
    Nastri, G.
    Morgante, V.
    Vaiarelli, A.
    Ubaldi, F.
    Rienzi, L.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2021, 36 : 23 - 23