Do predictions from Species Sensitivity Distributions match with field data?

被引:45
|
作者
Smetanova, S. [1 ]
Blaha, L. [1 ]
Liess, M. [2 ]
Schaefer, R. B. [3 ]
Beketov, M. A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Masaryk Univ, Fac Sci, RECETOX, Brno 62500, Czech Republic
[2] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Syst Ecotoxicol, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
[3] Univ Koblenz Landau, Inst Environm Sci, D-76829 Landau, Germany
关键词
Pollution; Risk assessment; Freshwater; Rivers; Statistical modelling; ECOLOGICAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; INVERTEBRATE COMMUNITIES; PESTICIDES; TOLERANCE; EXPOSURE; WATER; MACROINVERTEBRATES; TOXICITY; BIODIVERSITY; RELEVANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.envpol.2014.03.002
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Species Sensitivity Distribution (SSD) is a statistical model that can be used to predict effects of contaminants on biological communities, but only few comparisons of this model with field studies have been conducted so far. In the present study we used measured pesticides concentrations from streams in Germany, France, and Finland, and we used SSD to calculate msPAF (multiple substance potentially affected fraction) values based on maximum toxic stress at localities. We compared these SSD-based predictions with the actual effects on stream invertebrates quantified by the SPEAR(pesticides) . The results show that the msPAFs correlated well with the bioindicator, however, the generally accepted SSD threshold msPAF of 0.05 (5% of species are predicted to be affected) severely underestimated the observed effects (msPAF values causing significant effects are 2-1000-times lower). These results demonstrate that validation with field data is required to define the appropriate thresholds for SSD predictions. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:126 / 133
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Why sparrow distributions do not match model predictions
    Jenkins, CN
    Powell, RD
    Bass, OL
    Pimm, SL
    ANIMAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 6 : 39 - 46
  • [2] The effects of model and data complexity on predictions from species distributions models
    Garcia-Callejas, David
    Araujo, Miguel B.
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2016, 326 : 4 - 12
  • [3] Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice
    Wheeler, JR
    Grist, EPM
    Leung, KMY
    Morritt, D
    Crane, M
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2002, 45 (1-12) : 192 - 202
  • [4] Can We Reasonably Predict Chronic Species Sensitivity Distributions from Acute Species Sensitivity Distributions?
    Hiki, Kyoshiro
    Iwasaki, Yuichi
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 54 (20) : 13131 - 13136
  • [5] Deriving sediment quality guidelines from field-based species sensitivity distributions
    Leung, KMY
    Bjorgesæter, A
    Gray, JS
    Li, WK
    Lui, GCS
    Wang, Y
    Lam, PKS
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 39 (14) : 5148 - 5156
  • [6] Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA
    Wang, Xiaonan
    Yan, Zhenguang
    Liu, Zhengtao
    Zhang, Cong
    Wang, Weili
    Li, Handong
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 21 (01) : 168 - 176
  • [7] Comparison of species sensitivity distributions for species from China and the USA
    Xiaonan Wang
    Zhenguang Yan
    Zhengtao Liu
    Cong Zhang
    Weili Wang
    Handong Li
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2014, 21 : 168 - 176
  • [8] Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions
    Duboudin, C
    Ciffroy, P
    Magaud, H
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2004, 23 (02) : 489 - 499
  • [9] Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology
    Travis, C
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2003, 23 (02) : 425 - 426
  • [10] On the quantification of intertest variability in ecotoxicity data with application to species sensitivity distributions
    Hickey, Graeme L.
    Craig, Peter S.
    Luttik, Robert
    de Zwart, Dick
    ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2012, 31 (08) : 1903 - 1910