Does China's Yangtze River Economic Belt policy impact on local ecosystem services?

被引:78
|
作者
Luo, Qiaoling [1 ]
Luo, Yanlong [1 ]
Zhou, Qingfeng [2 ,3 ]
Song, Yan [4 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Urban Design, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Harbin Inst Technol, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Shenzhen Key Lab Urban Planning & Decis Making, Shenzhen 518055, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept City & Reg Planning, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Yangtze River Economic Belt; Ecosystem services; Spatiotemporal variation; Value; Policy; LAND-USE; FORESTS; BASIN; TEXAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.135
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The ecological protection of the Yangtze River Economic Belt (YREB) is one part of China's national strategy, and to identify the spatiotemporal variation of ecosystem service values (ESV) and examine the YREB policies performances can provide effective knowledge and supports for making ecological protection policies. In this paper, the ESV of YREB's 11 units were measured based on equivalent factor value method. Panal data and regression discontinuity model were used to discuss the impact of the ecological protection policies issued 2012 and 2014 on the ESVs. The results showed that: (1) From 2009 to 2016, the total ESVs of the YREB increased from 617.49 billion USD to 844.84 billion USD, showing a pattern of slow increase (2009-2012), substantial growth (2012-2014) and stability of high level (2014-2016). Forestland and water body were the key types of land to ecological protection. For the average of all measured years, the two lands accounted for 43.24% of total ecological land and provided 82.36% of total ESVs;(2) Generally, all the units were closely related to the ecological protection policy and were positively affected. In the first period (2009-2012), the ESVs of 11 units had three statuses: declined, kept steady and moderately increased. After strong policy implementation, all units rose sharply (2012-2014) and maintained a steady increase at a high level (2014-2016); (3) Ecological protection policies have a significant positive effect on the ESVs. The policy in 2012 suppressed the downward trend of ESVs increase and the policy in 2014 had a positive impact to increase ESVs. This study proved that possible to achieve a win-win situation of urban development and ecological environmental protection by implementing ecological protection policies. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 241
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Li, Zihui
    Guan, Dongjie
    Zhou, Lilei
    Zhang, Yanjun
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2022, 29 (09) : 12484 - 12505
  • [2] Constraint relationship of ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zihui Li
    Dongjie Guan
    Lilei Zhou
    Yanjun Zhang
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2022, 29 : 12484 - 12505
  • [3] Exploring the Response of Ecosystem Services to Socioecological Factors in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Zhang, Zhiming
    Fang, Fengman
    Yao, Youru
    Ji, Qing
    Cheng, Xiaojing
    LAND, 2024, 13 (06)
  • [4] Forecast of policy-driven land use change and its impact on ecosystem services in China: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Haofei
    Zhou, Xiuhui
    INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 19 (06) : 1473 - 1484
  • [5] The spatial spillover effects of ecosystem services: A case study in Yangtze River economic belt in China
    Qu, Hongjiao
    You, Chang
    Feng, Chen-Chieh
    Guo, Luo
    Ecological Indicators, 2024, 168
  • [6] Strengthening the effectiveness of nature reserves in representing ecosystem services: The Yangtze River Economic Belt in China
    Xu, Xibao
    Jiang, Bo
    Chen, Minkun
    Bai, Yang
    Yang, Guishan
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 96
  • [7] Ecosystem services trade-offs and determinants in China's Yangtze River Economic Belt from 2000 to 2015
    Xu, Xibao
    Yang, Guishan
    Tan, Yan
    Liu, Jingping
    Hu, Huizhi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 634 : 1601 - 1614
  • [8] Exploring the interrelations and driving factors among typical ecosystem services in the Yangtze river economic Belt, China
    He, Liujie
    Xie, Zeyang
    Wu, Hanqing
    Liu, Zhong
    Zheng, Bofu
    Wan, Wei
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 351
  • [9] Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China
    Jiang, Yanan
    Guan, Dongjie
    He, Xiujuan
    Yin, Boling
    Zhou, Lilei
    Sun, Lingli
    Huang, Danan
    Li, Zihui
    Zhang, Yanjun
    LAND USE POLICY, 2022, 114
  • [10] Interactions between Ecosystem Services and Social Economies in the Yangtze River Economic Belt
    Wang, Wei
    Wang, Haofei
    Yang, Guishan
    Zhou, Xiuhui
    ADVANCED SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS, 2023, 7 (03)