Data collection mode effect on feeling thermometer questions: A comparison of face-to-face and Web surveys

被引:28
|
作者
Liu, Mingnan [1 ]
Wang, Yichen [2 ]
机构
[1] SurveyMonkey, Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA
[2] NERA Econ Consulting, San Francisco, CA 94111 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Fact-to-face interview; Web survey; Feeling thermometer; Data collection mode effect; PARTY IDENTIFICATION; RESPONSE PATTERNS; INTERNET; TELEPHONE; ATTITUDES; QUALITY; SAMPLES;
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.057
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Feeling thermometer questions are widely used in political science research to estimate people's attitudes and feelings toward a political object, like a political figure or an organization. Given the popularity of the feeling thermometer question in population surveys, more work is needed to explore the measurement of this question type. This study examines the data collection mode effect on feeling thermometers. Using the 2012 American National Election Studies, we find that the measurement of feeling thermometers is not exactly comparable between face-to-face and Web surveys. Face-to-face respondents tend to provide warmer feelings, while Web respondents give relatively more reliable responses in comparison. In both survey modes, respondents are most likely to select the response options that are verbally labeled although the effect is more striking in face-to-face than Web survey. The item nonresponse between these two modes does not differ in a meaningful way. This study ends by discussing future research directions on feeling thermometer questions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:212 / 218
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Data collection mode differences between national face-to-face and web surveys on gender inequality and discrimination questions
    Liu, Mingnan
    WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2017, 60 : 11 - 16
  • [2] A Comparison of the Quality of Questions in a Face-to-face and a Web Survey
    Revilla, Melanie A.
    Saris, Willem E.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2013, 25 (02) : 242 - 253
  • [3] Comparison of Face-to-Face and Web Surveys on the Topic of Homosexual Rights
    Liu, Mingnan
    Wang, Yichen
    JOURNAL OF HOMOSEXUALITY, 2016, 63 (06) : 838 - 854
  • [4] Sample designs and estimators for multimode surveys with face-to-face data collection
    Brick, J. Michael
    Dematteis, Jill M.
    SURVEY METHODOLOGY, 2023, 49 (02)
  • [5] Unit Response and Costs in Web Versus Face-To-Face Data Collection: Comparison of Two Cross-sectional Health Surveys
    Braekman, Elise
    Demarest, Stefaan
    Charafeddine, Rana
    Drieskens, Sabine
    Berete, Finaba
    Gisle, Lydia
    Van der Heyden, Johan
    Van Hal, Guido
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [6] Multi-Mode Face-to-Face and Telephone Approach to Data Collection in Health Surveys: A Scoping Review
    Guerra, Paulo Henrique
    Sposito, Leticia Aparecida Calderao
    Umpierre, Daniel
    Florindo, Alex Antonio
    EPIDEMIOLOGIA, 2024, 5 (04): : 796 - 804
  • [7] MODE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN FACE-TO-FACE AND WEB SURVEYS: AN EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION OF DATA QUALITY AND SOCIAL DESIRABILITY EFFECTS
    Heerwegh, Dirk
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2009, 21 (01) : 111 - 121
  • [8] The Effects of Interviewers on the Collection of Reasons for Refusals in Face-to-Face Surveys
    Menold, Natalja
    Zuell, Cornelia
    METHODOLOGY-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RESEARCH METHODS FOR THE BEHAVIORAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 2016, 12 (02) : 52 - 60
  • [9] Suggestions for the Standardized Collection of Reasons for Refusals in Face-to-Face Surveys
    Menold, Natalja
    Zuell, Cornelia
    METHODS DATA ANALYSES, 2011, 5 (01): : 91 - 108
  • [10] Combining web and face-to-face in travel surveys: comparability challenges?
    Caroline Bayart
    Patrick Bonnel
    Transportation, 2012, 39 : 1147 - 1171