Impact of systematic evaluation of pain and agitation in an intensive care unit

被引:357
|
作者
Chanques, G [1 ]
Jaber, S
Barbotte, E
Violet, S
Sebbane, M
Perrigault, PF
Mann, C
Lefrant, JY
Eledjam, JJ
机构
[1] Montpellier Univ Hosp, St Eloi Hosp, Intens Care & Anesthesiol Dept B, DAR B, Montpellier 5, France
[2] Montpellier Univ Hosp, Arnaud Villeneuve Hosp, Dept Med Stat, Montpellier 5, France
关键词
pain; analgesia; agitation; sedation; intensive care unit; practice guidelines;
D O I
10.1097/01.CCM.0000218416.62457.56
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To measure the impact of implementation of the systematic evaluation of pain and agitation by nurses using the Behavioral Pain Scale (BPS), the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) for pain, and the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) associated with medical staff education in analgesia and sedation management in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Design: Two-phase, prospective, controlled study. Setting: Twelve-bed medical-surgical ICU in a university hospital. Patients: Consecutive patients staying > 24 hrs in ICU. Interventions: BPS, NRS, and RASS were measured twice daily, at rest, by independent observers during 21 wks (control group) and after 4 wks of training, by nurses during 29 wks (intervention group). In the intervention group, the treating physician was alerted in case of pain defined by BPS > 5 or NRS > 3 or in case of agitation defined by RASS > 1. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 230 patients were included (control group, n = 100; intervention group, n = 130). Baseline characteristics were not significantly different. The incidence of pain and agitation decreased significantly in the intervention group: 63% vs. 42% (p =.002) and 29% vs. 12% (p =.002), respectively. Rate of severe pain and agitation events defined by NRS > 6 and RASS > 2, respectively, also decreased significantly. There were significantly more therapeutic changes in the intervention group in the way of an escalation but also in the way of a de-escalation for analgesic and psychoactive drugs. Compared with the control group, there was a marked decrease in the duration of mechanical ventilation (120 [interquartile range 48-312] vs. 65 (24-192) hrs, p =.01) and nosocomial infections rate (17% vs. 8%, p <.05) in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in median length of stay (9 [4, 15] vs. 7 [4, 13] days) and mortality in ICU (12 vs. 15%). Conclusions: Systematic evaluation of pain and agitation, and analgesics and sedatives need was associated with a decrease in incidence of pain and agitation, duration of mechanical ventilation and nosocomial infections.
引用
收藏
页码:1691 / 1699
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact Of Pharmaceutical Care On Treatment Of Pain And Agitation In Medical Intensive Care Unit
    Dilokpattanamongkol, P.
    Suansanae, T.
    Suthisisang, C.
    Morakul, S.
    Karnjanarachata, C.
    Tangsujaritvijit, V.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2016, 193
  • [2] Impact of pharmaceutical care on pain and agitation in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand
    Pitchaya Dilokpattanamongkol
    Viratch Tangsujaritvijit
    Thanarat Suansanae
    Chuthamanee Suthisisang
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2017, 39 : 573 - 581
  • [3] Impact of pharmaceutical care on pain and agitation in a medical intensive care unit in Thailand
    Dilokpattanamongkol, Pitchaya
    Tangsujaritvijit, Viratch
    Suansanae, Thanarat
    Suthisisang, Chuthamanee
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2017, 39 (03) : 573 - 581
  • [4] Pain, agitation and delirium in the intensive care unit
    McGovern, Christopher
    Cowan, Richard
    Appleton, Richard
    Miles, Barbara
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (12): : 634 - 640
  • [5] Pain, agitation and delirium in the intensive care unit
    McGovern, Christopher
    Cowan, Richard
    Appleton, Richard
    Miles, Barbara
    ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2021, 22 (12): : 799 - 806
  • [6] EVALUATION OF A PAIN, AGITATION, AND DELIRIUM PROTOCOL IN A MEDICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Chambers, Lauren
    Frock, Karen
    Simcoe, Brenna
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (01) : 464 - 464
  • [7] Impact of a nurse engagement intervention on pain, agitation and delirium assessment in a community intensive care unit
    Tan, Carolyn M.
    Camargo, Mercedes
    Miller, Franziska
    Ross, Katie
    Maximous, Ramez
    Yung, Priscilla
    Marshall, Carl
    Fleming, Dimitra
    Law, Madelyn
    Tsang, Jennifer L. Y.
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2019, 8 (03)
  • [8] Occurrence and Practices for Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Intensive Care Unit Patients
    Arroyo-Novoa, Carmen Mabel
    Figueroa-Ramos, Milagros, I
    Puntillo, Kathleen A.
    PUERTO RICO HEALTH SCIENCES JOURNAL, 2019, 38 (03) : 156 - 162
  • [9] EVALUATION OF QUETIAPINE FOR TREATMENT OF AGITATION IN THE SURGICAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT
    Holt, Tara
    Abraham, Prasad
    Perez, Sebastian
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 40 (12) : U297 - U297
  • [10] Nonpharmacological interventions for agitation in the adult intensive care unit: A systematic review
    Adams, Anne Mette N.
    Chamberlain, Diane
    Gronkjaer, Mette
    Thorup, Charlotte Brun
    Conroy, Tiffany
    AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (03) : 385 - 400