Estimating minimum period of time to perform prostate MRI after prostate biopsy: Clinical and histological bleeding risk factors; from a prospective study

被引:4
|
作者
Sarradin, M. [1 ]
Lepiney, C. [2 ]
Celhay, O. [1 ]
Delpech, P. O. [1 ]
Charles, T. [1 ]
Pillot, P. [1 ]
Bernardeau, S. [1 ]
Tasu, J. P. [2 ]
Irani, J. [3 ]
机构
[1] CHU Poitiers, Serv Urol, 2 Rue Mil, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[2] CHU Poitiers, Serv Imagerie Med, 2 Rue Mil, F-86021 Poitiers, France
[3] CHU Kremlin Bicetre, Serv Urol, 78 Rue Gen Leclerc, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
来源
PROGRES EN UROLOGIE | 2018年 / 28卷 / 02期
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; Magnetic resonance imaging; Biopsy; Hemorrhage; MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI; POSTBIOPSY HEMORRHAGE; CANCER; TUMOR; IMAGES; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.purol.2017.11.006
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
A minimum delay of 4 to 6 weeks between biopsy and multiparametric prostatic MRI (mpMRI) is admitted due to post-biopsy hemorrhage that can impact MRI reading without strong scientific evidence. The objective of the study was to evaluate the best period between prostate biopsy and 3Tesla mpMRI and searching for predictive factors of intraprostatic blood. Method. - A prostate biopsy followed by a 4-week prostate MRI (MRIp M1) was performed. In case of hemorrhage, MRI was rescheduled at 8 and 12 weeks (M2/M3). We analyzed the persistant bleeding to identify risk factors: anticoagulant/antiaggregant, post-biopsy side effects, histological criteria. Results. - In this prospective, single-center study, we included 40 patients followed for suspected prostate cancer between December 2014 and March 2016. At the MRIpM1, blood was found for 97.5 % of the patients. The rates were 90.9 % and 88.9 % respectively at the M2 and M3 mpMRI. Compared to initial blood volume on MRIpM1, a significant decrease in blood volume was observed between M1 and M2 (55 %; P = 0.0091). We showed a 75 % decrease between M1 and M3 (P = 0.0003). Low urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggesting urinary infection at 4 weeks were significantly correlated with blood volume on MRIpM1 (P = 0.0063). The blood volume was higher in case of unconformity between biopsy and mpMRI results for detection of significant tumors (11.3 vs. 2.3; P = 0.0051). Conclusions. - A minimum of 8-week biopsy and mpMRI period would limit post-biopsy hemorrhage, predicted by LUTS suggesting urinary infection. A delay of 12 weeks would be optimal without delaying the management of the patient. (C) 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study
    Bratan, Flavie
    Niaf, Emilie
    Melodelima, Christelle
    Chesnais, Anne Laure
    Souchon, Remi
    Mege-Lechevallier, Florence
    Colombel, Marc
    Rouviere, Olivier
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2013, 23 (07) : 2019 - 2029
  • [2] Influence of imaging and histological factors on prostate cancer detection and localisation on multiparametric MRI: a prospective study
    Flavie Bratan
    Emilie Niaf
    Christelle Melodelima
    Anne Laure Chesnais
    Rémi Souchon
    Florence Mège-Lechevallier
    Marc Colombel
    Olivier Rouvière
    European Radiology, 2013, 23 : 2019 - 2029
  • [3] Prevalence and risk factors for incidental prostate cancer in patients after transurethral resection of the prostate with negative results on prostate biopsy: A retrospective study
    Guo, Zhenlang
    He, Junwei
    Pan, Jun
    Huang, Lijuan
    Cao, Jiadong
    Bai, Zunguang
    Wang, Shusheng
    Xiang, Songtao
    Gu, Chiming
    Wang, Zhaohui
    INVESTIGATIVE AND CLINICAL UROLOGY, 2022, 63 (02) : 201 - 206
  • [4] STANDARD PROSTATE BIOPSY VERSUS MRI-FUSION BIOPSY: RESULTS AFTER TWO YEARS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Manfredi, Matteo
    De Luca, Stefano
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Garrou, Diletta
    Cattaneo, Giovanni
    Amparore, Daniele
    Bollito, Enrico
    Russo, Filippo
    Gned, Dario
    De Pascale, Agostino
    Cirillo, Stefano
    Fiori, Cristian
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2017, 37 (04) : 2148 - 2148
  • [5] Risk Factors for Infection After Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Population-based Register Study
    Ortegren, Joakim
    Kohestani, Kimia
    Elvstam, Olof
    Janson, Hakan
    Aberg, Daniel
    Kjolhede, Henrik
    Kahlmeter, Gunnar
    Bratt, Ola
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY OPEN SCIENCE, 2024, 67 : 1 - 6
  • [6] What factors influence pain during prostate biopsy? Results from a randomized, prospective clinical trial
    Mynderse, L.
    Mclaren, R.
    Ashley, R.
    Routh, J.
    Krambeck, A.
    Siddiqui, S.
    Gettman, M.
    Blute, M.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 101 : 15 - 15
  • [7] MRI, PCA3, OR PHI TO PREDICT PROSTATE CANCER AFTER AN INITIAL NEGATIVE BIOPSY? RESULTS OF A PROSPECTIVE STUDY
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    Russo, Filippo
    Manfredi, Matteo
    Mele, Fabrizio
    Poggio, Massimiliano
    Grande, Susanna
    Fiori, Cristian
    Bollito, Enrico
    Papotti, Mauro
    Molineris, Ivan
    Regge, Daniele
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E819 - E820
  • [8] Biases in Recommendations for and Acceptance of Prostate Biopsy Significantly Affect Assessment of Prostate Cancer Risk Factors: Results From Two Large Randomized Clinical Trials
    Tangen, Catherine M.
    Goodman, Phyllis J.
    Till, Cathee
    Schenk, Jeannette M.
    Lucia, M. Scott
    Thompson, Ian M., Jr.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (36) : 4338 - +
  • [9] Risk of repeat biopsy and prostate cancer detection after an initial extended negative biopsy: longitudinal follow-up from a prospective trial
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Nicolaiew, Nathalie
    Marchand, Charles
    Terry, Stephane
    Allory, Yves
    Vacherot, Francis
    Abbou, Claude-Clement
    Salomon, Laurent
    de la Taille, Alexandre
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (06) : 988 - 996
  • [10] Risk factors for acute urinary retention requiring temporary intermittent catheterization after prostate brachytherapy: A prospective study
    Locke, J
    Ellis, W
    Cavanagh, W
    Wallner, K
    Blasko, J
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 281 - 281