Utilization of digital-alghoritmic design tools in architectural basic design education

被引:4
|
作者
Yavuz, Arzu Ozen [1 ]
Yildirim, Tayfun [1 ]
机构
[1] Gazi Univ, Fac Architecture, Dept Architecture, TR-06570 Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Architectural design; basic design principles; basic design education; algorithmic design;
D O I
10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.08.164
中图分类号
J [艺术];
学科分类号
13 ; 1301 ;
摘要
Basic design education is the first step of architectural design education. Basic design principles based on Gestalt psychology and Bauhaus school are the body of rules which are necessary to establish the compositional organization. Students are not able define the principles establishing the geometrical correlation. At this stage, teachers are expected to guide their students. For that purpose, user-participated "artificial intelligence" software is written solving the previously defined problems. Algorithms to produce two or three dimensional compositions with 3D Max Script are developed. As a result, during the basic design education, algorithmic rules set is regarded as beneficial materials for CAD softwares set in according to basic design principles, producing a new design, creating alternatives and visualization. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer review under responsibility of Prof. Ayse Cakir Ilhan
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 310
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Study on Defining Utilization Steps of Tradiational and Digital Tools in Architectural Design Education
    Yavuz, Arzu Ozen
    Yildirim, M. Tayfun
    [J]. WORLD CONFERENCE ON DESIGN, ARTS AND EDUCATION (DAE-2012), 2012, 51 : 239 - 243
  • [2] Basic design in architectural education in Turkey
    Makakli, Elif Suyuk
    Ozker, Serpil
    [J]. ERPA INTERNATIONAL CONGRESSES ON EDUCATION 2015 (ERPA 2015), 2016, 26
  • [3] Basic design dilemmas in architectural education
    Asasoglu, Ali
    Gur, Sengul Oymen
    Erol, Sengul Yalcinkaya
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH AND ESSAYS, 2010, 5 (22): : 3538 - 3549
  • [4] Digital Design Tools versus Architectural Representation and Design Approach A reading off architectural press
    Orbey, Betul
    Gurel, Nihan
    [J]. ECAADE 2013: COMPUTATION AND PERFORMANCE, VOL 2, 2013, : 415 - 423
  • [5] DIGITAL TECHNIQUES, DESIGN AND PRODUCTION IN ARCHITECTURAL EDUCATION
    Stojakovic, Vesna
    Tepavcevic, Bojan
    Malbasa, Vuk
    [J]. INTED2016: 10TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2016, : 6101 - 6108
  • [6] UTILISING DIGITAL DESIGN AND RAPID PROTOTYPING TOOLS IN DESIGN EDUCATION
    Gu, Ning
    Jones, Wyn M.
    Williams, Anthony
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER-AIDED ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN RESEARCH IN ASIA (CAADRIA 2010): NEW FRONTIERS, 2010, : 249 - 258
  • [7] The contribution of digital tools to architectural design studio: A case study
    Ceylan, Salih
    Sahin, Pinar
    Secmen, Serengul
    Somer, Melek Elif
    Suher, Hasan Kemal
    [J]. AIN SHAMS ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (07)
  • [8] Computational Design in Distributed Teamwork Using digital and non-digital tools in architectural design competitions
    Altintas, Livanur Erbil
    Kasali, Altug
    Dogan, Fehmi
    [J]. ECAADE SIGRADI 2019: ARCHITECTURE IN THE AGE OF THE 4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION, VOL 1, 2019, : 333 - 340
  • [9] Exploring learning objectives for digital design in architectural education
    Doyle, Shelby E.
    Senske, Nick
    [J]. ARCHITECTURAL RESEARCH ADDRESSING SOCIETAL CHALLENGES, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2017, : 977 - 982
  • [10] Representation in architectural design tools
    O'Reilly, UM
    Testa, P
    [J]. EVOLUTIONARY DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE, 2000, : 137 - 148