Frequency selectivity of contralateral residual acoustic hearing in bimodal cochlear implant users, and limitations on the ability to match the pitch of electric and acoustic stimuli

被引:17
|
作者
Green, Tim [1 ]
Faulkner, Andrew [1 ]
Rosen, Stuart [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, London WC1N 1PF, England
关键词
Cochlear implant; bimodal hearing; frequency selectivity; SPEECH RECOGNITION; FUNDAMENTAL-FREQUENCY; OPPOSITE EARS; PERCEPTION; BENEFIT; ADULTS; PLACE; NOISE; AIDS; ADAPTATION;
D O I
10.3109/14992027.2011.642010
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the reliability of across-ear, acoustic-electric pitch/timbre comparisons for determining effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Study sample: Nine CI users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing. Design: Absolute acoustic thresholds in the unimplanted ear were measured and frequency selectivity was assessed via psychophysical tuning curves. An adjustment method was used to match the percepts elicited by pulse trains on individual electrodes with various acoustic signals (pure tones, narrow-band noises, and bandpass filtered pulse trains). The starting frequency of the acoustic signal was roved and matches were obtained at different loudness levels. Results: Acoustic frequency selectivity varied widely. Two subjects showed clear evidence of frequency selectivity extending above 500 Hz. Only these subjects produced consistent pitch matches over repeated measurements. For other subjects, the acoustic frequency eventually selected tended to correlate with the initially presented frequency. There was limited evidence of level effects and these were inconsistent across subjects and electrodes. Conclusions: Across-modality pitch/timbre matching appears unlikely to provide a generally applicable method for determining the effective characteristic frequencies of cochlear implant electrodes. Frequency selectivity above 500 Hz may be necessary for consistent pitch/timbre matches.
引用
收藏
页码:389 / 398
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Multidimensional scaling between acoustic and electric stimuli in cochlear implant users with contralateral hearing
    Vermeire, Katrien
    Landsberger, David M.
    Schleich, Peter
    Van de Heyning, Paul H.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 306 : 29 - 36
  • [2] Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing
    Yang, Hsin-I
    Zeng, Fan-Gang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 : S17 - S22
  • [3] Acoustic to Electric Pitch Comparisons in Cochlear Implant Subjects with Residual Hearing
    Colette Boëx
    Lionel Baud
    Grégoire Cosendai
    Alain Sigrist
    Maria-Izabel Kós
    Marco Pelizzone
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2006, 7 : 110 - 124
  • [4] Acoustic to electric pitch comparisons in cochlear implant subjects with residual hearing
    Boëx, Colette
    Baud, Lionel
    Cosendai, Grégoire
    Sigrist, Alain
    Kós, Maria-Izabel
    Pelizzone, Marco
    JARO-JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR RESEARCH IN OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2006, 7 (02): : 110 - 124
  • [5] Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing
    Tan, Chin-Tuan
    Martin, Brett
    Svirsky, Mario A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 28 (03) : 187 - 199
  • [6] Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing
    Visram, Anisa S.
    Azadpour, Mahan
    Kluk, Karolina
    McKay, Colette M.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2012, 131 (05): : 4042 - 4050
  • [7] Electric-acoustic forward masking in cochlear implant users with ipsilateral residual hearing
    Imsiecke, Marina
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Lenarz, Thomas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 364 : 25 - 37
  • [8] Simultaneous masking between electric and acoustic stimulation in cochlear implant users with residual low-frequency hearing
    Krueger, Benjamin
    Buechner, Andreas
    Nogueira, Waldo
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2017, 353 : 185 - 196
  • [9] Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Acoustic Hearing: A Systematic Review
    Kim, Jeong-Seo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 13
  • [10] Pitch Comparisons between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Normal-hearing Contralateral Ear
    Robert P. Carlyon
    Olivier Macherey
    Johan H. M. Frijns
    Patrick R. Axon
    Randy K. Kalkman
    Patrick Boyle
    David M. Baguley
    John Briggs
    John M. Deeks
    Jeroen J. Briaire
    Xavier Barreau
    René Dauman
    Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2010, 11 : 625 - 640