IV paracetamol effect on propofol-ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL

被引:3
|
作者
Eker, H. Evren [1 ]
Cok, Oya Yalcin [1 ]
Ergenoglu, Pinar [1 ]
Aribogan, Anis [1 ]
Arslan, Gulnaz [1 ]
机构
[1] Baskent Univ, Dept Anaesthesiol, TR-01250 Yuregir Adana, Turkey
关键词
ESWL; Propofol; Ketamine; Paracetamol; PROCEDURAL SEDATION; COMBINATION; ANALGESIA; MECHANISM;
D O I
10.1007/s00540-012-1335-4
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) is a painful procedure performed with sedoanalgesia in paediatric patients. The propofol-ketamine combination may be the preferable anaesthesia for this procedure, and propofol-ketamine consumption may be decreased with the administration of intravenous (IV) paracetamol. In this study we investigated the effect of IV paracetamol administration on propofol-ketamine consumption, recovery time and frequency of adverse events in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL. Sixty children, ranging in age from 1 to 10 years and with American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status 1-2, were included in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Thirty minutes prior to the procedure children randomly assigned to Group I received IV 15 mg/kg paracetamol, and those randomly assigned to Group II received 1.5 mL/kg IV saline infusion 30 min. The propofol-ketamine combination was prepared by mixing 25 mg propofol and 25 mg ketamine in a total 10 mL solution in the same syringe. After the administration of 0.1 mg/kg midazolam and 10 mu g/kg atropine to both groups and during the procedure, the propofol-ketamine combination was administered at 0.5 mg/kg doses to achieve a Wisconsin sedation score of 1 or 2. Oxygen saturation and heart rate were recorded at 5-min intervals. Propofol-ketamine consumption, recovery times and adverse events were also recorded. Demographic data were similar between groups. Propofol-ketamine consumption (Group I, 25.2 +/- A 17.7 mg; Group II, 35.4 +/- A 20.1 mg; p = 0.04) and recovery times (Group I, 19.4 +/- A 7.9 min; Group II, 29.6 +/- A 11.4 min; p < 0.0001) were significantly different between groups. Saturation, heart rate and adverse events were similar in both groups. Our data suggest that the administration of IV paracetamol decreases propofol-ketamine consumption for adequate sedation during ESWL procedures in paediatric patients and shortens recovery time.
引用
收藏
页码:351 / 356
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] IV paracetamol effect on propofol–ketamine consumption in paediatric patients undergoing ESWL
    H. Evren Eker
    Oya Yalçin Çok
    Pınar Ergenoğlu
    Anış Ariboğan
    Gülnaz Arslan
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2012, 26 : 351 - 356
  • [2] Propofol and propofol-ketamine in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization
    Akin, A
    Esmaoglu, A
    Guler, G
    Demircioglu, R
    Narin, N
    Boyaci, A
    PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (05) : 553 - 557
  • [3] Propofol-ketamine mixture for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization
    Kogan, A
    Efrat, R
    Katz, J
    Vidne, BA
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2003, 17 (06) : 691 - 693
  • [4] Comparison of propofol with propofol-ketamine combination in pediatric patients undergoing auditory brainstem response testing
    Akin, A
    Esmaoglu, A
    Town, Z
    Gulcu, N
    Aydogan, H
    Boyaci, A
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2005, 69 (11) : 1541 - 1545
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine-ketamine and propofol-ketamine combinations for anesthesia in spontaneously breathing pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization
    Tosun, Zeynep
    Akin, Aynur
    Guler, Gulen
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Boyaci, Adern
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2006, 20 (04) : 515 - 519
  • [6] Comparison of propofol-ketamine and propofol-fentanyl combinations for sedation in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized clinical trial
    Falcao, Milena Vasconcelos
    Neto, Joao Nogueira
    Moura, Ed Carlos Rey
    Oliveira, Caio Marcio Barros
    Diniz, Rodrigo Pinto
    Dibai-Filho, Almir Vieira
    Leal, Plinio da Cunha
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (01):
  • [7] Remifentanil-ketamine vs. propofol-ketamine for sedation in pediatric patients undergoing colonoscopy: A randomized clinical trial
    Karacaer, Feride
    Biricik, Ebru
    Ilginel, Murat
    Kucukbingoz, Cagatay
    Agin, Mehmet
    Tumgor, Gokhan
    Gunes, Yasemin
    Ozcengiz, Dilek
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2018, 68 (06): : 597 - 604
  • [8] Propofol-ketamine vs propofol-fentanyl combinations for deep sedation and analgesia in pediatric patients undergoing burn dressing changes
    Tosun, Zeynep
    Esmaoglu, Aliye
    Coruh, Atilla
    PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIA, 2008, 18 (01) : 43 - 47
  • [9] Propofol-fentanyl versus propofol-ketamine for procedural sedation and analgesia in patients with trauma
    Aminiahidashti, Hamed
    Shafiee, Sajad
    Hosseininejad, Seyed Mohammad
    Firouzian, Abulfazl
    Barzegarnejad, Ayyub
    Kiasari, Alieh Zamani
    Kerigh, Behzad Feizzadeh
    Bozorgi, Farzad
    Shafizad, Misagh
    Geraeeli, Ahmad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2018, 36 (10): : 1766 - 1770
  • [10] A comparison between the effects of propofol-fentanyl with propofol-ketamine for sedation in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography outside the operating room
    Akhondzadeh, Reza
    Ghomeishi, Ali
    Nesioonpour, Sholeh
    Nourizade, Sanaz
    BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 39 (02) : 145 - 149