Comparison of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy and Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Intrahepatic Metastases

被引:68
|
作者
Jackson, William C. [1 ]
Tao, Yebin [1 ]
Mendiratta-Lala, Mishal [2 ]
Bazzi, Latifa [1 ]
Wahl, Dan R. [1 ]
Schipper, Matthew J. [1 ]
Feng, Mary [3 ]
Cuneo, Kyle C. [1 ]
Lawrence, Theodore S. [1 ]
Owen, Dawn [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiat Oncol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Dept Radiol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA USA
关键词
COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASES; HEPATIC METASTASES; PHASE-I; CANCER; TRIAL; OUTCOMES; RADIOTHERAPY; RESECTION; SURVIVAL; CURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.12.014
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are widely used therapies for the treatment of intrahepatic metastases; however, direct comparisons are lacking. We sought to compare outcomes for these 2 modalities. Methods and Materials: From 2000 to 2015, 161 patients with 282 pathologically diagnosed unresectable liver metastases were treated with RFA (n = 112) or SBRT (n = 170) at a single institution. The primary outcome was freedom from local progression (FFLP). The effect of treatment and covariates on FFLP was modeled using a mixed-effects Cox model with application of inverse probability treatment weighting to adjust for potential imbalances in treatment modality. Results: The median follow-up period was 24.6 months. Patients receiving SBRT had larger tumors than those treated with RFA (median, 2.7 cm vs 1.8 cm; P < .01). On univariate analysis, tumor size was associated with worse FFLP for RFA(hazard ratio [HR]; 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.14; P < .01) but not for SBRT (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.76-2.51; P = .3). The 2-year FFLP rate was 88.2% compared with 73.9%, favoring SBRT (P = .06). For tumors >= 2 cm in diameter, SBRT was associated with improved FFLP (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.93; P < .01). On multivariate analysis, treatment with SBRT (HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.07-0.62; P = .005) and smaller tumor size (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.47-0.91; P = .01) were associated with improved FFLP. The 2-year overall survival rate was 51.1%, with no difference between groups (P = .8). Grade >= 3 treatment-related toxicity was rare, with no difference between SBRT (n = 4) and RFA (n = 3). Conclusions: Treatment with SBRT or RFA is well tolerated and provides excellent and similar local control for intrahepatic metastases <2 cm in size. For tumors >= 2 cm in size, treatment with SBRT is associated with improved FFLP and may be the preferable treatment. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:950 / 958
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved Local Control with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared to Radiofrequency Ablation in the Treatment of Unresectable Intrahepatic Metastases
    Jackson, W. C.
    Tao, Y.
    Bazzi, L.
    Feng, M.
    Cuneo, K. C.
    Lawrence, T. S.
    Owen, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : S145 - S145
  • [2] Stereotactic body radiation therapy and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of liver metastases: How and when?
    Cacciola, Alberto
    Parisi, Silvana
    Tamburella, Consuelo
    Lillo, Sara
    Ferini, Gianluca
    Molino, Laura
    Iati, Giuseppe
    Pontoriero, Antonio
    Bottari, Antonio
    Mazziotti, Silvio
    Cicero, Giuseppe
    Minutoli, Fabio
    Blandino, Alfredo
    Pergolizzi, Stefano
    REPORTS OF PRACTICAL ONCOLOGY AND RADIOTHERAPY, 2020, 25 (03) : 299 - 306
  • [3] Radiofrequency Ablation versus Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
    Yu, Jesang
    Kim, Dong Hwan
    Lee, Jungbok
    Shin, Yong Moon
    Kim, Jong Hoon
    Yoon, Sang Min
    Jung, Jinhong
    Kim, Jin Cheon
    Yu, Chang Sik
    Lim, Seok-Byung
    Park, In Ja
    Kim, Tae Won
    Hong, Yong Sang
    Kim, Sun Young
    Kim, Jeong Eun
    Park, Jin-Hong
    Kim, So Yeon
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 54 (03): : 850 - 859
  • [4] Efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy over radiofrequency ablation for HCC
    Kim, N.
    Kim, H. J.
    Won, J. Y.
    Kim, D. Y.
    Han, K. H.
    Seong, J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S395 - S395
  • [5] Comparison of pulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of lung metastases
    Petrella, Francesco
    Spaggiari, Lorenzo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2019, 11 : S280 - S282
  • [6] Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the treatment of unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
    O'Connor, J.
    Goldstein, R.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (04)
  • [7] A Comparison Of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy For Metastases To The Sacral Spine And Treatment Of The Thoracolumbar Spine
    Kowalchuk, R. O.
    Waters, M. R.
    Richardson, K. M.
    Spencer, K. M.
    Larner, J. M.
    Sheehan, J. P.
    McAllister, W. H.
    Kersh, C. R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E692 - E692
  • [8] A comparison of stereotactic body radiation therapy for metastases to the sacral spine and treatment of the thoracolumbar spine
    Kowalchuk, Roman O.
    Waters, Michael R.
    Richardson, K. Martin
    Spencer, Kelly
    Larner, James M.
    Sheehan, Jason P.
    McAllister, William H.
    Kersh, Charles R.
    JOURNAL OF RADIOSURGERY AND SBRT, 2020, 7 (02): : 95 - 103
  • [9] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation for Inoperable Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Kim, Hayeon
    Gill, Beant
    Beriwal, Sushil
    Huq, M. Saiful
    Roberts, Mark S.
    Smith, Kenneth J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2016, 95 (04): : 1175 - 1183
  • [10] Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Curative Treatment of Adrenal Metastases
    Rudra, Sonali
    Malik, Renuka
    Ranck, Mark C.
    Farrey, Karl
    Golden, Daniel W.
    Hasselle, Michael D.
    Weichselbaum, Ralph R.
    Salama, Joseph K.
    TECHNOLOGY IN CANCER RESEARCH & TREATMENT, 2013, 12 (03) : 217 - 224