A comparison of physical and psychological features of responders and non-responders to cervical facet blocks in chronic whiplash

被引:33
|
作者
Smith, Ashley Dean [1 ,2 ]
Jull, Gwendolen [1 ]
Schneider, Geoff [2 ,3 ]
Frizzell, Bevan [2 ,3 ]
Hooper, Robert Allen [2 ,3 ]
Sterling, Michele [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Div Physiotherapy, NHMRC Ctr Clin Excellence Spinal Pain Injury & Hl, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[2] C Adv Spinal Care Ctr EFW Radiol, Calgary, AB T3B 4N2, Canada
[3] Univ Calgary, Fac Med, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Queensland, Ctr Natl Res Disabil & Rehabil Med, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
关键词
Whiplash; Facet joint injections; Sensory hypersensitivity; Central hyperexcitability; Post traumatic stress; Psychological distress; Neck pain; PERCUTANEOUS RADIOFREQUENCY NEUROTOMY; ZYGAPOPHYSIAL JOINT PAIN; SYMPATHETIC-NERVOUS-SYSTEM; LOCAL-ANESTHETIC BLOCKS; NECK DISABILITY INDEX; 2000-2010; TASK-FORCE; SENSORY HYPERSENSITIVITY; FLEXION REFLEX; DIAGNOSTIC UTILITY; HEALTHY-SUBJECTS;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2474-14-313
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Cervical facet block (FB) procedures are often used as a diagnostic precursor to radiofrequency neurotomies (RFN) in the management of chronic whiplash associated disorders (WAD). Some individuals will respond to the FB procedures and others will not respond. Such responders and non-responders provided a sample of convenience to question whether there were differences in their physical and psychological features. This information may inform future predictive studies and ultimately the clinical selection of patients for FB procedures. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 58 individuals with chronic WAD who responded to cervical FB procedures (WAD_R); 32 who did not respond (WAD_NR) and 30 Healthy Controls (HC)s. Measures included: quantitative sensory tests (pressure; thermal pain thresholds; brachial plexus provocation test); nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR); motor function (cervical range of movement (ROM); activity of the superficial neck flexors during the cranio-cervical flexion test (CCFT). Self-reported measures were gained from the following questionnaires: neuropathic pain (s-LANSS); psychological distress (General Health Questionnaire-28), post-traumatic stress (PDS) and pain catastrophization (PCS). Individuals with chronic whiplash attended the laboratory once the effects of the blocks had abated and symptoms had returned. Results: Following FB procedures, both WAD groups demonstrated generalized hypersensitivity to all sensory tests, decreased neck ROM and increased superficial muscle activity with the CCFT compared to controls (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between WAD groups (all p > 0.05). Both WAD groups demonstrated psychological distress (GHQ-28; p < 0.05), moderate post-traumatic stress symptoms and pain catastrophization. The WAD_NR group also demonstrated increased medication intake and elevated PCS scores compared to the WAD_R group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Chronic WAD responders and non-responders to FB procedures demonstrate a similar presentation of sensory disturbance, motor dysfunction and psychological distress. Higher levels of pain catastrophization and greater medication intake were the only factors found to differentiate these groups.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparison of physical and psychological features of responders and non-responders to cervical facet blocks in chronic whiplash
    Ashley Dean Smith
    Gwendolen Jull
    Geoff Schneider
    Bevan Frizzell
    Robert Allen Hooper
    Michele Sterling
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 14
  • [2] RESPONDERS AND NON-RESPONDERS TO TELEVISION EDITORIALS - COMPARISON
    ABEL, JD
    THORNTON, LR
    JOURNALISM QUARTERLY, 1975, 52 (03): : 477 - 484
  • [3] A Comparison of Responders and Non-responders Is Lacking Reply
    Senska, Gotz
    DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 113 (25): : 431 - 432
  • [4] THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF RANITIDINE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC DUODENAL ULCERATION - A COMPARISON OF RESPONDERS AND NON-RESPONDERS
    MCFADYEN, ML
    FOLB, PI
    MILLER, R
    MARKS, IN
    MOSHAL, MG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1983, 24 (04) : 441 - 447
  • [5] Cytokines in patients with chronic hepatitis C: Comparison between responders and non-responders to interferon
    Silva, M
    Fernandez, JL
    delPino, N
    Eiras, G
    Rendo, P
    Perez, V
    HEPATOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) : 719 - 719
  • [6] Participation bias in a sexuality survey: Psychological and behavioural characteristics of responders and non-responders
    Dunne, MP
    Martin, NG
    Bailey, JM
    Heath, AC
    Bucholz, KK
    Madden, PAF
    Statham, DJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 26 (04) : 844 - 854
  • [7] A COMPARISON OF RESPONDERS AND NON-RESPONDERS TO A PLACEBO AS AN ADJUNCTIVE TREATMENT IN SCHIZOPHRENIA PATIENTS
    Weiser, Mark
    Goldberg, S.
    Davidson, Michael
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2011, 37 : 326 - 326
  • [8] COMPARISON OF TREATMENT NON-RESPONDERS VERSUS RESPONDERS IN TRANSTHYRETIN AMYLOID CARDIOMYOPATHY
    Alshawkani, Yazan
    Yanek, Lisa
    Jefferson, Artrish
    Tsottles, Daniel
    Zampino, Serena
    Barranco, Jen
    Hubbard, Abby
    Ranek, Mark
    Sharma, Kavita
    Polydefkis, Michael
    Vaishnav, Joban
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 682 - 682
  • [9] Clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis C in patients treated with interferon: comparison between responders and non-responders
    Morisco, F
    Marmo, R
    Iasevoli, P
    Sessa, G
    Tuccillo, C
    Blanco, CD
    Caporaso, N
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1999, 31 (06): : 454 - 458
  • [10] Genomic profiles in patients with chronic migraine: responders vs. non-responders
    Hershey, AD
    Powers, SW
    Kabbouche, MA
    Burdine, D
    Glauser, TA
    Tang, Y
    Sharp, FR
    CEPHALALGIA, 2005, 25 (10) : 852 - 853