Patent protection, innovation, and technology transfer in a Schumpeterian economy

被引:14
|
作者
Zheng, Zhijie [1 ]
Huang, Chien-Yu [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Yang, Yibai [5 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Normal Univ Zhuhai, Ctr Innovat & Dev Studies, Zhuhai 519087, Peoples R China
[2] Acad Sinica, Inst Econ, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] North Carolina State Univ, Dept Econ, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] Int Univ Japan, Res Inst, Niigata, Japan
[5] Univ Macau, Dept Econ, Macau, Peoples R China
关键词
Innovation; Intellectual Property Rights Protection; North-South Product Cycles; R&D; Technology Transfer; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY-RIGHTS; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PRODUCT-CYCLE MODEL; NORTH-SOUTH TRADE; MULTINATIONAL FIRMS; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; GROWTH; IMITATION; DETERMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.euroecorev.2020.103531
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper analyzes the cross-country effects of intellectual property rights (IPR) protection on the relative wage, innovation, and technology transfer in a North-South quality-ladder model with innovative Northern R&D and adaptive Southern R&D. The degree of IPR protection in two countries differs in terms of patent breadth, which determines the markups of Northern firms and their Southern affiliates, respectively. In this model, stronger IPR protection in the South leads to a permanent decrease in the North-South wage gap, a temporary increase in the Northern innovation rate, and a permanent increase in technology transfer. By contrast, stronger IPR protection in the North leads to a permanent increase in the North-South wage gap, ambiguous effects on the Northern innovation rate, and a permanent decrease in technology transfer. Finally, we perform a quantitative analysis by calibrating the model to the US-China data, and the numerical results support these policy implications in addition to a welfare implication such that strengthening patent pro-tection in one country leads to sizable welfare improvements in both countries. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inflation and Innovation in a Schumpeterian Economy with North-South Technology Transfer
    Chu, Angus C.
    Cozzi, Guido
    Furukawa, Yuichi
    Liao, Chih-Hsing
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MONEY CREDIT AND BANKING, 2019, 51 (2-3) : 683 - 719
  • [2] Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy
    Angus C. Chu
    Yuichi Furukawa
    Sushanta Mallick
    Pietro Peretto
    Xilin Wang
    [J]. Economic Theory, 2021, 71 : 1429 - 1465
  • [3] Dynamic effects of patent policy on innovation and inequality in a Schumpeterian economy
    Chu, Angus C.
    Furukawa, Yuichi
    Mallick, Sushanta
    Peretto, Pietro
    Wang, Xilin
    [J]. ECONOMIC THEORY, 2021, 71 (04) : 1429 - 1465
  • [4] PATENT PROTECTION, INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY LICENSING
    Wang, Leonard F. S.
    Mukherjee, Arijit
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN ECONOMIC PAPERS, 2014, 53 (3-4) : 245 - 254
  • [5] Patent protection and global Schumpeterian growth
    Dinopoulos, Elias
    Gungoraydinoglu, Ali
    Syropoulos, Constantinos
    [J]. TRADE, GLOBALIZATION AND POVERTY, 2007, : 105 - 129
  • [6] Patent Licensing, Technology Transfer, and Innovation
    Lemley, Mark A.
    Feldman, Robin
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2016, 106 (05): : 188 - 192
  • [7] Private patent protection in the theory of Schumpeterian growth
    Davis, Lewis S.
    Sener, Fuat
    [J]. EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 56 (07) : 1446 - 1460
  • [8] PATENT PROTECTION AND TECHNOLOGY-TRANSFER IN TAIWAN
    TAKADA, M
    [J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 1984, 15 (04): : 501 - 516
  • [9] Patent protection, imitation and the mode of technology transfer
    Fosfuri, A
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION, 2000, 18 (07) : 1129 - 1149
  • [10] Schumpeterian growth and the political economy of employment protection
    Wolf-Heimo Grieben
    [J]. Journal of Economics, 2005, 86 (Suppl 1) : 77 - 118