Who Owns What? Psychological Ownership in Shared Augmented Reality

被引:14
|
作者
Poretski, Lev [1 ]
Arazy, Ofer [1 ]
Lanir, Joel [1 ]
Nov, Oded [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Dept Informat Syst, Haifa, Israel
[2] NYU, Tandon Sch Engn, Brooklyn, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102611
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Psychological ownership defines how we behave in and interact with the social world and the objects around us. Shared Augmented Reality (shared AR) may challenge conventional understanding of psychological ownership because virtual objects created by one user in a social place are available for other participants to see, interact with, and edit. Moreover, confusion may arise when one user attaches a virtual object in a shared AR environment onto the physical object that is owned by a different user. The goal of this study is to investigate tensions around psychological ownership in shared AR. Drawing on prior work, we developed a conceptualization of psychological ownership in shared AR in terms of five underlying dimensions: possession, control, identity, responsibility, and territoriality. We studied several shared AR scenarios through a laboratory experiment that was intended to highlight normative tensions. We divided participants into pairs, whereby one participant in each pair created the virtual object (object-creator) and placed it over the other person's (space proprietor) physical object or space. We recorded participants? perceptions of psychological ownership along the 5 dimensions through surveys and interviews. Our results reveal that the paired participants failed to form a mutual understanding of ownership over the virtual objects. In addition, the introduction of virtual objects called into question participants? sense of psychological ownership over the physical articles to which the virtual objects were attached. Building on our results, we offer a set of design principles for shared AR environments, intended specifically to alleviate psychological ownership-related concerns. Herein, we also discuss the implications of our findings for research and practice in this field.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] What's Mine Is a Hologram? How Shared Augmented Reality Augments Psychological Ownership
    Carrozzi, Amelia
    Chylinski, Mathew
    Heller, Jonas
    Hilken, Tim
    Keeling, Debbie I.
    de Ruyter, Ko
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERACTIVE MARKETING, 2019, 48 : 71 - 88
  • [2] Who Owns What, and Why? The Origins of Issue Ownership Beliefs
    Craig, Stephen C.
    Cossette, Paulina S.
    [J]. POLITICS & POLICY, 2020, 48 (01) : 107 - 134
  • [3] The influence of flow experience in the augmented reality context on psychological ownership
    Yuan, Chunlin
    Wang, Shuman
    Yu, Xiaolei
    Kim, Kyung Hoon
    Moon, Hakil
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING, 2021, 40 (06) : 922 - 944
  • [4] 'WHO OWNS WHAT'
    FRENAUD, A
    [J]. AMERICAN POETRY REVIEW, 1977, 6 (02): : 21 - 21
  • [5] Who owns the human genome? What can ownership mean with respect to genes?
    Markl, H
    [J]. IIC-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT LAW, 2002, 33 (01): : 1 - 5
  • [6] Hybrid Peace Ownership in Afghanistan: International Perspectives of Who Owns What and When
    Jarstad, Anna K.
    Olsson, Louise
    [J]. GLOBAL GOVERNANCE, 2012, 18 (01) : 105 - 119
  • [7] Virtual Objects in the Physical World: Relatedness and Psychological Ownership in Augmented Reality
    Poretski, Lev
    Arazy, Ofer
    Lanir, Joel
    Shahar, Shalev
    Nov, Oded
    [J]. CHI 2019: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2019 CHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS, 2019,
  • [8] How perceived value of augmented reality shopping drives psychological ownership
    Wang, Kai-Yu
    Ashraf, Abdul Rehman
    Thongpapanl, Narongsak
    Iqbal, Idaf
    [J]. INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024,
  • [9] Determining who owns what: Do children infer ownership from first possession?
    Friedman, Ori
    Neary, Karen R.
    [J]. COGNITION, 2008, 107 (03) : 829 - 849
  • [10] Who owns what, now?
    [J]. Edgar, M, 2005, New Zealand Institute of Forestry (50):