Efficacy of oxycodone in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with different infusion modes after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer a prospective, randomized, double-blind study

被引:2
|
作者
Zhu, Yejing [1 ]
Xie, Kangjie [1 ]
Yuan, Junbo [1 ]
Gu, Bin [1 ]
Lian, Yanhong [1 ]
Zhou, Huidan [1 ]
Fang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Canc Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer; oxycodone; patient-controlled analgesia; postoperative pain; VS; FENTANYL; PAIN; MORPHINE;
D O I
10.1097/MD.0000000000016810
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Backgroud: The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic and adverse effects of oxycodone with 3 different infusion modes on postoperative pain after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer. Methods: Ninety patients undergoing laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer were randomly divided into 3 groups: Group A (continuous infusion with 0.01mg/kg/h and a bolus dose with 0.03 mg/kg), Group B (a bolus dose with 0.03mg/kg) and Group C (PCA was administered as a time-scheduled decremental continuous infusion based on lean body mass). A blinded observer recorded Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Ramsay sedation score (RSS), infused cumulative dose of oxycodone and side effects at 1, 6, 12, 24, and 48hours postoperatively, and satisfaction during the postoperative 48hours. Results: There were significant differences in the VAS pain score when resting or coughing among 3 groups at 1, 6 and 48hours postoperatively (P < .05). VAS was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A and C until postoperative 1, 6, and 48hours (P <. 05). There were significant differences in cumulative PCA dose among the 3 groups at 1 and 48hours postoperatively (P <. 05). Group C showed significantly less amount of cumulative PCA dose compared to other 2 groups at 1 hour, whereas cumulative PCA dose of Group A at 48hours was significantly more than other 2 groups (P <. 05). There were no significant differences in postoperative nausea and vomiting, FAS, muscle chilling score and RSS among 3 groups at 1, 6, 12, 24 and 48hours postoperatively. In addition, there was no difference in overall satisfaction during 48hours postoperatively among 3 groups. Conclusions: Oxycodone provides significant analgesic effect in 3 different infusion modes over 48hours after laparoscopic radical surgery of cervical cancer, and a time-scheduled decremental continuous infusion of oxycodone can become a better choice for patients after surgery of cervical cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Oxycodone versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Kim, Nan Seol
    Lee, Jeong Seok
    Park, Su Yeon
    Ryu, Aeli
    Chun, Hea Rim
    Chung, Ho Soon
    Kang, Kyou Sik
    Chung, Jin Hun
    Jung, Kyung Taek
    Mun, Seong Taek
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (10)
  • [2] Efficacy and tolerability of oxycodone versus fentanyl for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after gastrointestinal laparotomy: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study
    Ding, Zhen
    Wang, Kaiguo
    Wang, Baosheng
    Zhou, Naibao
    Li, Hao
    Yan, Bo
    MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (39)
  • [3] The analgesic efficacy and safety of nefopam in patient-controlled analgesia after cardiac surgery: A randomized, double-blind, prospective study
    Kim, Kyungmi
    Kim, Wook-Jong
    Choi, Dae-Kee
    Lee, Yoon Kyung
    Choi, In-Cheol
    Sim, Ji-Yeon
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 42 (03) : 684 - 692
  • [4] The Analgesic Efficacy of Nefopam in Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Study
    Lee, Soomin
    Lee, Seounghun
    Kim, Hoseop
    Oh, Chahyun
    Park, Sooyong
    Kim, Yeojung
    Hong, Boohwi
    Yoon, Seokhwa
    Noh, Chan
    Ko, Youngkwon
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (05) : 1 - 9
  • [5] Effects of nefopam with fentanyl in intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after arthroscopic orthopedic surgery: a prospective double-blind randomized trial
    Oh, You Na
    Kim, Kyu Nam
    Jeong, Mi Ae
    Kim, Dong Won
    Kim, Ji Yoon
    Ki, Hyun Seo
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2018, 48 (01) : 142 - 149
  • [6] Oxycodone vs Sufentanil in Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia After Gynecological Tumor Operation: A Randomized Double-Blind Clinical Trial
    Dang, Sha-Jie
    Li, Rui-Li
    Wang, Jun
    Zeng, Wen-Bin
    He, Yun
    Yue, Hui-Yu
    Li, Si-Yuan
    Han, Li-Chun
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2020, 13 : 937 - 946
  • [7] INTRAARTICULAR MORPHINE ANALGESIA AFTER ARTHROSCOPIC KNEE SURGERY - A DOUBLE-BLIND, RANDOMIZED STUDY OF PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA
    HEGESCHEUING, G
    MICHAELSEN, K
    BUHLER, A
    KUSTERMANN, J
    SEELING, W
    ANAESTHESIST, 1995, 44 (05): : 351 - 358
  • [8] Comparison of the Analgesic Effect of Sufentanil versus Fentanyl in Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesia after Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Double-blind, Prospective Study
    Oh, Seok Kyeong
    Lee, Il Ok
    Lim, Byung Gun
    Jeong, Hyerim
    Kim, Young Sung
    Ji, Sul Gi
    Park, Jong Sun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2019, 16 (11): : 1439 - 1446
  • [9] Intraoperative and postoperative infusion of dexmedetomidine combined with butorphanol for intravenous patient-controlled analgesia after radical mastectomy: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial
    Chang, Jiangtao
    Wang, Xueyan
    Xin, Deqian
    Sun, Qiaoxia
    Jiang, Meiru
    Ma, Jiahai
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2017, 10 (02): : 2505 - 2513
  • [10] Is there any benefit to adding intravenous ketamine to patient-controlled epidural analgesia after thoracic surgery? A randomized double-blind study†
    Joseph, Catherine
    Gaillat, Francoise
    Duponq, Raphaele
    Lieven, Remi
    Baumstarck, Karine
    Thomas, Pascal
    Penot-Ragon, Christine
    Kerbaul, Francois
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2012, 42 (04) : E58 - E65