Organization of postural responses following a rotational support surface perturbation, after TKA: Sagittal plane rotations

被引:32
|
作者
Gage, William H.
Frank, James S.
Prentice, Stephen D.
Stevenson, Peter
机构
[1] Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON M5G 2A2, Canada
[2] Univ Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
total knee arthroplasty; osteoarthritis; balance control; postural perturbation;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.02.003
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Proprioceptive dysfunction, related to osteoarthritis and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be related to changes in gait, and may result in balance impairment. This study examined the organization of postural responses to rotational support surface perturbations after TKA. Eight TKA patients and nine control participants volunteered. EMG was collected bilaterally from lower limb muscles. Kinematic data were collected using an OPTOTRAK system. The temporal pattern of muscle activation was preserved in both the surgical and sound limbs of the patient groups, while muscle activation amplitude was reduced. Knee joint angular displacement was reduced in both limbs among patients. COM displacement was not different. Patients demonstrated a different method in recovering posture control following a postural perturbation. Bilateral changes appear to reflect a simplification in the organization of the motor response, in response to the needs of the injured, or previously injured limb. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 120
页数:9
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Postural responses following a rotational support surface perturbation, following knee joint replacement: Frontal plane rotations
    Gage, William H.
    Frank, James S.
    Prentice, Stephen D.
    Stevenson, Peter
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2008, 27 (02) : 286 - 293
  • [2] Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses
    Chiung-Ling Chen
    Shu-Zon Lou
    Hong-Wen Wu
    Shyi-Kuen Wu
    Kwok-Tak Yeung
    Fong-Chin Su
    Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11
  • [3] Effects of the type and direction of support surface perturbation on postural responses
    Chen, Chiung-Ling
    Lou, Shu-Zon
    Wu, Hong-Wen
    Wu, Shyi-Kuen
    Yeung, Kwok-Tak
    Su, Fong-Chin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROENGINEERING AND REHABILITATION, 2014, 11
  • [4] POSTURAL RESPONSES IN THE CAT TO UNEXPECTED ROTATIONS OF THE SUPPORTING SURFACE - EVIDENCE FOR A CENTRALLY GENERATED SYNERGIC ORGANIZATION
    MACPHERSON, JM
    RUSHMER, DS
    DUNBAR, DC
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1986, 62 (01) : 152 - 160
  • [5] Movement of the lumbar spine is critical for maintenance of postural recovery following support surface perturbation
    Mok, Nicola W.
    Hodges, Paul W.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2013, 231 (03) : 305 - 313
  • [6] Movement of the lumbar spine is critical for maintenance of postural recovery following support surface perturbation
    Nicola W. Mok
    Paul W. Hodges
    Experimental Brain Research, 2013, 231 : 305 - 313
  • [7] Stepping Responses in Young and Older Adults Following a Perturbation to the Support Surface During Gait
    McIntosh, Emily I.
    Zettel, John L.
    Vallis, Lori Ann
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2017, 49 (03) : 288 - 298
  • [8] The Pontomedullary Reticular Formation Contributes to the Compensatory Postural Responses Observed Following Removal of the Support Surface in the Standing Cat
    Stapley, Paul J.
    Drew, Trevor
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 101 (03) : 1334 - 1350
  • [9] Muscle spindle responses to horizontal support surface perturbation in the anesthetized cat: insights into the role of autogenic feedback in whole body postural control
    Honeycutt, Claire F.
    Nardelli, Paul
    Cope, Timothy C.
    Nichols, T. Richard
    JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 108 (05) : 1253 - 1261
  • [10] Continuous visual field motion impacts the postural responses of older and younger women during and after support surface tilt
    Slaboda, Jill C.
    Lauer, Richard T.
    Keshner, Emily A.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2011, 211 (01) : 87 - 96