Fact-checking in the televised debates of the Spanish general elections of 2015 and 2016

被引:21
|
作者
Mazaira-Castro, Andres [1 ]
Ruas-Araujo, Jose [2 ]
Puentes-Rivera, Ivan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vigo, Dept Org Empresas & Mkt, Vigo, Spain
[2] Univ Vigo, Dept Comunicac Audiovisual & Publicidad, Vigo, Spain
[3] Univ A Coruna, Dept Sociol & Ciencias Comunicac, La Coruna, Spain
来源
REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL | 2019年 / 74卷 / 06期
关键词
Fact-checking; televised debates; elections; disinformation; fake-news; COMMUNICATION; CAMPAIGN; TOOL; OLD;
D O I
10.4185/RLCS-2019-1355-38
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
Introduction: This article fact-checks the statements made in the televised debates that took place during the Spanish general elections of 2015, between Mariano Rajoy (PP) and Pedro Sanchez (PSOE), and 2016, between Soraya Saenz de Santamaria (PP), Pedro Sanchez (PSOE), Albert Rivera (Ciudadanos) and Pablo Iglesias (Podemos). Methods: A total of 335 and 382 factual assertions were extracted from two thematic blocks of the 2015 and 2016 debates, respectively, and subsequently fact-checked in order to determine their veracity. Results: More than 85% of the factual assertions made by participants were accurate. In fact, data accuracy was very high in the case of government representatives (95.4% in the case of Mariano Rajoy and 84.38% in the case of Soraya Saenz de Santamaria), followed by Pablo Iglesias (92%), Albert Rivera (88.89%) and Pedro Sanchez (58.1% and 69.23% in the 2015 and 2016 debates, respectively). Discussion and conclusions: Participants in televised debates use a significant amount of factual assertions that reveal their more technical or political profiles. However, they hardly cite their sources, which complicates fact-checking by the audience.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 766
页数:19
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Assessing the consistency of fact-checking in political debates
    Lelo, Thales
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 2023, 73 (06) : 587 - 600
  • [2] Elections and fact-checking in Portugal: the case of the 2019 and 2022 legislative elections
    Baptista, Joao-Pedro
    Jeronimo, Pedro
    Pineiro-Naval, Valeriano
    Gradim, Anabela
    PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2022, 31 (06):
  • [3] VERIFIC.AI APPLICATION: automated fact-checking in Brazilian 2018 general elections
    Rocha Junior, Dario Brito
    Da Cunha Carneiro Lins, Anthony Jose
    Ferreira De Souza, Alice Cristiny
    De Oliveira Liborio, Luiz Felipe
    De Brito Leitao, Andre Henrique
    Souza Santos, Flavio Henrique
    BRAZILIAN JOURNALISM RESEARCH, 2019, 15 (03) : 514 - 539
  • [4] Debating the Truth: The Impact of Fact-Checking During Electoral Debates
    Wintersieck, Amanda L.
    AMERICAN POLITICS RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (02) : 304 - 331
  • [5] Spanish Fact-Checking Services: An Approach to Their Business Models
    Esteban-Navarro, Miguel-Angel
    Nogales-Bocio, Antonia-Isabel
    Garcia-Madurga, Miguel-Angel
    Morte-Nadal, Tamara
    PUBLICATIONS, 2021, 9 (03)
  • [6] Fact-checking platforms in Spanish. Features, organisation and method
    Vizoso, Angel
    Vazquez-Herrero, Jorge
    COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY-SPAIN, 2019, 32 (01): : 127 - 142
  • [7] DISSEMINATION STRATEGY OF SPANISH FACT-CHECKING AGENCIES ON THEIR 'WHATSAPP' CHANNELS
    Garcia, Alejandra Tirado
    Alonso-Munoz, Laura
    INDEX COMUNICACION, 2024, 14 (02): : 33 - 56
  • [8] DISINFORMATION AND FACT-CHECKING IN THE 2019 URUGUAYAN ELECTIONS. THE CASE OF VERIFICADO URUGUAY
    Pedro Molina-Canabate, Juan
    Magallon-Rosa, Raul
    PERSPECTIVAS DE LA COMUNICACION, 2021, 14 (01): : 89 - 112
  • [9] Disinformation and fact-checking in the 2019 Argentine elections. The case of Reverso initiative
    Molina Canabate, Juan Pedro
    Magallon Rosa, Raul
    Paniagua Rojano, Francisco Javier
    JOURNAL OF LEARNING STYLES, 2020, 13 (26): : 33 - 49
  • [10] Social media audience of televised debates in the general elections of April 2019
    Fontenla-Pedreira, Julia
    Ruas-Araujo, Jose
    Conde-Vazquez, Erica
    REVISTA LATINA DE COMUNICACION SOCIAL, 2020, (76): : 1 - 16