共 13 条
Hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma stereotactic radiosurgery: what really matters? (Reprinted from J Neurosurg, vol 109, pg 129-136, 2008)
被引:38
|作者:
Linskey, Mark E.
[1
]
机构:
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Neurol Surg, Irvine, CA USA
关键词:
Gamma Knife radiosurgery;
hearing preservation;
stereotactic radiosurgery;
temporal bone;
vestibular schwannoma;
TEMPORAL BONE STRUCTURES;
INTRACRANIAL MENINGIOMAS;
RESECTED MENINGIOMAS;
ACOUSTIC NEURINOMAS;
IRRADIATION;
RADIOTHERAPY;
RECURRENCE;
NEUROPATHIES;
TOLERANCE;
NEUROMAS;
D O I:
10.3171/JNS/2008/109/12/S20
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for vestibular schwannomas has evolved and improved over time. Although early short-term follow-up reports suggest that fractionation yields hearing preservation rates equivalent to modern single-dose SRS techniques, significant questions remain regarding long-term tumor control after the use of fractionation in a late responding tumor with a low proliferative index and alpha/beta ratio. With single-dose SRS, critical hearing preservation variables include: 1) strict attention to prescription dose 3D conformality so that the ventral cochlear nucleus (VCN) receives s <= 9 Gy; 2) careful delineation of the 3D tumor margin to exclude the cochlear nerve when visualizable with contrast-enhanced T2-weighted MR volumetric imaging techniques and exclusion the dura mater of the anterior border of the internal auditory canal; 3) a tumor margin dose prescription <= 12 Gy; 4) optimization of the tumor treatment gradient index without sacrificing coverage and conformality; and 5) strict attention to prescription dose 3D conformality so that the modiolus and the basal turn of the cochlea receive the lowest possible dose (ideally < 4-5.33 Gy). Testable correlates for the relative importance of the VCN versus cochlear dose given the tonotopic organization of each structure suggests that VCN toxicity should lead to preferential loss of low hearing frequencies, while cochlear toxicity should lead to preferential loss of high hearing frequencies. The potential after SRS for hearing toxicity from altered endolymph and/or perilymph fluid dynamics either via impaired fluid production and/or absorption has yet to be explored. Serous otitis media, ossicular or temporal bone osteonecrosis, and chondromalacia are not likely to be relevant factors or considerations for hearing preservation after SRS.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 143
页数:8
相关论文