Factors Affecting Sensitivity of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Ototoxic Hearing Loss

被引:40
|
作者
Reavis, Kelly M. [1 ]
Phillips, David S. [1 ]
Fausti, Stephen A. [1 ,2 ]
Gordon, Jane S. [1 ]
Helt, Wendy J. [1 ]
Wilmington, Debra [1 ]
Bratt, Gene W. [3 ,4 ]
Konrad-Martin, Dawn [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Portland VA Med Ctr, VA RR&D Natl Ctr Rehabilitat Auditory Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dept Otolaryngol, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[3] VA Tennessee Valley Hlth Care Syst, Nashville, TN USA
[4] Vanderbilt Univ, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Nashville, TN 37212 USA
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2008年 / 29卷 / 06期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0b013e318181ad99
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives: (1) To determine the ototoxicity detection rate (sensitivity) for distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) testing in adults who received ototoxic medications and experienced pure-tone threshold changes during the course of treatment; (2) to determine the extent to which DPOAE sensitivity to ototoxicity depends on the type of drug administered (platinum or antibiotic), magnitude of ototoxic threshold shifts, pre-exposure pure-tone threshold, and DPOAE data; and (3) to build a model to predict DPOAE sensitivity. Design: DPOAE and audiometric data were obtained as part of a prospective Veterans Affairs study investigating methods of ototoxicity monitoring. Data were analyzed from 90 ears of 53 subjects receiving ototoxic medications and showing significant hearing changes in at least one ear. Pure-tone threshold data were obtained at frequencies from 0.5 to 20 kHz, using 1/6-octave precision near the upper frequency limit of hearing. DPOAE data are reported for f(2)'s from 0.8 to 8.0 kHz in 1/6-octave increments using primary levels (L-1/L-2) of 65/59 dB SPL and a primary frequency ratio (f(2)/f(1)) of 1.2. Test results were evaluated at various times during drug treatment to determine whether DPOAE level changes were associated with behavioral hearing changes. Univariate and multivariate analysis techniques were used to determine factors that affected DPOAE sensitivity to ototoxic damage. Results: Of the 90 ears examined, 82 (91%) had DPOAEs that could be monitored for changes. Sixty-four of these 82 ears (78%) had DPOAEs that were reduced or absent following drug treatment. DPOAE sensitivity to ototoxicity was unrelated to the type of ototoxic drug administered. Rather, DPOAE sensitivity depended on the magnitude of postexposure hearing changes and on variables related to pre-exposure audiogram and DPOAE measurements. Behavioral hearing changes not detected by DPOAEs were small on average (<7 dB). DPOAE sensitivity was reduced in cars with poorer pre-exposure hearing, and in ears with measurable DPOAE frequencies limited to f(2)'s below 2.5 kHz or more than one octave from the frequency region where hearing change occurred. Results of logistic regression modeling showed that DPOAEs present at f(2)'s greater than 2.5 kHz were associated with the eventual success of ototoxicity monitoring with DPOAEs. However, independent variables examined could not explain differences in the relative timing of behavioral and DPOAE changes. A roughly equivalent proportion of ears experienced DPOAE changes before, during, or after behavioral hearing changes. Conclusions: DPOAEs are a useful screening tool for ototoxicity in adults with pre-exposure hearing loss, but are less sensitive compared with a behavioral test method that targets thresholds near the upper limit of a subject's audible frequency range. Ears successfully monitored for ototoxicity with DPOAEs are those with better pre-exposure hearing, greater postexposure hearing changes, and baseline DPOAEs near the highest behavioral test frequencies and present at high f(2)'s. Results suggest that successful monitoring of ototoxicity with DPOAEs may be predicted clinically by assessing the measurable DPOAE f(2) frequency range and its relation to the highest behavioral test frequencies.
引用
收藏
页码:875 / 893
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS AND SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS
    MOULIN, A
    BERA, JC
    COLLET, L
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY, 1994, 33 (06): : 305 - 326
  • [2] Occupational hearing loss: screening with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions
    Chan, VSW
    Wong, ECM
    McPherson, B
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (06) : 323 - 329
  • [3] Transient and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the diagnosis of profound hearing loss
    Scholer, C
    Schonweiler, R
    Ptok, M
    [J]. HNO, 1997, 45 (12) : 1008 - 1015
  • [4] DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN NORMALLY HEARING SUBJECTS
    PEREZ, N
    DEERENCHUN, IR
    OLLETA, MI
    GARCIATAPIA, R
    [J]. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE FISIOLOGIA, 1993, 49 (03): : 169 - 174
  • [5] DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS
    SEIDMAN, MD
    [J]. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 1995, 112 (04) : 628 - 628
  • [6] Sensitive developmental periods for kanamycin ototoxic effects on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions
    Henley, CM
    Weatherly, RA
    Martin, GK
    LonsburyMartin, B
    [J]. HEARING RESEARCH, 1996, 98 (1-2) : 93 - 103
  • [7] REPEATABILITY OF DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN NORMALLY HEARING HUMANS
    ROEDE, J
    HARRIS, FP
    PROBST, R
    XU, L
    [J]. AUDIOLOGY, 1993, 32 (05): : 273 - 281
  • [8] DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN THE ELDERLY
    KARZON, RK
    GARCIA, P
    PETEREIN, JL
    GATES, GA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OTOLOGY, 1994, 15 (05): : 596 - 605
  • [9] DISTORTION-PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS IN DOGS
    ROGERS, RK
    THELIN, JW
    SIMS, MH
    MUENCHEN, RA
    [J]. PROGRESS IN VETERINARY NEUROLOGY, 1995, 6 (02): : 45 - 49
  • [10] The effects of aging on distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in adults with normal hearing
    Uchida, Yasue
    Ando, Fujiko
    Shimokata, Hiroshi
    Sugiura, Saiko
    Ueda, Hiromi
    Nakashima, Tsutomu
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 2008, 29 (02): : 176 - 184