Effect of different substrates on yield and quality of tomato

被引:0
|
作者
Çelikel, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Alata Hort Res Inst, Erdemli, Icel, Turkey
关键词
tomato; substrates; plastichouse; glasshouse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Two experiments were conducted in a plastic and a glass greenhouses to test different substrates in tomato growing. Peat + volcanic tuff + spent mushroom compost (1:1:1), volcanic tuff + spent mushroom compost (1:1), peat + volcanic tuff (1:1), and volcanic tuff were used in both trials. In addition to those, spent mushroom compost and peat in the plastichouse, and rockwool in the glasshouse were also tested. In both trials, plants grown in soil were evaluated as control. Peat + volcanic tuff + spent mushroom compost (1:1:1) gave the highest early and total yields in both greenhouses. Early and total yields were higher in all substrates compared to the yield obtained from soil grown plants. Fruit weight also increased in plants grown in substrates compared to soil and the heaviest fruits were harvested from the plants grown in peat + volcanic tuff + spent mushroom compost (1:1:1). In terms of fruit quality (TSS, TA, pH and vitamin C) there were no significant differences between the substrates and soil.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 356
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effect of Different Substrates on Fruit Yield and Quality of Cherry Tomato Grown in a Closed Soilless System
    Al-Ajmi, A.
    Al-Karaki, G.
    Othman, Y.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRATEGIES TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY OF PROTECTED CULTIVATION IN MILD WINTER CLIMATE, 2009, 807 : 491 - 494
  • [2] Effect of different irrigation schedules, substrates and substrate volumes on fruit quality and yield of greenhouse tomato
    Tüzel, IH
    Tüzel, Y
    Gül, A
    Altunlu, H
    Eltez, RZ
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON GROWING MEDIA AND HYDROPONICS, 2001, (548): : 285 - 291
  • [3] Effect of different nutritional management on yield and quality of tomato fruits
    Terry-Alfonso, Elein
    Ruiz-Padron, Josefa
    Carrillo-Sosa, Yudines
    [J]. AGRONOMIA MESOAMERICANA, 2018, 29 (02): : 389 - 401
  • [4] Effect of Different Rootstock Type on Quality and Yield of Tomato Fruits
    Miskovic, A.
    Ilin, Z.
    Markovic, V.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON STRATEGIES TOWARDS SUSTAINABILITY OF PROTECTED CULTIVATION IN MILD WINTER CLIMATE, 2009, 807 : 619 - 624
  • [5] Effect of different greenhouse covering photoselective films on yield and quality of tomato
    Lopez-Marin, J.
    Gonzalez, A.
    Egea-Gilabert, C.
    Fernandez, J. A.
    [J]. VII CONGRESO IBERICO DE AGROINGENIERIA Y CIENCIAS HORTICOLAS: INNOVAR Y PRODUCIR PARA EL FUTURO. INNOVATING AND PRODUCING FOR THE FUTURE, 2014, : 1563 - 1568
  • [6] Effect of potassium on yield and quality of tomato
    Peyvast, G
    [J]. ASIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY, 2006, 18 (02) : 1231 - 1235
  • [7] Yield and quality of tomato produced on substrates and with application of humic acids
    de Lima, Antonio A.
    Alvarenga, Marco Antonio R.
    Rodrigues, Leandro
    Chitarra, Admilson B.
    [J]. HORTICULTURA BRASILEIRA, 2011, 29 (03) : 269 - 274
  • [8] Effects of brown seaweed extract, silicon, and selenium on fruit quality and yield of tomato under different substrates
    Jalali, Peyman
    Roosta, Hamid Reza
    Khodadadi, Mohsen
    Torkashvand, Ali Mohammadi
    Jahromi, Marzieh Ghanbari
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (12):
  • [9] EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SUBSTRATES ON THE GROWTH AND YIELD OF TOMATO (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill) UNDER GREENHOUSE CONDITIONS
    Daniel Ortega-Martinez, Luis
    Sanchez-Olarte, Josset
    Ocampo-Mendoza, Juventino
    Sandoval-Castro, Engelberto
    Alicia Salcido-Ramos, Blanca
    Manzo-Ramos, Fernando
    [J]. REVISTA RA XIMHAI, 2010, 6 (03): : 339 - 346
  • [10] The effect of different salts applied at different development stages on the yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)
    Yurtseven, E
    Halloran, DN
    Kütük, C
    Demir, K
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TECHNIQUES TO CONTROL SALINATION FOR HORTICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY, 2002, (573): : 415 - 421