Operational Performance of Sustainable Measures in Public Buildings

被引:9
|
作者
Abdallah, Moatassem [1 ]
El-Rayes, Khaled [2 ]
Liu, Liang [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
关键词
Green building measures; Operational performance; Public buildings; User satisfaction; Ease of maintenance; Operational problems; Payback period; Cost and schedule;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000770
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Buildings in the United States account for 40% of the national annual energy consumption, 39% of carbon footprint, and 13% of water consumption. To minimize these negative environmental impacts and improve life-cycle cost performance, an increasing number of public and private owners are requiring that their existing and new buildings incorporate more sustainable building measures. Despite the recent increase in the use of these sustainable building measures, there is a pressing need to explore their actual operational performance. This paper presents the findings of a recent study that evaluated the performance of sustainable measures in public buildings, such as rest areas, including energy efficient fluorescent and LED lights, solar photovoltaic systems and water heaters, daylight tubes, geothermal heat pumps, wind power technology, motion-activated lighting, double-pane glass, energy-efficient hand dryers, water-conserving fixtures, rain gardens, and graywater systems. The study conducted a comprehensive survey of state departments of transportation (DOTs) to gather and analyze personnel's experiences in implementing various green measures in their buildings. A total of 30 state DOTs in the United States participated in the survey in addition to one response from the Ontario Ministry of Transportation in Canada. The primary contributions this research makes to the body of knowledge are the new knowledge it provides on the actual operational performance of various green building measures in state DOT buildings including the frequency of their use, user satisfaction, ease of maintenance, encountered problems, repair costs, reductions in electricity/water usage, and payback periods. While there are different ways of evaluating the performance of the green measures, this study concentrates on the feedback and experiences of the personnel who have actually implemented these green measures in their facilities. These important findings based on user experiences on the performance of building measures are useful to both researchers and professionals in the construction industry and will contribute to better selection and use of these measures toward improving building sustainability. (C) 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sustainable performance in public buildings supported by daylighting technology
    Garcia-Fernandez, Berta
    Omar, Osama
    [J]. SOLAR ENERGY, 2023, 264
  • [2] Towards sustainability by aligning operational programmes and sustainable performance measures
    Gusmao Caiado, Rodrigo Goyannes
    Goncalves Quelhas, Osvaldo Luiz
    de Mattos Nascimento, Daniel Luiz
    Anholon, Rosley
    Leal Filho, Walter
    [J]. PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2019, 30 (5-6) : 413 - 425
  • [3] Economic and GHG Emission Analysis of Implementing Sustainable Measures in Existing Public Buildings
    Abdallah, Moatassem
    El-Rayes, Khaled
    Liu, Liang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2016, 30 (06)
  • [4] Tall buildings: Measures of green and sustainable!
    Burnett, J
    [J]. Tall Buildings: From Engineering to Sustainability, 2005, : 972 - 978
  • [5] Operational performance measures for startups
    Rompho, Nopadol
    [J]. MEASURING BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2018, 22 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [6] Sustainable Masjid Architecture and Public Buildings
    Tohid, Zainon
    Abd Rahim, Asiah
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT-BEHAVIOUR PROCEEDINGS JOURNAL, 2016, 1 (01): : 88 - 93
  • [7] Waste Management and Operational Energy for Sustainable Buildings: A Review
    Amaral, Rosaria E. C.
    Brito, Joel
    Buckman, Matt
    Drake, Elicia
    Ilatova, Esther
    Rice, Paige
    Sabbagh, Carlos
    Voronkin, Sergei
    Abraham, Yewande S.
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (13)
  • [8] The need for economic performance measures for life cycle costing of sustainable commercial office buildings
    Oduyemi, Olufolahan
    Okoroh, Michael Iheoma
    Fajana, Oluwaseun Samuel
    Arowosafe, Oluwumi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FACILITIES MANAGEMENT, 2018, 16 (01) : 54 - 64
  • [9] On the Contributions of Operational Flexibility Offered by Smart Sustainable Residential Buildings
    Avramidis, Iason I.
    Capitanescu, Florin
    Deconinck, Geert
    [J]. 2020 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE (ISGT-EUROPE 2020): SMART GRIDS: KEY ENABLERS OF A GREEN POWER SYSTEM, 2020, : 834 - 838
  • [10] SUSTAINABLE PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN WELS (UPPER AUSTRIA)
    Mertenova, Katerina
    Ploederl, Heinz
    [J]. CESB 10: CENTRAL EUROPE TOWARDS SUSTAINABLE BUILDING - FROM THEORY TO PRACTICE, 2010, : 311 - 314