Rates of Readmission and Emergency Department Visits of Publicly Versus Commercially Insured Patients in a Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Accredited Center

被引:0
|
作者
Clapp, Benjamin [1 ,3 ]
Vivar, Andres [2 ]
Castro, Christian [1 ]
Kim, Jisoo [1 ]
Gamez, Jesus [1 ]
Dodoo, Christopher [1 ]
Davis, Brian [1 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech HSC, Dept Surg, Paul Foster Sch Med, El Paso, TX USA
[2] Univ Autonoma Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
[3] 1700 N Mesa, El Paso, TX 79902 USA
关键词
Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery; Readmissions; Emergency Room visits; Medicare; Medicaid; LAPAROSCOPIC GASTRIC BYPASS; HOSPITAL READMISSION; MEDICAID STATUS; OUTCOMES; LENGTH; STAY;
D O I
10.4293/JSLS.2022.00009
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Patients with governmental insurance are known to utilize the emergency department (ER) at a higher rate and have higher readmission rates than other patients. Twenty percent of our patients are publicly insured. Our objective was to determine if there was a higher rate of readmissions and ER visits within 30 days in publicly insured patients.Methods: Data was analyzed from a single center submit-ted to the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Participant Use Data File from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2018. We added insurance status and described quantitative varia-bles using mean, and standard deviation (SD). These were reported as regression coefficients (RC) and prevalence ra-tio (PR), along with their 95% confidence interval (CI). P values of less than 5% were considered statistically signifi-cant.Results: The overall rate of ER visits, readmissions, and reoperations were 3.5%, 7.4%, and 2.2% respectively. Medicaid and Medicare patients were found to have longer operative times, 62.7 minutes vs 57.5 minutes(p = 0.35). Patients on public insurance had higher adjusted risk of ER visits (PR 1.43, 95% CI: 0.41-5.3 ; p = 0.58) and readmissions (PR 1.64, 95% CI: 0.76-3.55; p = 0.21) than patients on commercial/self-pay insur-ance. Re-operations were lower in the publicly insured group (PR 0.93, 95% CI: 0.2-4.7; p = 0.92) than patients on commercial/self-pay insurance. However, these outcomes were not statistically significant.Conclusions: Publicly insured patients tend to have a higher adjusted risk of ER visits and readmissions but was not statistically significant. The rate of re-operation was slightly lower in publicly insured patients.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Implementation of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and outcomes of bariatric surgery
    Al-Mazrou, Ahmed M.
    Bellorin, Omar
    Dakin, Gregory
    Pomp, Alfons
    Unruh, Mark Aaron
    Afaneh, Cheguevara
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 225 (02): : 362 - 366
  • [2] Bariatric Surgery in the Elderly: An Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database
    Haskins, Ivy N.
    Kuang, Xiangyu
    Amdur, Richard
    Lin, Paul P.
    Vaziri, Khashayar
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2017, 225 (04) : E55 - E55
  • [3] Outcomes after metabolic and bariatric surgery in preteens versus teens using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database and center-specific data
    Shah, Adil
    Liang, Norah E.
    Bruzoni, Mattias
    Pratt, Janey S. A.
    Zitsman, Jeffrey
    Nadler, Evan P.
    OBESITY, 2024, 32 (01) : 150 - 155
  • [4] Limitations of the 2015-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database for emergency bariatric operations
    Corpodean, Florina
    Ross, Robert C.
    Danos, Denise
    Cook, Michael
    Schauer, Philip R.
    Albaugh, Vance L.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (09)
  • [5] Comment on: Limitations of the 2015-2021 Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database for emergency bariatric operations
    Rosen, Claire B.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2024, 20 (09) : 829 - 830
  • [6] Does accreditation matter? An analysis of complications of bariatric cases using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program and National Quality Improvement Program databases
    Clapp, Benjamin
    Grasso, Samuel
    Gamez, Jesus
    Edwards, Jensen
    Dodoo, Cristopher
    Portela, Ray
    Ghanem, Omar M.
    Davis, Brian R.
    SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES, 2022, 18 (05) : 658 - 665
  • [7] Outcomes From a Level 1 Trauma and Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Center of Excellence
    Anderson, Tiffany N.
    Williams, Eric M.
    Loftus, Tyler J.
    Johnson-Mann, Crystal N.
    Taylor, Jessica E.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2023, 89 (06) : 2920 - 2922
  • [8] CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE AFTER LAPAROSCOPIC BARIATRIC SURGERY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY ACCREDITATION AND QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
    Dang, ThucNhi T.
    Dang, Jerry
    Moolla, Muhammad
    Switzer, Noah
    Madsen, Karen
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (06) : S1477 - S1478
  • [9] Clostridium difficile and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database
    ThucNhi T. Dang
    Jerry T. Dang
    Muhammad Moolla
    Noah Switzer
    Karen Madsen
    Daniel W. Birch
    Shahzeer Karmali
    Obesity Surgery, 2019, 29 : 1881 - 1888
  • [10] Clostridium difficile and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery: an Analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program Database
    Dang, ThucNhi T.
    Dang, Jerry T.
    Moolla, Muhammad
    Switzer, Noah
    Madsen, Karen
    Birch, Daniel W.
    Karmali, Shahzeer
    OBESITY SURGERY, 2019, 29 (06) : 1881 - 1888