Can Science Bridge the Is-Ought gap? A Response to Michael Shermer

被引：1

|

作者：

Ellis, George ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Cape Town, Dept Math & Appl Math Grav, Complex Syst, Rondebosch, South Africa

[2] Int Soc Gen Relat & Gravitat, Rondebosch, South Africa

来源：

THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE | 2018年 / 16卷 / 01期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1080/14746700.2018.1413801

中图分类号：

N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];

学科分类号：

01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页码：1 / 5

页数：5

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Minding the Is-Ought Gap
Campbell Brown
Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2014, 43 : 53 - 69
[2] MIND THE IS-OUGHT GAP
Singer, Daniel J.
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2015, 112 (04): : 193 - 210
[3] Truthmaking and the is-ought gap
Fine, Kit
SYNTHESE, 2021, 198 (02) : 887 - 914
[4] Minding the Is-Ought Gap
Brown, Campbell
JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC, 2014, 43 (01) : 53 - 69
[5] IS-OUGHT GAP - DEDUCTION OR JUSTIFICATION
WITKOWSKI, K
PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 1975, 36 (02) : 233 - 245
[6] The is-ought gap and the substitution criterion
Chen, Melvin
SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2021, 40 (03) : 254 - 264
[7] What Kind of Is-Ought Gap is There and What Kind Ought There Be?
Magnus, P. D.
Mandle, Jon
JOURNAL OF MORAL PHILOSOPHY, 2017, 14 (04) : 373 - 393
[8] IS-OUGHT - A RISKY RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEOLOGY AND SCIENCE
HEFNER, P
ZYGON, 1980, 15 (04): : 377 - 395
[9] SOME VALID (BUT NO SOUND) ARGUMENTS TRIVIALLY SPAN THE IS-OUGHT GAP
KARMO, T
MIND, 1988, 97 (386) : 253 - 257
[10] THE IS-OUGHT PROBLEM, THE OPEN QUESTION ARGUMENT, AND THE NEW SCIENCE OF MORALITY
Belohrad, Radim
HUMAN AFFAIRS-POSTDISCIPLINARY HUMANITIES & SOCIAL SCIENCES QUARTERLY, 2011, 21 (03): : 262 - 271

← 1 2 3 4 5 →