Evaluation of five feature selection methods for remote sensing data

被引:2
|
作者
Murni, A [1 ]
Mulyono [1 ]
Chahyati, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Fac Comp Sci, Jakarta 10002, Indonesia
来源
关键词
co-occurrence matrix features; semivariogram features; feature extraction and selection; joint pair approach; principal component transform; synthetic aperture radar; Landsat TM; ERTS-1; augmented-vector approach; multisensor fusion;
D O I
10.1117/12.441584
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This paper evaluates five potential feature selection methods in the application of remote sensing. The five methods include the sequential forward floating selection, the joint pair approach, band selection based on variance, the principal component transform, and the visual-based selection. Optical-sensor image and synthetic aperture radar image are used for experiments. Several recommendations are made based on this study. For optical-sensor images, the five feature selection methods: sequential forward floating selection, joint pair, band selection, principal component transform, and visual-based selection could have about the same classification accuracy using two to five selected features. The case study has shown that the sequential forward floating selection is the best feature selection method for both optical and synthetic aperture radar feature image selection, followed by the joint pair (for two-feature selection), visual-based selection, band selection, and principal component transform. For band L and band X synthetic aperture radar feature images, entropy, homogeneity, inverse difference moment, and maximum probability, East to West and West to East semivariogram, the local mean value, maximum, and minimum are the best features of the co-occurrence matrix model, semivariogram model, and local statistic model. For Landsat TM images band 7, 4, 5, 3, 1, and 2 are significant feature images. Applying the sequential forward floating selection to select two to five features from the potential features can obtain classification accuracy greater than 90%.
引用
收藏
页码:196 / 202
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Spectral characteristics and feature selection of hyperspectral remote sensing data
    Jiang, XG
    Tang, LL
    Wang, CY
    Wang, C
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2004, 25 (01) : 51 - 59
  • [2] FODSPO BASED FEATURE SELECTION FOR HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Ghamisi, Pedram
    Couceiro, Micael S.
    Benediktsson, Jon Atli
    [J]. 2014 6TH WORKSHOP ON HYPERSPECTRAL IMAGE AND SIGNAL PROCESSING: EVOLUTION IN REMOTE SENSING (WHISPERS), 2014,
  • [3] An evaluation of feature selection methods for environmental data
    Effrosynidis, Dimitrios
    Arampatzis, Avi
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2021, 61
  • [4] Logistic regression for feature selection and soft classification of remote sensing data
    Cheng, Qi
    Varshney, Pramod K.
    Arora, Manoj K.
    [J]. IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2006, 3 (04) : 491 - 494
  • [5] Feature selection method of remote sensing data based on physicomimetics algorithm
    Wei, Fangjie
    Wang, Liguo
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING, VOLS 1-3, 2014, 46 : 279 - 286
  • [6] Selection Strategy of Classification Methods for Hyperspectral Remote Sensing Data
    Shang, Kun
    Xiao, Chenchao
    Wei, Hongyan
    Xie, Yisong
    [J]. 2016 4rth International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications (EORSA), 2016,
  • [7] Feature selection from high resolution remote sensing data for biotope mapping
    Bindel, Marcus
    Hese, Soeren
    Berger, Christian
    Schmullius, Christiane
    [J]. ISPRS HANNOVER WORKSHOP 2011: HIGH-RESOLUTION EARTH IMAGING FOR GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION, 2011, 39-4 (W19): : 39 - 44
  • [8] EVALUATION OF SIMILARITY MEASURE METHODS FOR HYPERSPECTRAL REMOTE SENSING DATA
    Zhang, Junzhe
    Zhu, Wenquan
    Wang, Lingli
    Jiang, Nan
    [J]. 2012 IEEE INTERNATIONAL GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING SYMPOSIUM (IGARSS), 2012, : 4138 - 4141
  • [9] Comparison of some feature subset selection methods for use in remote sensing image analysis
    Smits, PC
    [J]. IGARSS 2001: SCANNING THE PRESENT AND RESOLVING THE FUTURE, VOLS 1-7, PROCEEDINGS, 2001, : 530 - 533
  • [10] Comparison of data mining algorithms in remote sensing using Lidar data fusion and feature selection
    Rozario, Papia
    Gomes, Rahul
    [J]. 2021 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRO INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (EIT), 2021, : 236 - 243