A survey of denoising techniques for multi-parametric prostate MRI

被引:15
|
作者
Garg, Gaurav [1 ]
Juneja, Mamta [1 ]
机构
[1] Panjab Univ, Univ Inst Engn & Technol, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Chandigarh, India
关键词
Filters; Denoising; Multi-parametric; MRI; Noise; Prostate; SEGMENTATION TECHNIQUES; IMAGE; NOISE;
D O I
10.1007/s11042-018-6487-2
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Denoising is one of active area of research in the image-processing domain since last decade. Internal and external conditions of acquisition device are the main source of noise in an image during the procurement process, which is often impossible to avoid in practical situations. Since many different image denoising algorithms have been recommended till date, but the issue of noise elimination remains an undefended challenge. The main objective of this paper is to study and analyze the behavior of different denoising filters for multi-parametric (mp) prostate MRI so that the appropriate filter can be selected unanimously. This study evaluates the performance of fifteen denoising filters (Anisotropic, Median, Wiener, Gaussian, Mean, Wavelet, Contourlet, Bilateral, Curvelet, WHMT, NLM, GFOE, LMMSE, CURE-LET and ARF) w.r.t mp-prostate MRI i.e. T2w, DCE and DWI images in the presence of Gaussian and Rician noise. Evaluation is done in both variable and fixed level of noise. Both subjective and objective quality assessment parameters are considered for determining the final rating of filters executed over 300 mp-MRI images. This study concludes that anisotropic and NLM filter should be opted for denoising task because of their structural and other crucial details preserving capability.
引用
收藏
页码:12689 / 12722
页数:34
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A survey of denoising techniques for multi-parametric prostate MRI
    Gaurav Garg
    Mamta Juneja
    Multimedia Tools and Applications, 2019, 78 : 12689 - 12722
  • [2] Denoising techniques for multi-parametric prostate MRI: A Comparative Study
    Latrach, Afef
    Trigui, Rania
    Sellemi, Lamia
    2020 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES FOR SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING (ATSIP'2020), 2020,
  • [3] Implementation of Multi-parametric Prostate MRI in Clinical Practice
    Andrea S. Kierans
    Samir S. Taneja
    Andrew B. Rosenkrantz
    Current Urology Reports, 2015, 16
  • [4] Implementation of Multi-parametric Prostate MRI in Clinical Practice
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Taneja, Samir S.
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2015, 16 (08)
  • [5] Role of multi-parametric (mp) MRI in prostate cancer
    Nazim, Syed Muhammad
    Ather, Muhammad Hammad
    Salam, Basit
    JOURNAL OF THE PAKISTAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 68 (01) : 98 - 104
  • [6] Multi-parametric MRI Examinations for the Detection of Prostate Cancer
    Graewert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2019, 191 (03): : 185 - 185
  • [7] The use of multi-parametric MRI in the detection of prostate cancer
    Bolton, E. M.
    Quinlan, M.
    Costelloe, J.
    O'Kelly, F.
    Galvin, D.
    Lennon, G.
    Mulvin, D.
    McMahon, C.
    Quinlan, D.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 114 : 21 - 22
  • [8] NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE OF A NEGATIVE MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI OF PROSTATE
    Mahon, Joseph
    Kaufman, Ronald P., Jr.
    O'Malley, Rebecca
    Mian, Badar
    Fisher, Hugh
    Essa, Ahmed
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 195 (04): : E697 - E697
  • [9] A Decomposable Model for the Detection of Prostate Cancer in Multi-parametric MRI
    Lay, Nathan
    Tsehay, Yohannes
    Sumathipala, Yohan
    Cheng, Ruida
    Gaur, Sonia
    Smith, Clayton
    Barbu, Adrian
    Lu, Le
    Turkbey, Baris
    Choyke, Peter L.
    Pinto, Peter
    Summers, Ronald M.
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2018, PT II, 2018, 11071 : 930 - 939
  • [10] IMPACT OF MULTIFOCALITY ON PROSTATE CANCER DETECTION BY MULTI-PARAMETRIC MRI
    Tan, Nelly
    Le, Jesse
    Margolis, Daniel
    Lu, David
    King, Kevin
    Raman, Steven
    Reiter, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 191 (04): : E588 - E589