Multi-period emissions trading in the electricity sector - winners and losers

被引:49
|
作者
Bode, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamburg Inst Int Econ, D-20347 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
allocation of GHG allowances; electricity sector; multi-period emission trading;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2004.06.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In the context of controlling greenhouse gas emissions, the directive on a Europe-wide trading scheme may be perceived as one of the most important milestones in recent years. Prior to its start, however, a number of very specific design features have to be agreed upon. Regarding the allocation of allowances, a distribution (almost) free of charge seems to be the most likely choice. An aspect that has interestingly attracted little attention in the past is the question of how to allocate emission rights over time. The following paper analyses different allocation options in multi-period emissions trading that are currently discussed in the European context. The options are applied for the electricity sector which is simulated over two periods. The paper distinguishes between a market effect of emissions trading and compliance costs for meeting the emission reduction obligation. The market effect results from a price increase which is due to the fact that opportunity costs for using allowances must be considered. It turns out that the electricity sector as a whole gains from the introduction of the instrument due to the increase of the electricity price. With regard to the different allocation options, it is found that utilities have different preferences depending on the fuel used. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:680 / 691
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impacts of Emissions Trading on a Company Under Uncertain Multi-Period Environment
    Zapletal, F.
    [J]. FUZZY INFORMATION AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 11 (03) : 241 - 256
  • [2] Winners and Losers of EU Emissions Trading: Insights from the EUTL Transfer Dataset
    Cludius, Johanna
    [J]. ECONOMICS OF ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY, 2018, 7 (02) : 93 - 110
  • [3] A multi-period optimisation model for planning carbon sequestration retrofits in the electricity sector
    Lee, Jui-Yuan
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 198 : 12 - 20
  • [4] DUAL TRADING - WINNERS, LOSERS, AND MARKET IMPACT
    SARKAR, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL INTERMEDIATION, 1995, 4 (01) : 77 - 93
  • [5] Process integration methods for multi-period carbon trading
    Migo-Sumagang, Maria Victoria
    Aviso, Kathleen B.
    Bandyopadhyay, Santanu
    Foo, Dominic C. Y.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 447
  • [6] Winners and losers from the gradual formation of trading blocs
    Macho-Stadler, Ines
    Xue, Licun
    [J]. ECONOMICA, 2007, 74 (296) : 664 - 681
  • [7] Trading volume for winners and losers on the Tokyo Stock Exchange
    Bremer, M
    Kato, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS, 1996, 31 (01) : 127 - 142
  • [8] Choosing winners and losers in a classroom permit trading game
    Anderson, LR
    Stafford, SL
    [J]. SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2000, 67 (01) : 212 - 219
  • [9] Optimal bidding in a multi-period electricity spot market
    Beck, E. V.
    Cherkaoui, R.
    Germond, A.
    [J]. 2008 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRIC UTILITY DEREGULATION AND RESTRUCTURING AND POWER TECHNOLOGIES, VOLS 1-6, 2008, : 107 - 115
  • [10] Sustainable multi-period electricity planning for Iskandar Malaysia
    Zarina Ab Muis
    Wai Shin Ho
    Haslenda Hashim
    Ming Yang Lee
    Ahmad Fakrul Ramli
    [J]. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 2016, 18 : 2467 - 2478