Delay to angiography and outcomes following presentation with high-risk, non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: results from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events

被引:41
|
作者
Swanson, N. [1 ]
Montalescot, G. [2 ]
Eagle, K. A. [3 ]
Goodman, S. G. [4 ]
Huang, W. [5 ]
Brieger, D. [6 ]
Devlin, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Waikato Hosp, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Hosp Pitie Salpetriere, Paris, France
[3] Univ Michigan Hlth Syst, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[4] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Terrence Donnelly Heart Ctr, Div Cardiol, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
[5] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, Worcester, MA USA
[6] Concord Hosp, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
UNSTABLE ANGINA; MYOCARDIAL-INFARCTION; INTERVENTION;
D O I
10.1136/hrt.2008.149922
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: To test if delay-to-angiography (>72 hours from admission) in patients presenting with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) is associated with adverse outcomes. Design: GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) is a multinational registry of patients admitted with NSTE-ACS. Setting: 14 countries with varying healthcare systems. Patients: 23 396 high-risk NSTE-ACS patients with complete initial data collection entered into GRACE between 1999 and 2006 were analysed. Interventions: Data were analysed according to delay-to-angiography and subsequent in-hospital or post-discharge adverse outcomes. Main outcome measures: Outcomes recorded included death, myocardial infarction, recurrent ischaemia, stroke, new heart failure and composite major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) comprising death, cerebrovascular accident and myocardial infarction. Revascularisation procedures were recorded. Results: 10 089 (43.1%) had no in-hospital angiography. Median delay-to-angiography was 46 hours; 3680 (34%) patients waited >72 hours. 9.3% waited >7 days before angiography. Patients waiting longest were more often older, diabetic, women and had a history of heart failure, previous myocardial infarction or hypertension. Recurrent in-hospital ischaemia (33% vs 22%), reinfarction (8.4% vs 5.0%) and heart failure (14% vs 9.1%) were more common with delayed angiography. Delayed angiography was associated with better outcomes than no angiography (MACE 18.9% vs 22.2%, p = 0.015). MACE rates within six months of admission were higher with longer delay-to-angiography and highest of all with no angiography. Conclusions: High-risk NSTE-ACS is suboptimally managed with 43% not undergoing angiography. One-third of those undergoing angiography are delayed >72 hours. Longer delays were more likely with higher risk, sicker patients. These delays were associated with adverse outcomes at six months. Very long delay was associated with lower MACE, but not mortality, compared to conservative management.
引用
收藏
页码:211 / 215
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Timing of coronary angiography in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: results from the Portuguese Registry for Acute Coronary Syndromes (ProACS)
    Carvalho, Catarina Ribeiro
    Bernardo, Marta Catarina
    Moreira, Isabel Martins
    Mateus, Pedro
    Baptista, Ana
    Moreira, Ilidio
    Portuguese Registry Acute Coronary Syndromes
    CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE, 2025, 36 (02) : 166 - 172
  • [2] Predicting freedom from clinical events in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
    Brieger, D.
    Fox, K. A. A.
    FitzGerald, G.
    Eagle, K. A.
    Budaj, A.
    Avezum, A.
    Granger, C. B.
    Costa, B.
    Anderson, F. A., Jr.
    Steg, Ph G.
    HEART, 2009, 95 (11) : 888 - 894
  • [3] Impact of catheterization delay on outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE)
    Sadiq, I
    Montalescot, G
    Dabbous, O
    Lim, M
    Gowda, N
    Mehta, R
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 92 (6A): : 231L - 232L
  • [4] Management and 6-month outcomes in elderly and very elderly patients with high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events
    Devlin, Gerard
    Gore, Joel M.
    Elliott, John
    Wijesinghe, Namal
    Eagle, Kim A.
    Avezum, Alvaro
    Huang, Wei
    Brieger, David
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2008, 29 (10) : 1275 - 1282
  • [5] Non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Stone, Gregg W.
    LANCET, 2007, 369 (9564): : 801 - 803
  • [6] Time to coronary angiography and outcomes among patients with high-risk non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndromes: Results from the SYNERGY trial
    Tricoci, Pierluigi
    Lokhnygina, Yuliya
    Berdan, Lisa G.
    Steinhubl, Steven R.
    Gulba, Dietrich C.
    White, Harvey D.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Aylward, Philip E.
    Langer, Anatoly
    Califf, Robert M.
    Ferguson, James J.
    Antman, Elliott M.
    Newby, L. Kristin
    Harrington, Robert A.
    Goodman, Shaun G.
    Mahaffey, Kenneth W.
    CIRCULATION, 2007, 116 (23) : 2669 - 2677
  • [7] Electrocardiogram risk stratification of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Birnbaum, Yochai
    Atar, Shaul
    JOURNAL OF ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2006, 39 (04) : S57 - S61
  • [8] Optimal timing of coronary angiography and potential intervention in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes
    Katritsis, Demosthenes G.
    Siontis, George C. M.
    Kastrati, Adnan
    van't Hof, Arnoud W. J.
    Neumann, Franz-Josef
    Siontis, Konstantinos C. M.
    Ioannidis, John P. A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (01) : 32 - 40
  • [9] The sooner the better? What is the optimal timing for coronary angiography in high-risk non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
    Carvalho, C.
    Bernardo, M.
    Moreira, I
    Azevedo, L.
    Fernandes, I
    Mateus, P.
    Baptista, A.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2024, 45
  • [10] Evidence-based risk stratification is not optimally used to target proven therapies in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: The global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE)
    Oliveira, GB
    Avezum, A
    Anderson, FA
    Dabbous, OH
    Budaj, A
    Goldberg, RJ
    Brieger, D
    Fox, KA
    Granger, CB
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 659 - 659