Do IRBs Pass the Minimal Harm Test?

被引：4
|
作者：
Ceci, Stephen J. [1 ]
Bruck, Maggie [2 ]
机构：
[1] Cornell Univ, Dept Human Dev, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
来源：
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE | 2009年 / 4卷 / 01期
关键词：
D O I：
10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01084.x
中图分类号：
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号：
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要：
We describe examples of institutional review board (IRB) actions that have delayed or thwarted research that could not conceivably be considered to pose more than minimal risk to participants. We propose three changes to improve the IRB process and reduce both human and financial costs.
引用
收藏
页码：28 / 29
页数：2
相关论文
共 50 条
12345