Calculating the benefit of conservation actions

被引:110
|
作者
Maron, Martine [1 ]
Rhodes, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Gibbons, Philip [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Landscape Ecol & Conservat Grp, Sch Geog Planning & Environm Management, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Fenner Sch Environm & Soc, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
来源
CONSERVATION LETTERS | 2013年 / 6卷 / 05期
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Additionality; agri-environment schemes; biodiversity offsets; conservation benefit; conservation decision-making; counterfactual scenario; reserve selection; NEW-SOUTH-WALES; BIODIVERSITY OFFSETS; RESERVE SELECTION; VULNERABILITY; HABITAT; IRREPLACEABILITY; PRIORITIZATION; INVESTMENT; PROTECTION; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/conl.12007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The benefit (or additionality) attributable to a conservation action is the difference between the outcomes of two scenarios: (1) the scenario with the conservation action, and (2) the alternative scenario, in which action did not occur. However, many conservation decisions are made using approaches that do not appropriately calculate this benefit. We review recent scientific literature and conservation policies to examine how conservation benefit is calculated in three situations: systematic reserve selection, investment in agri-environment schemes, and biodiversity offset trades. In the examples we considered, the approaches used to calculate conservation benefit often involved assumptions about the alternative scenario that were not explicit, demonstrably wrong or both. We suggest that assumptions about how conservation value changes over time in the alternative scenario can often be substantially refined, and that making these assumptions explicit by calculating directly the expected difference between the two scenarios is likely to improve the quality of conservation decision-making.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 367
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] CALCULATING CONSERVATION
    CROSS, JM
    SOIL CONSERVATION, 1976, 41 (09): : 6 - 9
  • [2] Cost-benefit based prioritisation of orangutan conservation actions in Indonesian Borneo
    Morgans, Courtney L.
    Santika, Truly
    Meijaard, Erik
    Ancrenaz, Marc
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2019, 238
  • [3] CALCULATING THE REAL BENEFIT OF TRAINING
    MOAD, J
    DATAMATION, 1995, 41 (07): : 45 - 47
  • [4] Calculating the benefit of a negative endoscopy
    Sonnenberg, A
    Lieberman, DA
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (05) : 752 - 754
  • [5] Calculating and Interpreting ICERs and Net Benefit
    Paulden, Mike
    PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2020, 38 (08) : 785 - 807
  • [6] Calculating and Interpreting ICERs and Net Benefit
    Mike Paulden
    PharmacoEconomics, 2020, 38 : 785 - 807
  • [7] Calculating the Environmental Benefit of Reuse Platforms
    Rückert A.
    Balkute G.
    Dornack C.
    Circular Economy and Sustainability, 2024, 4 (3): : 1913 - 1936
  • [8] Conservation actions benefit the most threatened species: A 13-year assessment of Alliance for Zero Extinction species
    Luther, David
    Cooper, William Justin
    Wong, Jesse
    Walker, Margaretta
    Farinelli, Sarah
    Visseren-Hamakers, Ingrid
    Burfield, Ian J.
    Simkins, Ashley
    Bunting, Gill
    Brooks, Thomas M.
    Dicks, Kara
    Scott, Janet
    Westrip, James R. S.
    Lamoreux, John
    Parr, Mike
    Silva, Naamal
    Foster, Matt
    Upgren, Amy
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    CONSERVATION SCIENCE AND PRACTICE, 2021, 3 (10)
  • [9] The evolutionary impacts of conservation actions
    Shefferson, Richard P.
    Mason, Chase M.
    Kellett, Kimberly M.
    Goolsby, Eric W.
    Coughlin, Erin
    Flynn, R. Wes
    POPULATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 60 (1-2) : 49 - 59
  • [10] CALCULATING EFFECTIVENESS OF WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES
    WALSKI, TM
    RICHARDS, WG
    MCCALL, DJ
    DEB, AK
    MORGAN, JM
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1985, 111 (02): : 209 - 221