No-till and mulching enhance energy use efficiency and reduce carbon footprint of a direct-seeded upland rice production system

被引:66
|
作者
Yadav, Gulab Singh [1 ]
Babu, Subhash [2 ,5 ]
Das, Anup [1 ]
Mohapatra, K. P. [3 ,6 ]
Singh, Raghavendra [4 ]
Avasthe, R. K. [4 ]
Roy, Saptamita [1 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Res Complex North Eastern Hill Reg, Tripura Ctr, Lembucherra 799210, Tripura, India
[2] ICAR Res Complex North Eastern Hill Reg, Umroi Rd, Umiam 793103, Meghalaya, India
[3] World Agroforestry Ctr ICRAF, United Nat Ave, Nairobi 30677, Kenya
[4] ICAR Natl Organ Farming Res Inst, Gangtok 737102, Sikkim, India
[5] ICAR Indian Agr Res Inst, Div Agron, New Delhi 110012, India
[6] ICAR Natl Bur Plant Genet Resources, Div Germplasm Evaluat, New Delhi 110012, India
关键词
Clean production technology; Conservation agriculture; Economic productivity; Fragile hill ecosystem; Green house gas intensity; GREENHOUSE-GAS CONTRIBUTIONS; CLEANER PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEMS; CO2; EMISSIONS; AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES; SOIL; CONSERVATION; MITIGATION; IMPACT; WHEAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122700
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Sustainability of conventional agricultural production systems is threatened by triple challenges of energy and environmental crises, deteriorating natural resources bases, and declining farm profitability. Current agricultural management practices (energy-intensive, inefficient external and natural input use, and crop biomass burning) are negatively impacting the ecosystem services which are the principal drivers for food security and human survival. Hence, there is a need to shift from unsustainable production practices to cleaner production systems. Energy use, carbon footprint (CF), and economic sustainability are important indicators of any clean production systems. Thus, a hypothesis was formulated that no-till (NT) cultivation along with mulching can provide an environmentally clean crop production practice that can enhance energy use efficiency, economic profitability, and reduce the CF. Therefore, the present experiment was conducted for four consecutive years (2012-15) to evaluate the energy budget, CF, and economics of NT along with bio-mulching for a cleaner upland rice production system. The experiment comprised of two tillage practices i.e., conventional tillage (CT) and NT in main plots and four bio- mulches in subplots i.e., rice straw mulch (RSM), Gliricidia sepium mulch (GLM), brown manuring mulch (BMM) of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata), and no mulch (NM) as a control. Results revealed that the adoption of NT curtailed energy use by 48.50%, specific energy by 49.63%, CF by 16.48%, and cost of cultivation by 35% in addition to enhancing energy use efficiency and benefit to cost ratio in comparison to CT. It was also observed that mulching, particularly the BMM, boosted the energy use efficiency, economic productivity, net returns, and benefit to cost ratio over NM. The results suggested that NT with BMM is an environmentally clean production technology to enhance the energy use efficiency, besides reducing the CF of direct-seeded upland rice production system in the Eastern Himalayas and similar eco-regions of the world. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Energy budget and carbon footprint in a no-till and mulch based rice mustard cropping system
    Yadav, Gulab Singh
    Das, Anup
    Lal, Rattan
    Babu, Subhash
    Meena, Ram Swaroop
    Saha, Poulami
    Singh, Raghavendra
    Datta, Mrinmoy
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 191 : 144 - 157
  • [2] Optimizing Nutrient and Energy Efficiency in a Direct-Seeded Rice Production System: A Northwestern Punjab Case Study
    Kaur, Ranjot
    Chhina, Gurbax Singh
    Kaur, Mandeep
    Bhatt, Rajan
    Elhindi, Khalid M.
    Mattar, Mohamed A.
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (04):
  • [3] Dry direct-seeded rice-wheat rotation system: Lower water and carbon footprint and higher carbon production efficiency and net ecosystem economic benefits
    Jin, Zhaoqiang
    Harrison, Matthew Tom
    Liu, Ke
    Nie, Lixiao
    FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2024, 309
  • [4] Dry Direct-Seeded Rice Yield and Water Use Efficiency as Affected by Biodegradable Film Mulching in the Northeastern Region of China
    Zhao, Zijun
    He, Wenqing
    Chen, Guangfeng
    Yan, Changrong
    Gao, Haihe
    Liu, Qin
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (02):
  • [5] Production potential and economics of direct-seeded upland rice (Oryza sativa) based intercropping system with grain legumes
    Ramamoorthy, K
    Balasubramanian, A
    Arokiaraj, A
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 1997, 42 (04) : 725 - 726
  • [6] Dry direct-seeded rice has higher energy and carbon production efficiencies without reducing economic benefits
    Jin, Zhaoqiang
    Mu, Yixue
    Li, Yusheng
    Nie, Lixiao
    JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE, 2023, 103 (12) : 6044 - 6054
  • [7] Precision Nutrient Management in Zero-Till Direct-Seeded Rice Influences the Productivity, Profitability, Nutrient, and Water Use Efficiency as Well as the Environmental Footprint in the Indo Gangetic Plain of India
    Sadhukhan, Rahul
    Kumar, Dinesh
    Sen, Suman
    Sepat, Seema
    Ghosh, Avijit
    Shivay, Yashbir Singh
    Meena, Mahesh Chand
    Anand, Anjali
    Kumar, Rajesh
    Sharma, Laimayum Devarishi
    Patra, Kiranmoy
    Pratap, Vijay
    Alsuhaibani, Amnah Mohammed
    Gaber, Ahmed
    Hossain, Akbar
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2023, 13 (04):
  • [8] Insights into the effects of anilofos on direct-seeded rice production system through untargeted metabolomics
    Wang, Weitao
    Long, Jiahuan
    Wang, Huaixu
    Huang, Wenyuan
    Zhang, Ying
    Duan, Tingting
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 360
  • [9] Genotypic Differences for Water-Use Efficiency and Weed Competitiveness in Dry Direct-Seeded Rice
    Mahajan, G.
    Ramesha, M. S.
    Chauhan, B. S.
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2015, 107 (04) : 1573 - 1583
  • [10] Grain yield and N use efficiency of direct-seeded rice under different N management practices aimed to reduce N input
    Jiang, Peng
    Xu, Fuxian
    Zhang, Lin
    Liu, Mao
    Xiong, Hong
    Guo, Xiaoyi
    Zhu, Yongchuan
    Zhou, Xingbing
    ARCHIVES OF AGRONOMY AND SOIL SCIENCE, 2021, 67 (11) : 1578 - 1590