Nuclear new build in the United States 1990-2010: A three state analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Heffron, Raphael J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Judge Business Sch, Elect Policy Res Grp, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Cambridge, England
关键词
Nuclear energy policy; Nuclear new build; Technology; Lessons learned; State law; Public administration; POLICY; ECONOMICS; POWER; CHERNOBYL; ERA;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2012.10.023
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This research examines nuclear energy policy across three states in the United States (US) Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Texas - from 1990 to 2010. Therefore, the nuclear energy crisis at Fukushima in Japan March 2011 is beyond the scope of this paper. Nevertheless, the fundamental conclusions of this research remain valid, as the impact of Fukushima is not yet known and in addition the US has experienced its own crisis in Three Mile Island, which has shaped its own nuclear industry to an extent already. Interviews are at the core of the research methodology employed, which is similar to other in-depth studies on nuclear new build. The aim of this paper is to identify and clarify those aspects of the legal, economic, and political requirements of the US that affect prospects for nuclear new build but which, so far, have not been well understood by experts. The research provides these new insights through a unique comparison of US states which have deregulated, regulated and 'hybrid' electricity markets. It is evident that law can play a central role in the nuclear energy sector, and the role of state-driven policy in the nuclear energy sector is also demonstrated. Further, the methodology identifies key assumptions within the nuclear sector in the US that are contested, and delivers lessons on how these contested issues may be resolved. The paper adds to the literature in public administration, legal development and nuclear energy policy, and in particular nuclear new build. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:876 / 892
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nuclear energy policy in the United States 1990-2010: A federal or state responsibility?
    Heffron, Raphael J.
    ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 62 : 254 - 266
  • [2] Romanian nuclear new build: Progress amidst turbulence 1990-2010
    Heffron, Raphael James
    PROGRESS IN NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2012, 56 : 43 - 60
  • [3] Racial Inequality in Brazil and the United States, 1990-2010
    Andrews, George Reid
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL HISTORY, 2014, 47 (04) : 829 - 854
  • [4] Blastomycosis Mortality Rates, United States, 1990-2010
    Khuu, Diana
    Shafir, Shira
    Bristow, Benjamin
    Sorvillo, Frank
    EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2014, 20 (11) : 1789 - 1794
  • [5] Racial Inequality in Brazil and the United States, 1990-2010
    Andrews, George Reid
    BRESIL-S, 2014, 5 : 219 - 247
  • [6] Patterns of Colorectal Cancer Care in the United States: 1990-2010
    Murphy, Caitlin C.
    Harlan, Linda C.
    Lund, Jennifer L.
    Lynch, Charles F.
    Geiger, Ann M.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2015, 107 (10):
  • [7] Patterns of Racial Diversity and Segregation in the United States: 1990-2010
    Wright, Richard
    Ellis, Mark
    Holloway, Steven R.
    Wong, Sandy
    PROFESSIONAL GEOGRAPHER, 2014, 66 (02): : 173 - 182
  • [8] Black: White Health Disparities in the United States and Chicago: 1990-2010
    Hunt, Bijou
    Whitman, Steve
    JOURNAL OF RACIAL AND ETHNIC HEALTH DISPARITIES, 2015, 2 (01) : 93 - 100
  • [9] Changes in Diabetes-Related Complications in the United States, 1990-2010
    Gregg, Edward W.
    Li, Yanfeng
    Wang, Jing
    Burrows, Nilka Rios
    Ali, Mohammed K.
    Rolka, Deborah
    Williams, Desmond E.
    Geiss, Linda
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 370 (16): : 1514 - 1523
  • [10] Widening Life Expectancy Advantage of Hispanics in the United States: 1990-2010
    Fenelon, Andrew
    Blue, Laura
    JOURNAL OF IMMIGRANT AND MINORITY HEALTH, 2015, 17 (04) : 1130 - 1137