Testing strategies for embryo-fetal toxicity of human pharmaceuticals. Animal models vs. in vitro approaches A workshop report

被引:27
|
作者
van der Laan, Jan Willem [1 ]
Chapin, Robert E. [2 ]
Haenen, Bert [3 ]
Jacobs, Abigail C. [4 ]
Piersma, Aldert [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Med Evaluat Board, NL-3503 RG Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Pfizer Global R&D, Dev & Reprod Toxicol Grp, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[3] 3 D PharmXchange, NL-5026 SK Tilburg, Netherlands
[4] FDA, CDER, ONDIO, Silver Spring, MD USA
[5] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm RIVM, Lab Hlth Protect Res, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Inst Risk assessment Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Rat and rabbit reproductive toxicity; Embryonic stem cell tests; Zebrafish testing; Developmental and reproductive toxicity; Human pharmaceuticals; Validation and evaluation; International Harmonisation; STEM-CELL TEST; DEVELOPMENTAL TOXICITY; EMBRYOTOXICITY TESTS; TEST EST; ZEBRAFISH; ASSAY; VIVO; RAT; RECOMMENDATIONS; CHEMICALS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2012.03.009
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Reproductive toxicity testing is characterized by high animal use. For registration of pharmaceutical compounds, developmental toxicity studies are usually conducted in both rat and rabbits. Efforts have been underway for a long time to design alternatives to animal use. Implementation has lagged, partly because of uncertainties about the applicability domain of the alternatives. The reproductive cycle is complex and not all mechanisms of development can be mimicked in vitro. Therefore, efforts are underway to characterize the available alternative tests with regard to the mechanism of action they include. One alternative test is the mouse embryonic stem cell test (EST), which has been studied since the late 1990s. It is a genuine 3R "alternative" assay as it is essentially animal-free. A meeting was held to review the state-of-the-art of various in vitro models for prediction of developmental toxicity. Although the predictivity of individual assays is improving, a battery of several assays is likely to have even higher predictivity, which is necessary for regulatory acceptance. The workshop concluded that an important first step is a thorough survey of the existing rat and rabbit studies, to fully characterize the frequency of responses and the types of effects seen. At the same time, it is important to continue the optimization of in vitro assays. As more experience accumulates, the optimal conditions, assay structure, and applicability of the alternative assays are expected to emerge. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 123
页数:9
相关论文
共 3 条
  • [1] Nanosafety vs. nanotoxicology: adequate animal models for testing in vivo toxicity of nanoparticles
    Chrishtop, Vladimir V.
    Prilepskii, Artur Y.
    Nikonorova, Varvara G.
    Mironov, Vladimir A.
    TOXICOLOGY, 2021, 462
  • [2] Achieving scientific and regulatory success in implementing non-animal approaches to human and veterinary rabies vaccine testing: A NICEATM and JABS workshop report
    Poston, Rebecca
    Hill, Richard
    Allen, Cynthia
    Casey, Warren
    Gatewood, Donna
    Levis, Robin
    Mallet, Laurent
    Smith, Dean
    Srinivas, Geetha
    Stirling, Catrina
    Allen, David
    BIOLOGICALS, 2019, 60 : 8 - 14
  • [3] IFPA meeting 2014 workshop report: Animal models to study pregnancy pathologies; new approaches to study human placental exposure to xenobiotics; biomarkers of pregnancy pathologies; placental genetics and epigenetics; the placenta and stillbirth and fetal growth restriction
    Barbaux, S.
    Erwich, J. J. H. M.
    Favaron, P. O.
    Gil, S.
    Gallot, D.
    Golos, T. G.
    Gonzalez-Bulnes, A.
    Guibourdenche, J.
    Heazell, A. E. P.
    Jansson, T.
    Laprevote, O.
    Lewis, R. M.
    Miller, R. K.
    Monk, D.
    Novakovic, B.
    Oudejans, C.
    Parast, M.
    Peugnet, P.
    Pfarrer, C.
    Pinar, H.
    Roberts, C. T.
    Robinson, W.
    Saffery, R.
    Salomon, C.
    Sexton, A.
    Staff, A. C.
    Suter, M.
    Tarrade, A.
    Wallace, J.
    Vaillancourt, C.
    Vaiman, D.
    Worton, S. A.
    Lash, G. E.
    PLACENTA, 2015, 36 : S5 - S10