Acarbose binding at the surface of Saccharomycopsis fibuligera glucoamylase suggests the presence of a raw starch-binding site

被引:0
|
作者
Gasperík, J [1 ]
Hostinová, E [1 ]
Sevcík, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Slovak Acad Sci, Inst Mol Biol, SK-84551 Bratislava, Slovakia
关键词
glucoamylase; acarbose; X-ray structure; starch-binding site; sugar tongs;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There are two acarbose molecules in the structure of the complex of glucoamylase from Saccharomycopsis fibuligera HUT 7212 (Glu) with the inhibitor acarbose: one is bound to the active site, which is localized in the cavity of the (alpha/alpha)(6)-barrel, the other one is on the surface of the enzyme molecule curved wound Tyr464, which captures the inhibitor molecule as seen in the "sugar tongs" binding site of the barley alpha-amylase isozyme I complexed with a thiomaltooligosaccharide. The surface acarbose molecule suggests the presence of a raw starch-binding site. Based on the expected similarity of structures of glucoamylase Glu, which does not degrade raw starch, and the raw starch-degrading glucoamylase from S. fibuligera IFO 0111 (Glm), it is reasonable to expect the presence of a starch-binding site, at a structurally equivalent position, also on the surface of Glm. Verification of this hypothesis by preparation of mutants of glucoamylases Glu and Glm is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 170
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Structure of the complex of a yeast glucoamylase with acarbose reveals the presence of a raw starch binding site on the catalytic domain
    Sevcík, J
    Hostinová, E
    Solovicová, A
    Gasperík, J
    Dauter, Z
    Wilson, KS
    FEBS JOURNAL, 2006, 273 (10) : 2161 - 2171
  • [2] Expression in Aspergillus niger of the starch-binding domain of glucoamylase Comparison with the proteolytically produced starch-binding domain
    Le, Gal-Coeffet, M.-F.
    Jacks, A. J.
    Sorimachi, K.
    Williamson, M. P.
    European Journal of Biochemistry, 233 (02):
  • [3] The starch-binding domain from glucoamylase disrupts the structure of starch
    Southall, SM
    Simpson, PJ
    Gilbert, HJ
    Williamson, G
    Williamson, MP
    FEBS LETTERS, 1999, 447 (01) : 58 - 60
  • [4] Deletion analysis of the starch-binding domain of Aspergillus glucoamylase
    Chen, LJ
    Coutinho, PM
    Nikolov, Z
    Ford, C
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 1995, 8 (10): : 1049 - 1055
  • [5] Starch-binding domain shuffling in Aspergillus niger glucoamylase
    Cornett, CAG
    Fang, TY
    Reilly, PJ
    Ford, C
    PROTEIN ENGINEERING, 2003, 16 (07): : 521 - 529
  • [6] EXPRESSION IN ASPERGILLUS-NIGER OF THE STARCH-BINDING DOMAIN OF GLUCOAMYLASE - COMPARISON WITH THE PROTEOLYTICALLY PRODUCED STARCH-BINDING DOMAIN
    LEGALCOEFFET, MF
    JACKS, AJ
    SORIMACHI, K
    WILLIAMSON, MP
    WILLIAMSON, G
    ARCHER, DB
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1995, 233 (02): : 561 - 567
  • [7] Thermodynamics of binding of heterobidentate ligands consisting of spacer-connected acarbose and β-cyclodextrin to the catalytic and starch-binding domains of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger shows that the catalytic and starch-binding sites are in close proximity in space
    Sigurskjold, BW
    Christensen, T
    Payre, N
    Cottaz, S
    Driguez, H
    Svensson, B
    BIOCHEMISTRY, 1998, 37 (29) : 10446 - 10452
  • [8] Starch degradation by glucoamylase Glm from Saccharomycopsis fibuligera IFO 0111 in the presence and absence of a commercial pullulanase
    Valachova, Katarina
    Horvathova, Viera
    CHEMISTRY & BIODIVERSITY, 2007, 4 (05) : 874 - 880
  • [9] Crystal structure of the starch-binding domain of glucoamylase from Aspergillus niger
    Suyama, Yousuke
    Muraki, Norifumi
    Kusunoki, Masami
    Miyake, Hideo
    ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION F-STRUCTURAL BIOLOGY COMMUNICATIONS, 2017, 73 : 550 - 554
  • [10] Introduction of raw starch-binding domains into Bacillus subtilis α-amylase by fusion with the starch-binding domain of Bacillus cyclomaltodextrin glucanotransferase
    Ohdan, K
    Kuriki, T
    Takata, H
    Kaneko, H
    Okada, S
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2000, 66 (07) : 3058 - 3064