How Are Gender Equality and Human Rights Interventions Included in Sexual and Reproductive Health Programmes and Policies: A Systematic Review of Existing Research Foci and Gaps

被引:24
|
作者
Hartmann, Miriam [1 ]
Khosla, Rajat [2 ]
Krishnan, Suneeta [1 ,3 ]
George, Asha [4 ]
Gruskin, Sofia [5 ]
Amin, Avni [2 ]
机构
[1] RTI Int, Womens Global Hlth Imperat, San Francisco, CA 94104 USA
[2] WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Res Triangle Inst Global India Private Ltd, New Delhi, India
[4] Univ Western Cape, Sch Publ Hlth, Cape Town, South Africa
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Program Global Hlth & Human Rights, Los Angeles, CA USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2016年 / 11卷 / 12期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
WORKERS; HIV; EXPERIENCES; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0167542
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The importance of promoting gender equality and human rights in sexual and reproductive health (SRH) programmes and policies has been affirmed in numerous international and regional agreements, most recently the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Given the critical role of research to determine what works, we aimed to identify research gaps as part of a broader priority setting exercise on integrating gender equality and human rights approaches in SRH programmes and policies. A systematic literature review of reviews was conducted to examine the question: what do we know about how research in the context of SRH programmes and policies has addressed gender equality and human rights and what are the current gaps in research. We searched three data-bases for reviews that addressed the research question, were published between 19942014, and met methodological standards for systematic reviews, qualitative meta-syntheses and other reviews of relevance to the research question. Additional grey literature was identified based on expert input. Articles were appraised by the primary author and examined by an expert panel. An abstraction and thematic analysis process was used to synthesize findings. Of the 3,073 abstracts identified, 56 articles were reviewed in full and 23 were included along with 10 from the grey literature. The majority focused on interventions addressing gender inequalities; very few reviews explicitly included human rights based interventions. Across both topics, weak study designs and use of intermediate outcome measures limited evidence quality. Further, there was limited evidence on interventions that addressed marginalized groups. Better quality studies, longer-term indicators, and measurement of unintended consequences are needed to better understand the impact of these types of interventions on SRH outcomes. Further efforts are needed to cover research on gender equality and human rights issues as they pertain to a broader set of SRH topics and populations.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Advancing the "sexual" in sexual and reproductive health and rights: a global health, gender equality and human rights imperative
    Ghebreyesus, Tedros Adhanom
    Allotey, Pascale
    Narasimhan, Manjulaa
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION, 2024, 102 (01) : 77 - 78
  • [2] Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: an evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Amin, Avni
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Lynn, Fiona
    van Willenswaard, Kyrsten Corbijn
    Reid, Esther
    Khosla, Rajat
    Lohan, Maria
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2019, 4 (05):
  • [3] Interventions addressing men, masculinities, and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health and rights: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Amin, Avni
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Lynn, Fiona
    van Willenswaard, Kyrsten Corbijn
    Reid, Esther
    Khosla, Rajat
    Lohan, Maria
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 37 (05) : 10 - 10
  • [4] Interventions Promoting Child Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in LMICs: A Systematic Review
    Fantaye, Arone Wondwossen
    Buh, Amos Wung
    Idriss-Wheeler, Dina
    Fournier, Karine
    Yaya, Sanni
    [J]. PEDIATRICS, 2022, 149
  • [5] Interventions addressing men, masculinities and gender equality in sexual and reproductive health: An evidence and gap map and systematic review of reviews
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Lynn, Fiona
    Reid, Esther
    Khosla, Rajat
    Amin, Avni
    Lohan, Maria
    [J]. CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 14 (01)
  • [6] Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
    Perrotta, Carla
    Downey, Vicky
    Elabbasy, Darin
    Ingram, Carolyn
    Lo, Chungwan
    Naseer, Amara
    Thorson, Anna
    Brizuela, Vanessa
    [J]. BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [7] Remote training for strengthening capacity in sexual and reproductive health and rights research: a systematic review
    Carla Perrotta
    Vicky Downey
    Darin Elabbasy
    Carolyn Ingram
    Chungwan Lo
    Amara Naseer
    Anna Thorson
    Vanessa Brizuela
    [J]. BMC Public Health, 23
  • [8] HOW DOES STIGMA INFORM SEXUAL AND GENDER MINORITY HEALTH INTERVENTIONS? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Carter, Joseph A.
    Layland, Eric K.
    Perry, Nicholas
    Szalay, Jorge Cienfuegos
    Nelson, Kimberly M.
    Bonner, Courtney Peasant
    Rendina, H. Jonathon
    [J]. ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2020, 54 : S381 - S381
  • [9] Impact of COVID-19 on Gender Equality, Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights of Adolescent Girls and Young Women: A Narrative Review
    Kumar, Naina
    Singh, Amit Kant
    [J]. CURRENT WOMENS HEALTH REVIEWS, 2022, 18 (03) : 6 - 12
  • [10] Gender-transformative programming with men and boys to improve sexual and reproductive health and rights: a systematic review of intervention studies
    Ruane-McAteer, Eimear
    Gillespie, Kathryn
    Amin, Avni
    Aventin, Aine
    Robinson, Martin
    Hanratty, Jennifer
    Khosla, Rajat
    Lohan, Maria
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (10):