A multiple imputation-based sensitivity analysis approach for data subject to missing not at random

被引:13
|
作者
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [1 ]
He, Yulei [2 ]
Hu, Chengcheng [1 ]
Zhou, Wei [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth, Tucson, AZ USA
[2] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Hlth Stat, Hyattsville, MD USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Surg, Tucson, MI USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
correlation coefficient; missing not at random; multiple imputation; selection model; sensitivity analysis;
D O I
10.1002/sim.8691
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Missingness mechanism is in theory unverifiable based only on observed data. If there is a suspicion of missing not at random, researchers often perform a sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of various missingness mechanisms. In general, sensitivity analysis approaches require a full specification of the relationship between missing values and missingness probabilities. Such relationship can be specified based on a selection model, a pattern-mixture model or a shared parameter model. Under the selection modeling framework, we propose a sensitivity analysis approach using a nonparametric multiple imputation strategy. The proposed approach only requires specifying the correlation coefficient between missing values and selection (response) probabilities under a selection model. The correlation coefficient is a standardized measure and can be used as a natural sensitivity analysis parameter. The sensitivity analysis involves multiple imputations of missing values, yet the sensitivity parameter is only used to select imputing/donor sets. Hence, the proposed approach might be more robust against misspecifications of the sensitivity parameter. For illustration, the proposed approach is applied to incomplete measurements of level of preoperative Hemoglobin A1c, for patients who had high-grade carotid artery stenosisa and were scheduled for surgery. A simulation study is conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed approach.
引用
收藏
页码:3756 / 3771
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A multiple imputation-based sensitivity analysis approach for regression analysis with an missing not at random covariate
    Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh
    He, Yulei
    Hu, Chengcheng
    Zhou, Wei
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2023, 42 (14) : 2275 - 2292
  • [2] Sensitivity analysis after multiple imputation under missing at random: a weighting approach
    Carpenter, James R.
    Kenward, Michael G.
    White, Ian R.
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2007, 16 (03) : 259 - 275
  • [3] Multiple imputation of ordinal missing not at random data
    Hammon, Angelina
    [J]. ASTA-ADVANCES IN STATISTICAL ANALYSIS, 2023, 107 (04) : 671 - 692
  • [4] Multiple imputation of ordinal missing not at random data
    Angelina Hammon
    [J]. AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, 2023, 107 : 671 - 692
  • [5] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR NOT-AT-RANDOM MISSING DATA IN TRIAL-BASED COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS USING MULTIPLE IMPUTATION
    Leurent, B.
    Gomes, M.
    Faria, R.
    Morris, S.
    Grieve, R.
    Carpenter, J.
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2018, 21 : S14 - S14
  • [6] Imputation-based semiparametric estimation for INAR(1) processes with missing data
    Xiong, Wei
    Wang, Dehui
    Wang, Xinyang
    [J]. HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2020, 49 (05): : 1843 - 1864
  • [7] Multiple imputation of binary multilevel missing not at random data
    Hammon, Angelina
    Zinn, Sabine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2020, 69 (03) : 547 - 564
  • [8] Imputation-based strategies for clinical trial longitudinal data with nonignorable missing values
    Yang, Xiaowei
    Li, Jinhui
    Shoptaw, Steven
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2008, 27 (15) : 2826 - 2849
  • [9] Sensitivity Analysis of Missing Data: Case Studies Using Model-Based Multiple Imputation
    Zhang, Jie
    [J]. DRUG INFORMATION JOURNAL, 2009, 43 (04): : 475 - 484
  • [10] Missing not at random in end of life care studies: multiple imputation and sensitivity analysis on data from the ACTION study
    Carreras, Giulia
    Miccinesi, Guido
    Wilcock, Andrew
    Preston, Nancy
    Nieboer, Daan
    Deliens, Luc
    Groenvold, Mogensm
    Lunder, Urska
    van der Heide, Agnes
    Baccini, Michela
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2021, 21 (01)