A framework for evaluating ecosystem services provided by cover crops in agroecosystems

被引:415
|
作者
Schipanski, Meagan E. [1 ,3 ]
Barbercheck, Mary [2 ]
Douglas, Margaret R. [2 ]
Finney, Denise M. [3 ,5 ]
Haider, Kristin [1 ]
Kaye, Jason P. [3 ]
Kemanian, Armen R. [1 ]
Mortensen, David A. [1 ,3 ]
Ryan, Matthew R. [4 ]
Tooker, John [2 ]
White, Charlie [3 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Plant Sci, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Penn State Univ, Dept Entomol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[3] Penn State Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[4] Cornell Univ, Dept Crop & Soil Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[5] Penn State Univ, Intercoll Grad Degree Program Ecol, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Green manures; Ecosystem services; Multifunctionality; Trade-offs; Cropping systems; Temporal dynamics; ARBUSCULAR MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI; GROUND BEETLES COLEOPTERA; CROPPING SYSTEMS; WEED MANAGEMENT; ACTIVITY-DENSITY; GREEN MANURE; WINTER-WHEAT; NITRATE LOSS; FIELD CORN; TILLAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2013.11.004
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Cropping systems that provide ecosystem services beyond crop production are gaining interest from farmers, policy makers and society at large, yet we lack frameworks to evaluate and manage for multiple ecosystem services. Using the example of integrating cover crops into annual crop rotations, we present an assessment framework that: (1) estimates the temporal dynamics of a suite of ecosystem services; (2) illustrates ecosystem multifunctionality using spider plots; and (3) identifies key time points for optimizing ecosystem service benefits and minimizing trade-offs. Using quantitative models and semi-quantitative estimates, we applied the framework to analyze the temporal dynamics of 11 ecosystem services and two economic metrics when cover crops are introduced into a 3-year soybean (Glycine max)-wheat (Triticum aestivum)-corn (Zea mays) rotation in a typical Mid-Atlantic climate. We estimated that cover crops could increase 8 of 11 ecosystem services without negatively influencing crop yields. We demonstrate that when we measure ecosystem services matters and cumulative assessments can be misleading due to the episodic nature of some services and the time sensitivity of management windows. For example, nutrient retention benefits occurred primarily during cover crop growth, weed suppression benefits occurred during cash crop growth through a cover crop legacy effect, and soil carbon benefits accrued slowly over decades. Uncertainties exist in estimating cover crop effects on several services, such as pest dynamics. Trade-offs occurred between cover crop ecosystem benefits, production costs, and management risks. Differences in production costs with and without cover crops varied 3-fold over 10 years, largely due to changes in fertilizer prices, and thus cover crop use will become more economical with increasing fertilizer prices or if modest cost-sharing programs are established. Frameworks such as that presented here provide the means to quantify ecosystem services and facilitate the transition to more multifunctional agricultural systems. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Framework of the Maintenance Ecosystem Services Provided by Agroecosystems on the Territory of Bulgaria
    Kenarova, Anelia
    Tzonev, Rossen
    Boteva, Silvena
    Bogoev, Valentin
    Nikolov, Marian
    Pachedjieva, Kalina
    Traykov, Ivan
    Simeonovska-Nikolova, Daniela
    Dimitrov, Krastio
    Stefanov, Vladimir
    Bakardjieva, Hristina
    Dimitrova, Tsveta
    Nachev, Georgi
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY EARTH SCIENCES SYMPOSIUM (WMESS 2017), 2017, 95
  • [2] Ecosystem Services Provided by Cover Crops and Biofumigation in Sunflower Cultivation
    Ait Kaci Ahmed, Neila
    Galaup, Benoit
    Desplanques, Jeremy
    Dechamp-Guillaume, Gregory
    Seassau, Celia
    [J]. AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2022, 12 (01):
  • [3] Cover Crops Under Cover: Evaluating Ecosystem Services of Cover Crops in Year-Round High Tunnel Production Systems
    Wszelaki, Annette
    Moore, Jennifer
    Haramoto, Erin
    Gaskin, Julia
    Shrestha, Debendra
    Taylor, Jennifer
    Jacobsen, Krista
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2019, 54 (09) : S80 - S80
  • [4] Quantitative synthesis on the ecosystem services of cover crops
    Daryanto, Stefani
    Fu, Bojie
    Wang, Lixin
    Jacinthe, Pierre-Andre
    Zhao, Wenwu
    [J]. EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2018, 185 : 357 - 373
  • [5] Ecosystem services of cover crops: a research roadmap
    Lamichhane, Jay Ram
    Alletto, Lionel
    [J]. TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, 2022, 27 (08) : 758 - 768
  • [6] Ecosystem provision services provided by agroecosystems of family gardens in the State of Mexico
    Arcos Severo, Minerva
    Gutierrez Cedillo, Jesus Gaston
    Balderas Plata, Miguel Angel
    Martinez Garcia, Carlos Galdino
    [J]. REVISTA DE BIOLOGIA TROPICAL, 2021, 69 (03) : 1069 - 1078
  • [7] Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops
    Rapidel, Bruno
    Ripoche, Aude
    Allinne, Clementine
    Metay, Aurelie
    Deheuvels, Olivier
    Lamanda, Nathalie
    Blazy, Jean-Marc
    Valdes-Gomez, Hector
    Gary, Christian
    [J]. AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (04) : 1373 - 1390
  • [8] Nitrogen services provided by interseeded cover crops in organic corn systems
    Isbell, Sarah Abigail
    Alonso-Ayuso, Maria
    Bell, Terrence H.
    Bradley, Brosi
    Rowles, Taran
    Kaye, Jason P.
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2022, 114 (04) : 2458 - 2472
  • [9] Analysis of ecosystem services trade-offs to design agroecosystems with perennial crops
    Bruno Rapidel
    Aude Ripoche
    Clémentine Allinne
    Aurélie Metay
    Olivier Deheuvels
    Nathalie Lamanda
    Jean-Marc Blazy
    Héctor Valdés-Gómez
    Christian Gary
    [J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 : 1373 - 1390
  • [10] Ecosystem Services Provided by Agroecosystems: A Qualitative and Quantitative Assessment of this Relationship in the Pampa Region, Argentina
    Rositano, Florencia
    Omar Ferraro, Diego
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 53 (03) : 606 - 619