Downside of a carbon tax for environment: Impact of information sharing

被引:17
|
作者
Nie Jia-Jia [1 ]
Shi Chun-Lai [1 ]
Xiong Yu [2 ]
Xia Sen-Mao [3 ]
Liang Jia-Min [4 ]
机构
[1] Southwest Jiaotong Univ, Sch Econ & Management, Chengdu 610031, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Surrey, Surrey Business Sch, Guildford GU2 7XH, England
[3] Coventry Univ, Business Sch, Coventry CV1 5FB, W Midlands, England
[4] Northumbria Univ, Newcastle Business Sch, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Supply chain management; Carbon emissions reduction; Carbon tax; Information sharing; LOOP SUPPLY CHAIN; DEMAND FORECAST; EMISSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.accre.2020.06.006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Motivated by the observation that firms invest in carbon emissions reduction to decrease the cost of carbon tax as governments in numerous countries increasingly implement carbon tax to improve the environment, and broad researcher and practitioner agreement that carbon tax implementation always benefits the environment. However, we find that a carbon tax may actually hurt the environment based on a stylized game model with a better-informed retailer (one who controls the demand information sharing with the manufacturer) and a manufacturer. In particular, we find that the carbon emissions reduction may harm the environment if the carbon tax is moderate or both the carbon tax and the demand fluctuation are high. We further reveal free-riding behavior by the retailer, who may enjoy more profit sharing from the supply chain in the presence of carbon emissions reduction. Based on these observations, we argue that a carbon tax does not always benefit the environment when a manufacturer who receives demand information from the retailer responds better to market uncertainty.
引用
收藏
页码:92 / 101
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION COMPARABILITY ON AGGRESSIVE TAX AVOIDANCE WITH RESPECT TO THE INFORMATION ENVIRONMENT
    Farhadi, Zahra
    [J]. EKONOMICHESKAYA POLITIKA, 2020, 15 (03): : 134 - 151
  • [2] THE DOWNSIDE OF RESOURCE SHARING
    OXLEY, A
    [J]. MARINE SCIENCE INFORMATION THROUGHOUT THE WORLD : SHARING THE RESOURCES, 1989, : 291 - 293
  • [3] CAN CARBON TAX COMPLEMENT EMISSION TRADING SCHEME? THE IMPACT OF CARBON TAX ON ECONOMY, ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT IN CHINA
    Lin, Boqiang
    Jia, Zhijie
    [J]. CLIMATE CHANGE ECONOMICS, 2020, 11 (03)
  • [4] Environment for spatial information sharing
    Tsuji, H
    Yamada, T
    Tamano, M
    Sobue, T
    Kitazawa, S
    [J]. DIGITAL CITIES: TECHNOLOGIES, EXPERIENCES, AND FUTURE PERSPECTIVES, 2000, 1765 : 314 - 325
  • [5] The Downside of Increased Cost Sharing
    Carroll, Aaron E.
    [J]. JAMA PEDIATRICS, 2014, 168 (07) : 606 - 607
  • [6] INFORMATION SHARING AND TAX COMPETITION AMONG GOVERNMENTS
    BACCHETTA, P
    ESPINOSA, MP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 39 (1-2) : 103 - 121
  • [7] Knowledge and information sharing in a closed information environment
    Hong, Choo
    Goh, Telvin
    Hooper, Val
    [J]. JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2009, 13 (02) : 21 - 34
  • [8] IMPACT OF INFORMATION SHARING OF REGIONAL ECOLOGICAL SUPPLY CHAIN ON CARBON EMISSION
    Tai, Li
    Liu Xiaofeng
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2020, 21 (01): : 366 - 375
  • [9] Information sharing in an interorganizational GIS environment
    Nedovic-Budic, Z
    Pinto, JK
    [J]. ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2000, 27 (03): : 455 - 474
  • [10] Correction to: Selfish Sharing? The Impact of the Sharing Economy on Tax Reporting Honesty
    Leslie Berger
    Lan Guo
    Tisha King
    [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2020, 167 : 207 - 207