Robust economic optimization of process design under uncertainty

被引:11
|
作者
Kang, JS [1 ]
Suh, MH [1 ]
Lee, TY [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Taejon 305701, South Korea
关键词
robustness measures; robust partial mean model; robust worst-case model; Pareto optimality; target value; process design;
D O I
10.1080/03052150310001627338
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In this study, ranges of model parameters are analyzed for robustness measures. In particular, the properties of partial mean and worst-case cost in robust optimization are investigated. The robust optimization models are considered as multiobjective problems having two objectives, the expected performance (i.e. expected cost) and a robustness measure (Suh, M. and Lee, T. ( 2001) Robust optimization method for the economic term in chemical process design and planning. Industrial & Engineering Chemical Research, 40, 5950 - 5959). The robust partial mean model is defined with objectives of expected value and partial mean. The robust worst-case model is defined with the objective of expected value and worst-case. They are proved to guarantee Pareto optimality, which should be satisfied for multiobjective optimization problems. A graphical representation of the meaningful parameter ranges is clearly defined with mathematical proofs. The robustness of the solutions is discussed, based on the analysis of the ranges of the parameters. Three meaningful ranges of the parameters are investigated to choose a proper target value for the robust partial mean model. The worst-case value obtained from the worst-case analysis is recommended as the most effective target value, in order to obtain the optimal solution in a tradeoff between robustness and optimality. The proposed analysis in this study is validated with examples in chemical process design problems.
引用
收藏
页码:51 / 75
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Robust optimization for process scheduling under uncertainty
    Li, Zukui
    Ierapetritou, Marianthi G.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (12) : 4148 - 4157
  • [2] An overview on robust design hybrid metamodeling: Advanced methodology in process optimization under uncertainty
    Parnianifard, Amir
    Azfanizam, A. S.
    Ariffin, M. K. A.
    Ismail, M. I. S.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING COMPUTATIONS, 2018, 9 (01) : 1 - 32
  • [3] Process design and maintenance optimization under uncertainty
    Vassiliadis, CG
    Pistikopoulos, EN
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 : S555 - S558
  • [4] Distributionally robust optimization for engineering design under uncertainty
    Kapteyn, Michael G.
    Willcox, Karen E.
    Philpott, Andy B.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2019, 120 (07) : 835 - 859
  • [5] Robust optimization for petrochemical network design under uncertainty
    Al-Qahtani, K.
    Elkamel, A.
    Ponnambalam, K.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2008, 47 (11) : 3912 - 3919
  • [6] Polymer flooding design and optimization under economic uncertainty
    AlSofi, Abdulkareem M.
    Blunt, Martin J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 124 : 46 - 59
  • [7] Robust optimization of a reactive semibatch distillation process under uncertainty
    Arellano-Garcia, H
    Martini, W
    Wendt, M
    Li, P
    Wozny, G
    [J]. EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING - 13, 2003, 14 : 551 - 556
  • [8] Data driven robust optimization of grinding process under uncertainty
    Inapakurthi, Ravi Kiran
    Pantula, Priyanka Devi
    Miriyala, Srinivas Soumitri
    Mitra, Kishalay
    [J]. MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2020, 35 (16) : 1870 - 1876
  • [9] Robustness criteria in process design optimization under uncertainty
    Bernardo, FP
    Pistikopoulos, EN
    Saraiva, PM
    [J]. COMPUTERS & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 23 : S459 - S462
  • [10] An optimization methodology for identifying robust process integration investments under uncertainty
    Svensson, Elin
    Berntsson, Thore
    Stromberg, Ann-Brith
    Patriksson, Michael
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (02) : 680 - 685