Use of Static or Articulating Spacers for Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty A Systematic Literature Review

被引:84
|
作者
Voleti, Pramod B. [1 ]
Baldwin, Keith D. [1 ]
Lee, Gwo-Chin [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Univ Penn, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
来源
关键词
2-STAGE REIMPLANTATION; REVISION;
D O I
10.2106/JBJS.L.01461
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The so-called gold standard for treatment of periprosthetic joint infection following total knee arthroplasty is two-stage reimplantation. However, it is unclear whether use of static or articulating antibiotic-impregnated spacers during the interim period between these two stages is superior. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of static and articulating spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty. Methods: A systematic review of the peer-reviewed literature indexed by MEDLINE and Embase was performed to identify studies reporting the outcomes of antibiotic spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty. Seven Level-III comparative studies and thirty-two Level-IV case series remained following the screening process. The data in these studies were extracted and aggregated to compare the reinfection rate, range of knee motion, functional scores, and complication rates between static and articulating spacers. Results: The two types of spacers demonstrated similar reinfection rates (7% for articulating and 12% for static, p = 0.2). However, the articulating spacers resulted in significantly greater range of knee motion after reimplantation (101 degrees for articulating and 91 degrees for static, p = 0.0002). Despite this difference in ultimate knee motion, functional scores in the treatment groups were similar. Rates of wound-related and spacer-related complications were similarly low with both types of spacers. Conclusions: Our review failed to identify a significant difference in the ability of static or articulating spacers to eradicate periprosthetic infection following total knee arthroplasty. Compared with static spacers, articulating spacers provided improved knee motion following reimplantation, although functional scores were similar in the two treatment groups. We encourage arthroplasty surgeons to consider both static and articulating spacers in the treatment of infection following total knee arthroplasty and to tailor treatment on the basis of patient-related factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1594 / 1599
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A Randomized Trial of Static and Articulating Spacers for the Treatment of Infection Following Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Nahhas, Cindy R.
    Chalmers, Peter N.
    Parvizi, Javad
    Sporer, Scott M.
    Berend, Keith R.
    Moric, Mario
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Austin, Matthew S.
    Deirmengian, Gregory K.
    Morris, Michael J.
    Della Valle, Craig J.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2020, 102 (09): : 778 - 787
  • [2] Systematic Review Comparing Static and Articulating Spacers Used for Revision of Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Pivec, Robert
    Naziri, Qais
    Issa, Kimona
    Banerjee, Samik
    Mont, Michael A.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (03): : 553 - U311
  • [3] Comparison of articulating and static spacers regarding infection with resistant organisms in total knee arthroplasty
    Chiang, En-Rung
    Su, Yu-Ping
    Chen, Tain-Hsiung
    Chiu, Fang-Yao
    Chen, Wei-Ming
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (04) : 460 - 464
  • [4] Articulating versus static spacers in revision total knee arthroplasty for sepsis
    Fehring, TK
    Odum, S
    Calton, TF
    Mason, JB
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2000, (380) : 9 - 16
  • [5] Articulating Vs. Static Antibiotic Impregnated Spacers in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Sepsis. A Systematic Review
    Guild, George N., III
    Wu, Baohua
    Scuderi, Giles R.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2014, 29 (03): : 558 - 563
  • [6] The use of spacers (static and mobile) in infection knee arthroplasty
    Mazzucchelli L.
    Rosso F.
    Marmotti A.
    Bonasia D.E.
    Bruzzone M.
    Rossi R.
    Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 2015, 8 (4) : 373 - 382
  • [7] Outcomes of Articulating Spacers With Autoclaved Femoral Components in Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection
    Goltz, Daniel E.
    Sutter, E. Grant
    Bolognesi, Michael P.
    Wellman, Samuel S.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (08): : 2595 - 2604
  • [8] Functional Advantage of Articulating Versus Static Spacers in 2-Stage Revision for Total Knee Arthroplasty Infection
    Freeman, Mark G.
    Fehring, Thomas K.
    Odum, Susan M.
    Fehring, Keith
    Griffin, William L.
    Mason, J. Bohannon
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2007, 22 (08): : 1116 - 1121
  • [9] Point/Counterpoint: Static vs Articulating Spacers-Static Spacers for Resection Arthroplasty of the Knee
    Bowman, Erik C.
    Malkani, Arthur L.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (03): : S35 - S39
  • [10] Patient Dissatisfaction Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Gunaratne, Rajitha
    Pratt, Dylan N.
    Banda, Joseph
    Fick, Daniel P.
    Khan, Riaz J. K.
    Robertson, Brett W.
    JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (12): : 3854 - 3860