Assessment time of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle

被引:29
|
作者
de Vries, M. [1 ]
Engel, B.
den Uijl, I. [2 ]
van Schaik, G. [2 ]
Dijkstra, T. [2 ]
de Boer, I. J. M. [1 ]
Bokkers, E. A. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ, Anim Prod Syst Grp, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] GD Anim Hlth Serv, Deventer, Netherlands
关键词
animal welfare; dairy cows; on-farm assessment; prediction; protocol; Welfare Quality (R); LYING BEHAVIOR; RELIABILITY; LAMENESS; IMPUTATION; INDICATOR; AGREEMENT; VARIABLES; SYSTEM; COWS;
D O I
10.7120/09627286.22.1.085
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The Welfare Quality (R) (WQ) protocols are increasingly used for assessing welfare of farm animals. These protocols are time consuming (about one day per farm) and, therefore, costly. Our aim was to assess the scope for reduction of on-farm assessment time of the WQ protocol for dairy cattle. Seven trained observers quantified animal-based indicators of the WQ protocol in 181 loose-housed and 13 tied Dutch dairy herds (herd size from 10 to 211 cows). Four assessment methods were used: avoidance distance at the feeding rack (ADF, 44 min); qualitative behaviour assessment (QBA, 25 min); behavioural observations (BO, 150 min); and clinical observations (CO, 132 min). To simulate reduction of on-farm assessment time, a set of WQ indicators belonging to one assessment method was omitted from the protocol. Observed values of omitted indicators were replaced by predictions based on WQ indicators of the remaining three assessment methods, resources checklist, and interview, thus mimicking the performance of the full WQ protocol. Agreement between predicted and observed values of WQ indicators, however, was low for ADF, moderate for QBA, slight to moderate for BO, and poor to moderate for CO. It was concluded that replacing animal-based WQ indicators by predictions based on remaining WQ indicators shows little scope for reduction of on-farm assessment time of the Welfare Quality (R) protocol for dairy cattle. Other ways to reduce on-farm assessment time of the WQ protocol for dairy cattle, such as the use of additional data or automated monitoring systems, should be investigated.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 93
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Assessment of animal welfare in dairy cattle farming - Evaluation of the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Gieseke, D.
    Lambertz, C.
    Traulsen, Imke
    Krieter, J.
    Gauly, M.
    [J]. ZUCHTUNGSKUNDE, 2014, 86 (01): : 58 - 70
  • [2] The correlation of Qualitative Behavior Assessments with Welfare Quality® protocol outcomes in on-farm welfare assessment of dairy cattle
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Wemelsfelder, F.
    Sandoe, P.
    Forkman, B.
    [J]. APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2013, 143 (01) : 9 - 17
  • [3] Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Sandoe, P.
    Forkman, B.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2014, 23 (01) : 81 - 94
  • [4] Development of a welfare assessment protocol and assessment of dairy cattle welfare in Haryana and Punjab states of Northern India
    Kamboj, M. L.
    Kumar, C.
    Mahla, V
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2022, 31 (04) : 545 - 555
  • [5] Qualitative assessment of dairy cattle welfare
    Napolitano, F.
    Girolami, A.
    Carlucci, A.
    Caporale, G.
    Musto, M.
    Braghieri, A.
    [J]. ITALIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2005, 4 : 278 - 278
  • [6] Can animal-based welfare assessment be simplified? A comparison of the Welfare Quality® protocol for dairy cattle and the simpler and less time-consuming protocol developed by the Danish Cattle Federation (vol 23, pg 81, 2014)
    Andreasen, S. N.
    Sandoe, P.
    Forkman, B.
    [J]. ANIMAL WELFARE, 2017, 26 (03)
  • [7] Description and factors of variation of the overall health score in French dairy cattle herds using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol
    Coignard, M.
    Guatteo, R.
    Veissier, I.
    des Roches, A. de Boyer
    Mounier, L.
    Lehebel, A.
    Bareille, N.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2013, 112 (3-4) : 296 - 308
  • [8] Welfare quality applied to the Brazilian dairy cattle
    Franchi, Guilherme Amorim
    Garcia, Paulo Rogerio
    Oliveira da Silva, Iran Jose
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR AND BIOMETEOROLOGY, 2014, 2 (02): : 60 - 65
  • [9] Using Expert Elicitation to Abridge the Welfare Quality® Protocol for Monitoring the Most Adverse Dairy Cattle Welfare Impairments
    Tuyttens, Frank A. M.
    de Graaf, Sophie
    Andreasen, Sine Norlander
    de Boyer des Roches, Alice
    van Eerdenburg, Frank J. C. M.
    Haskell, Marie J.
    Kirchner, Marlene K.
    Mounier, Luc.
    Kjosevski, Miroslav
    Bijttebier, Jo
    Lauwers, Ludwig
    Verbeke, Wim
    Ampe, Bart
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2021, 8
  • [10] Impact of Daily Grazing Time on Dairy Cow WelfareResults of the Welfare Quality® Protocol
    Wagner, Kathrin
    Brinkmann, Jan
    March, Solveig
    Hinterstoisser, Peter
    Warnecke, Sylvia
    Schueler, Maximilian
    Paulsen, Hans Marten
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2018, 8 (01):