Testing the validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Staden schizophrenia anxiety rating scale

被引:2
|
作者
Du, Chenyuan [1 ]
Chen, Jiayue [2 ]
Ma, Xiaoyan [3 ]
Tu, Wenzhen [1 ]
Chen, Langlang [1 ]
Liu, Jian [3 ]
Zhou, Dan [4 ]
Chen, Xinying [5 ]
Zhang, Jiulong [5 ]
Tian, Hongjun [2 ]
Zhuo, Chuanjun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Jiang, Deguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Wenzhou Seventh Peoples Hosp, Dept Psychiat, Wenzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nankai Univ, Tianjin Ctr Hosp 4, Affiliated Tianjin Ctr Hosp 4, Dept Psychiat, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[3] Tianjin Med Univ, Nankai Univ, Tianjin Anding Hosp, Affiliated Tianjin Anding Hosp,Dept Psychiat,Clin, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[4] Tianjin Med Univ, Nankai Univ, Tianjin Anding Hosp, Clin Hosp Mental Hlth,Dept Neuroimagine, Tianjin, Peoples R China
[5] Tianjin Med Univ, Nankai Univ, Tianjin Anding Hosp, Dept Nurse Management,Clin Hosp Mental Hlth,Affili, Tianjin, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY | 2022年 / 13卷
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
S-SARS; Chinese version; reliability; validity; anxiety; schizophrenia; SOCIAL ANXIETY; DISORDERS; DEPRESSION; PREVALENCE; SYMPTOMS; OUTPATIENTS; ONSET;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyt.2022.992745
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of anxiety disorders and their symptomatology in schizophrenic patients is important for prognosis and treatment. Measuring anxiety on the traditional anxiety assessment scales such as the Hamilton Anxiety Rating (HAMA) Scale or the self-rating depression scale (SAS) is challenging and often considered unsuitable for assessing anxiety symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The Staden schizophrenia anxiety rating scale (S-SARS) has been shown to reliably measure specified and undifferentiated anxiety in schizophrenia. The present study aims to test the reliability and validity of the S-SARS version, thereby facilitating Chinese psychiatrists in assessing anxiety symptoms in schizophrenic patients. A total of 300 patients meeting ICD-10 diagnostic criteria of schizophrenia were recruited by convenience sampling. We used the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to evaluate the structural validity of S-SARS and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to acquire the cutoff point of S-SARS to define the severity of anxiety. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's and Krippendorff's alpha scores. 1-week test-retest reliability was assessed using the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlation analysis with HAMA was used to determine the Chinese version of S-SARS criterion validity. We have the following results: Our version of S-SARS showed Cronbach's alpha score as 0.899, Krippendorff's alpha as 0.874, and a correlation coefficient of 0.852 between S-SARS and HAMA. The EPA demonstrated that the contribution rate of major factors was 69.45%. All the items of S-SARS were located in one factor and showed a high factor load (0.415-0.837). The correlation coefficient of S-SARS and HAMA was 0.852. Our results indicated that Chinese version of S-SARS showed good constructive validity and reliability. It also showed better criterion validity compared to HAMA. The S-SARS and its Chinese version can thus serve as an effective tool for assessing anxiety symptoms in patients with schizophrenia.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validity and Reliability of the Staden Schizophrenia Anxiety Rating Scale
    Van Staden, Werdie
    Dlagnekova, Antonia
    Naidu, Kalai
    [J]. DIAGNOSTICS, 2022, 12 (04)
  • [2] The Korean Version of the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale: Reliability and Validity
    Kang, Eun-Chan
    Kim, Sung-Jin
    Seo, Young-Soo
    Jung, Sung-Soo
    Seo, Beom-Joo
    Ryu, Jeoung-Whan
    Shim, Joo-Cheol
    Moon, Jung-Joon
    Jeon, Dong-Wook
    Park, Kyoung-Duck
    Jung, Do-Un
    [J]. PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 2017, 14 (02) : 141 - 149
  • [3] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    Tan Song
    Mu Hui-xia
    Zhao Lu
    Gao Yuan
    Lu Jia-meng
    Sri Chang-he
    Avinash, Chandra
    Wang Rui-hao
    Xu Yu-ming
    [J]. CHINESE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048
  • [4] A study of the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Dementia Rating Scale
    Chan, IHL
    Siu, AMH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2005, 17 (01) : 69 - 79
  • [5] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia
    TAN Song
    NIU Hui-xia
    ZHAO Lu
    GAO Yuan
    LU Jia-meng
    SHI Chang-he
    Chandra Avinash
    WANG Rui-hao
    XU Yu-ming
    [J]. 中华医学杂志(英文版), 2013, 126 (11) : 2045 - 2048
  • [6] The German Version of the Gaze Anxiety Rating Scale (GARS): Reliability and Validity
    Domes, Gregor
    Marx, Lisa
    Spenthof, Ines
    Heinrichs, Markus
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [7] Validity and Reliability of the Chinese Version of Robot Anxiety Scale in Chinese Adults
    Cai, Jie
    Sun, Yuxuan
    Niu, Chunling
    Qi, Wei
    Fu, Xurong
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 2024, 40 (13) : 3355 - 3364
  • [8] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents
    Xinyue Zhou
    Qian Xu
    Cándido J. Inglés
    María D. Hidalgo
    Annette M. La Greca
    [J]. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 2008, 39 : 185 - 200
  • [9] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia
    Xiao, Weidong
    Liu, Hao
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Liu, Qi
    Fu, Peixin
    Chen, Jingxu
    Wang, Xiaoping
    Wang, Gaohua
    Li, Lingzhi
    Shu, Liang
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2009, 43 (06): : 548 - 553
  • [10] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the social anxiety scale for adolescents
    Zhou, Xinyue
    Xu, Qian
    Ingles, Candido J.
    Hidalgo, Maria D.
    La Greca, Annette M.
    [J]. CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 39 (02) : 185 - 200