Chronic wound management: knowledge and practices of nurses

Background. Recommendations on chronic wound management have greatly evolved during the last years. Practice in the medical units of the Civil Hospital of Colmar (France) appears to controverse these recommendations. Since nurses have a central place in such cares, we conducted a management audit among those working in cliff rent departments, before organising an educational program. Methods. One hundred-and ten nurses (20 P. 100), randomly selected among the 546 concerned by chronic wounds working in the hospital were invited to participate in this audit composed Of 23 questions. Results. Participation rate was 72 P. loo. Response rates were higher than 80 p. 100 for 18 of 23 questions. The percentages below are those of the expressed answers. For 58 p. 100 of nurses executing the care after medical prescription, 31 P. loo did so without medical advice and 11 P. 100 in collaboration with a doctor. Five and 14 p. 100 respectively knew all the classical clinical characteristics of venous and arterial leg ulcers. Some important risk factors for pressure sores were not well known, and only 15 p. loo of nurses regularly used an evaluation scale of this risk. The massage-kneading of a stage 1 pressure ulcer was practised by 49 p. loo of nurses. Depending on the questions, 64 to 82 p. 100 of them routinely used antiseptics, and 82 P. 100 thought it was more important than compression for the healing of a venous leg ulcer. in more than one-third of the answers, the dressing of a chronic wound was described as sterile. Finally, if an average knowledge of hydrocolloids was observed, there was little on alginates, foams and hydrogels, with a majority of nurses avoiding to answer these questions. Comments. Although important is the management of chronic wounds, basic knowledge was insufficient to hope for the 'nurses' collaboration. Prevention policy of pressure sores was not optimal. There were discrepancies between local practices and actual knowledge. Knowledge of new dressings was inadequate, and there was a risk for limited clinical benefit. We believe the results would have been similar if the audit had conducted among the doctors. Hense, a vast educational program has been initiated.