Finite-Difference and Edge Finite-Element Approaches for Dynamic Micromagnetic Modeling

被引：0

作者：

Van de Wiele, Ben ^{[2
]}

Manzin, Alessandra ^{[1
]}

Bottauscio, Oriano ^{[1
]}

Chiampi, Mario ^{[3
]}

Dupre, Luc ^{[2
]}

Olyslager, Femke ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] INRIM, I-10135 Turin, Italy

[2] Univ Ghent, Elect Energy Syst & Automat Dept, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

[3] Politecn Torino, Dipartimento Ingn Elettr, I-10129 Turin, Italy

[4] Univ Ghent, Dept Informat Technol, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium

来源：

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS | 2008年 / 44卷 / 11期

关键词：

Finite-difference methods; finite-element methods; Landau-Lifshitz equation; magnetization reversal; thin films;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];

学科分类号：

0808 ; 0809 ;

摘要：

This paper presents the comparison between two different numerical schemes for the analysis of switching phenomena in magnetic thin films. The first one is based on the finite-difference computation of the Landau-Lifshitz equation and on the magnetostatic field evaluation by fast Fourier transforms. The second one handles the spatial discretization of the Landau-Lifshitz equation by the edge finite-element method and solves the Poisson equation for the magnetostatic field with a hybrid finite element/boundary element technique.

引用

页码：3137 / 3140

页数：4

共 50 条

[1] A FINITE-DIFFERENCE FINITE-ELEMENT APPROACH TO DYNAMIC SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTION MODELING
STEVENS, DJ
KRAUTHAMMER, T
[J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1988, 29 (02) : 199 - 205
[2] FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
MORTON, KW
[J]. COMPUTER PHYSICS COMMUNICATIONS, 1976, 12 (01) : 99 - 108
[3] FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS OF APPROXIMATION
WALSH, J
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1971, 323 (1553): : 155 - &
[4] FINITE-DIFFERENCE VERSUS FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
KOBUS, J
[J]. CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1993, 202 (1-2) : 7 - 12
[5] FINITE-ELEMENT AND FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHODS IN ENGINEERING
PERRONE, N
[J]. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1978, 100 (01): : 188 - 192
[6] Incorporating topography into 2D resistivity modeling using finite-element and finite-difference approaches
Erdogan, Erhan
Demirci, Ismail
Candansayar, Mehmet Emin
[J]. GEOPHYSICS, 2008, 73 (03) : F135 - F142
[7] The finite-difference and finite-element modeling of seismic wave propagation and earthquake motion
Moczo, P.
Kristek, J.
Galis, M.
Pazak, P.
Balazovjech, M.
[J]. ACTA PHYSICA SLOVACA, 2007, 57 (02) : 177 - 406
[8] A NUMERICAL COMPARISON OF THE FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS
RINKER, EA
SPRINGMAN, RA
LITTLE, RR
[J]. OHIO JOURNAL OF SCIENCE, 1985, 85 (02) : 82 - 82
[9] RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINITE-ELEMENT AND FINITE-DIFFERENCE METHODS
GRAY, WG
PINDER, GF
[J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1976, 10 (04) : 893 - 923
[10] A COMPARISON OF FINITE-DIFFERENCE AND FINITE-ELEMENT METHODS FOR CALCULATING FREE EDGE STRESSES IN COMPOSITES
BAULD, NR
GOREE, JG
TZENG, LS
[J]. COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1985, 20 (05) : 897 - 914

← 1 2 3 4 5 →