Multidecadal Growth of Western White Pine and Interior Douglas-Fir Following Site Preparation

被引:4
|
作者
Cherico, Jonathan R. [1 ]
Nelson, Andrew S. [1 ]
Jain, Teresa B. [2 ]
Graham, Russell T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Forest Rangeland & Fire Sci Dept, Moscow, ID 83844 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
来源
FORESTS | 2020年 / 11卷 / 05期
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
scalping; bedding; forest vegetation management; herbicide; Northern Idaho; COMPETING VEGETATION CONTROL; PONDEROSA PINE; HEIGHT GROWTH; MANAGEMENT; PLANTATIONS; BIOMASS; PRODUCTIVITY; STANDS;
D O I
10.3390/f11050509
中图分类号
S7 [林业];
学科分类号
0829 ; 0907 ;
摘要
Site preparation is used to favor seedling regeneration and establishment by enhancing growing conditions and increasing resource availability, yet few studies have compared different site preparation techniques on growth and yield of trees over multiple decades. We destructively sampled 34-year old trees of western white pine (Pinus monticolaDouglas ex D. Don) and Interior Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii(Mirb.) Franco var.glauca(Beissn.) Franco planted at two sites using a replicated experiment to test the effectiveness of different site preparation treatments: (1) no site preparation, (2) scalping, (3) bedding, and (4) bedding plus three years of competition control with herbicide. Growth and yield were compared among the treatments, and models of growth were developed for each species and treatment combination. The herbicide treatment was the only treatment that consistently improved growth and yield of both species resulting in 19%-30% gains in height, 43%-63% gains in diameter, and 31%-109% gains in stem volume by age 34. Height growth response to herbicide was sustained until age 14 for white pine and age 12 for Douglas-fir, while the diameter response was sustained until age 23 for white pine and 20 for Douglas-fir. The later peak in growth for white pine suggests a better response to treatment and that the species was able to maintain higher growth following crown closure. Both species exhibited a Type 2 growth response to herbicide, suggesting competition control resulted in sustained gains over time with associated age shifts of 8.5 and 9.7 years for white pine and 7.1 and 10.2 years for Douglas-fir, height and diameter, respectively. This compares to scalping and bedding which produced no detectable difference in growth compared to the control, and in some instances, reduced growth. In the Northern Rocky Mountains, moisture is most limiting. This is likely why trees showed the greatest response to competition control. Interestingly, this growth was sustained well beyond seedling establishment.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Site preparation alters biomass, root and ectomycorrhizal development of outplanted western white pine and Douglas-fir
    Harvey, AE
    PageDumroese, DS
    Jurgensen, MF
    Graham, RT
    Tonn, JR
    [J]. NEW FORESTS, 1996, 11 (03) : 255 - 270
  • [2] Site preparation alters soil distribution of roots and ectomycorrhizae on outplanted western white pine and Douglas-fir
    Harvey, AE
    PageDumroese, DS
    Jurgensen, MF
    Graham, RT
    Tonn, JR
    [J]. PLANT AND SOIL, 1997, 188 (01) : 107 - 117
  • [3] Site preparation alters soil distribution of roots and ectomycorrhizae on outplanted western white pine and Douglas-fir
    Alan E. Harvey
    Deborah S. Page-Dumroese
    Martin F. Jurgensen
    Russell T. Graham
    Jonalea R. Tonn
    [J]. Plant and Soil, 1997, 188 : 107 - 117
  • [4] Site preparation effects on Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine water relations following planting in a pinegrass-dominated clearcut
    Fleming, RL
    Black, TA
    Adams, RS
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 1996, 83 (1-2) : 47 - 60
  • [5] Water use of interior Douglas-fir
    Simpson, DG
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2000, 30 (04) : 534 - 547
  • [6] Allozyme variation in interior Douglas-fir: association with growth and resistance to western spruce budworm herbivory
    Chen, Z
    Kolb, TE
    Clancy, KM
    Hipkins, VD
    DeWald, LE
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 2001, 31 (10): : 1691 - 1700
  • [7] TREE-RING GROWTH OF INTERIOR DOUGLAS-FIR AFTER ONE YEAR DEFOLIATION BY DOUGLAS-FIR TUSSOCK MOTH
    ALFARO, RI
    SHEPHERD, RF
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 1991, 37 (03) : 959 - 964
  • [8] DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF DOUGLAS-FIR TUSSOCK MOTH AND WESTERN SPRUCE BUDWORM DEFOLIATION ON RADIAL GROWTH OF GRAND FIR AND DOUGLAS-FIR
    BRUBAKER, LB
    GREENE, SK
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE RECHERCHE FORESTIERE, 1979, 9 (01): : 95 - 105
  • [9] Radial growth response of Douglas-fir and grand fir to larval densities of the Douglas-fir tussock moth and the western spruce budworm
    Mason, RR
    Wickman, BE
    Paul, HG
    [J]. FOREST SCIENCE, 1997, 43 (02) : 194 - 205
  • [10] Risk rating systems for the Douglas-fir beetle in the interior western United States
    Dodds, Kevin J.
    Garman, Steven L.
    Ross, Darrell W.
    [J]. WESTERN JOURNAL OF APPLIED FORESTRY, 2006, 21 (04): : 173 - 177