GARCH in Mean Type Models for Wind Power Forecasting

被引:0
|
作者
Chen, Hao [1 ]
Wan, Qiulan [2 ]
Li, Fangxing [3 ]
Wang, Yurong [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Elect Power Co, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Southeast Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Tennessee, Knoxville, TN USA
关键词
ARMA; GARCH; PARCH; GARCH-M; PARCH-M; Wind Power Forecasting; Volatility Compensation Term; AUTOREGRESSIVE CONDITIONAL HETEROSCEDASTICITY; SPEED;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Wind power penetration to power system is increasing with a very fast speed. Study on wind power forecasting is beneficial to the stable operation and economic dispatch of power systems. To improve the forecasting performance of wind power, it is necessary to investigate on the intrinsic characteristics of wind power. As the most recognized characteristics of wind power, volatility and intermittency are widely concerned. In this paper, GARCH in mean (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity in mean) type models are presented for wind power forecasting, and the impacts of volatility and intermittency to wind power time series is modeled in the mean equation of the forecasting model. With the help of GARCH in mean effect curve, the negative impact of volatility to wind power is highlighted. By means of the Conditional Maximum Likelihood Estimation (CMLE) method, the parameters are estimated for all the proposed models. In case study, wind power forecasting based on the two types of proposed models are carried out using the historical coastal wind power data of East China. Compared with the time persistence model, Auto-regressive Moving Average (ARMA) model and GARCH model, the proposed GARCH in mean type models are validated to be effective and outperform the classical wind power forecasting models.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Component GARCH-M Type Models for Wind Power Forecasting
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Fangxing
    Wang, Yurong
    [J]. 2015 IEEE POWER & ENERGY SOCIETY GENERAL MEETING, 2015,
  • [2] Asymmetric GARCH type models for asymmetric volatility characteristics analysis and wind power forecasting
    Chen, Hao
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Tao, Yubo
    Tan, Fenglei
    [J]. PROTECTION AND CONTROL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 4 (01)
  • [3] Asymmetric GARCH type models for asymmetric volatility characteristics analysis and wind power forecasting
    Hao Chen
    Jianzhong Zhang
    Yubo Tao
    Fenglei Tan
    [J]. Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2019, 4
  • [4] Wind speed and wind power forecasting models
    Lydia, M.
    Kumar, G. Edwin Prem
    Akash, R.
    [J]. ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT, 2024,
  • [5] A Review of Wind Power Forecasting Models
    Wang, Xiaochen
    Guo, Peng
    Huang, Xiaobin
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SMART GRID AND CLEAN ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES (ICSGCE 2011), 2011, 12
  • [6] Markov-Switching GARCH and Mixture of GARCH-type Models for Accuracy in Forecasting
    Saqware, Godfrey Joseph
    Ismail, B.
    [J]. STATISTICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2022, 20 (01):
  • [7] Assessment of power curves in models of wind power forecasting
    de Aquino, Ronaldo R. B.
    de Albuquerque, Jonata C.
    Neto, Otoni Nobrega
    Lira, Milde M. S.
    Carvalho, Manoel A., Jr.
    Neto, Alcides Codeceira
    Ferreira, Aida A.
    [J]. 2016 INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS (IJCNN), 2016, : 3915 - 3922
  • [8] Wind power forecasting based on outlier smooth transition autoregressive GARCH model
    Chen, Hao
    Li, Fangxing
    Wang, Yurong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MODERN POWER SYSTEMS AND CLEAN ENERGY, 2018, 6 (03) : 532 - 539
  • [9] Wind power forecasting based on outlier smooth transition autoregressive GARCH model
    Hao CHEN
    Fangxing LI
    Yurong WANG
    [J]. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2018, 6 (03) : 532 - 539
  • [10] Improved Wind Power Forecasting with ARIMA Models
    Hodge, Bri-Mathias
    Zeiler, Austin
    Brooks, Duncan
    Blau, Gary
    Pekny, Joseph
    Reklatis, Gintaras
    [J]. 21ST EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER AIDED PROCESS ENGINEERING, 2011, 29 : 1789 - 1793