Trust in Elections

被引:5
|
作者
Stewart, Charles, III [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Polit Sci, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
NATIONAL ELECTIONS; VOTER CONFIDENCE; INSTITUTIONALIZATION;
D O I
10.1162/daed_a_01953
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
The sometimes violent movement to reject the outcome of the 2020 U.S. presidential election draws our attention to the topic of trust in the institution of American election administration. An examination of this topic must make an important distinction between trust in elections (a psychological construct) and the trustworthiness of election results (a legal construct). The history of election administration in the United States is full of examples of efforts to increase the trustworthiness of elections to ensure that results are based on fair and competent administration. The resilience of these efforts was on display following the 2020 election, as formal institutions rejected claims that the election was fraudulent. Still, the past two decades have seen a decline in trust in American elections that has primarily been driven by a slow but steady decline in trust among Republicans. Surprisingly, the increased polarization in trust most recently has been due more to Democrats suddenly becoming more trusting. Election officials must continue to try to overcome attacks on trust in the system, but it is unclear how long they can sustain the legal system guaranteeing free and fair elections without broad-based public trust in how we administer elections.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 253
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Global Crisis of Trust in Elections
    Kerr, Nicholas
    King, Bridgett A.
    Wahman, Michael
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2024, 88 (SI) : 451 - 471
  • [2] THE ROLE OF CONSTITUENT TRUST IN CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS
    PARKER, GR
    [J]. LEGISLATIVE STUDIES QUARTERLY, 1988, 13 (01) : 136 - 136
  • [3] THE ROLE OF CONSTITUENT TRUST IN CONGRESSIONAL ELECTIONS
    PARKER, GR
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1989, 53 (02) : 175 - 196
  • [4] Public trust in elections: the case of Zanzibar
    Jørgen Elklit
    Alexander Makulilo
    Rodrick Henry
    [J]. SN Social Sciences, 4 (4):
  • [5] Trust Implications of DDoS Protection in Online Elections
    Culnane, Chris
    Eldridge, Mark
    Essex, Aleksander
    Teague, Vanessa
    [J]. ELECTRONIC VOTING (E-VOTE-ID 2017), 2017, 10615 : 127 - 145
  • [6] Vote Buying, Norms, Context, and Trust in Elections
    Cohen, Mollie J.
    Noh, Euiyoung Emily
    Zechmeister, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. COMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, 2024,
  • [7] Elections as a democratic linkage mechanism: How elections boost political trust in a proportional system
    Hooghe, Marc
    Stiers, Dieter
    [J]. ELECTORAL STUDIES, 2016, 44 : 46 - 55
  • [8] Tweet to Trust: Social Media and Elections in West Africa
    Smyth, Thomas N.
    Best, Michael L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES AND DEVELOPMENT, VOL 1, 2013, : 133 - 141
  • [9] Increasing Trust in Elections via a Simple Receipt Algorithm
    Mello-Stark, Suzanne
    Lamagna, Edmund A.
    [J]. 2015 IEEE 29TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCED INFORMATION NETWORKING AND APPLICATIONS WORKSHOPS WAINA 2015, 2015, : 529 - 534
  • [10] Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections:: The Canadian case
    Bélanger, É
    Nadeau, R
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2005, 44 (01) : 121 - 146