One-Year Follow-Up of Treatment With Once-Daily Tacrolimus in De Novo Renal Transplant

被引:10
|
作者
Kitada, Hidehisa [1 ]
Okabe, Yasuhiro [1 ]
Nishiki, Takehiro [1 ]
Miura, Yoshifumi [1 ]
Kurihara, Kei [1 ]
Terasaka, Soushi [1 ]
Kawanami, Sayako [1 ]
Tuchimoto, Akihiro [2 ]
Masutani, Kohsuke [3 ]
Tanaka, Masao [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Surg & Oncol, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Med & Clin Sci, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Kidney Care Unit, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
关键词
Prolonged-release; Trough levels; Renal function; Rejection rates; TWICE-DAILY TACROLIMUS; ACUTE REJECTION; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; DAILY PROGRAF; RECIPIENTS; CYCLOSPORINE; NONCOMPLIANCE; IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS; PHARMACOKINETICS;
D O I
10.6002/ect.2012.0087
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: The once-daily prolonged-release formulation of tacrolimus (tacrolimus QD) is expected to demonstrate equivalent efficacy and safety to the twice-daily formulation (tacrolimus BID). We reviewed the 1-year outcomes of tacrolimus QD in de novo renal transplant. Materials and Methods: We reviewed 50 de novo renal transplant patients assigned in a nonrandomized fashion to either tacrolimus QD (n = 23, historic control group) or tacrolimus BID (n = 27). Other immunosuppressive drugs used in both groups included mycophenolate mofetil, basiliximab, and steroids. We evaluated trough levels, required dosages, renal function, rejection rates, and episodes of infection within 1 year after transplant. Results: Trough levels of both drugs varied during the perioperative periods, but subsequently stabilized in both groups. There was a tendency toward a slow elevation and a higher dosage requirement in the tacrolimus QD group, compared with the tacrolimus BID group in the early stages, though the required dosages decreased steadily. The rejection rate in the tacrolimus QD group was low, and only 1 patient experienced subclinical rejection. No severe infectious adverse events were observed. Conclusions: Patients taking tacrolimus QD tended to have lower trough levels and require higher dosages than those taking tacrolimus BID during the early posttransplant period, though the differences decreased with increasing time after transplant. Tacrolimus QD can be administered with excellent efficacy and safety in de novo renal transplant recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:561 / 567
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Two-year follow-up of a once daily modified release tacrolimus regimen in de novo liver transplant recipients
    Fischer, Lutz
    Trunecka, Pavel
    Gridelli, Bruno
    Roy, Andre
    D'Amico, Davide
    Valdivieso, Andres
    Varo, Evaristo
    Langrehr, Jan
    Lynch, Stephen
    Samuel, Didier
    Ericzon, Bo-Goeran
    Boudjema, Karim
    McCaughan, Geoffrey
    Margreiter, Raimund
    Tchervenko, Jean
    Scudamore, Charles
    Magarit, Carlos
    Pageaux, Georges-Philippe
    O'Grady, John
    Baeckman, Lars
    Meurisse, Michel
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 87 - 87
  • [2] Two-year follow-up of a once daily modified release tacrolimus regimen in DE NOVO kidney transplant recipients
    Wlodarczyk, Zbigniew
    Squifflet, Jean-Paul
    Ostrowski, Marek
    Ancona, Ermanno
    Stefoni, Sergio
    Castagneto, Marco
    Vanrenterghem, Yves
    Kraemer, Bernhard
    Oppenheimer, Federico
    Abramowicz, Daniel
    Pietruck, Frank
    Russ, Graeme
    Neumayer, Hans
    Clavien, Pierre
    Heemann, Uwe
    Villafruela, Juan Jose
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2007, 20 : 27 - 27
  • [3] Clinical experience with once-daily tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplant recipients from living donors in Japan: 1-year follow up
    Ishida, Kenichiro
    Ito, Shinichi
    Tsuchiya, Tomohiro
    Imanishi, Yoshinori
    Deguchi, Takashi
    [J]. CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 66 (03) : 344 - 349
  • [4] De novo immunosuppression with sirolimus and tacrolimus in heart transplant recipients compared with cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil: A one-year follow-up analysis
    Zucker, MJ
    Baran, DA
    Arroyo, LH
    Goldstein, DJ
    Neacy, C
    Mele, L
    Weinberg, AD
    Prendergast, TW
    Ribner, HS
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (05) : 2231 - 2239
  • [5] Trough Level and Tacrolimus Variability of Early Converted Once-Daily Tacrolimus: 1-Year Follow-up Study
    Sukkha, Sayamon
    Suansanae, Thanarat
    Iamrahong, Pansa
    Wiwattanathum, Punlop
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (03) : 775 - 779
  • [6] A Comparative Analysis of Once-daily and Twice-daily Formulation of Tacrolimus in De Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Ferhatoglu, Murat Ferhat
    Kartal, Abdulcabbar
    Kivilcim, Taner
    Filiz, Ali Ilker
    Yildiz, Gursel
    Gurkan, Alp
    [J]. MEDICAL BULLETIN OF SISLI ETFAL HOSPITAL, 2021, 55 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [7] Conversion from Twice-Daily Tacrolimus to Once-Daily Tacrolimus in Pediatric Renal Transplant
    Salas, P.
    Pinto, V.
    Corbalan, H.
    [J]. PEDIATRIC NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 25 (09) : 1897 - 1898
  • [8] MELTDOSE® TECHNOLOGY VERSUS ONCE-DAILY PROLONGED RELEASE TACROLIMUS IN DE NOVO LIVER TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    Baccarani, Umberto
    Pravisani, Riccardo
    Lorenzin, Dario
    Adani, Gian Luigi
    Cherchi, Vittorio
    Velkoski, Jaqueline
    Falzone, Bruno
    Baraldo, Massimo
    Risaliti, Andrea
    [J]. TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 330 - 330
  • [9] MeltDose Technology vs Once-Daily Prolonged Release Tacrolimus in De Novo Liver Transplant Recipients
    Baccarani, Umberto
    Velkoski, Jaqueline
    Pravisani, Riccardo
    Adani, Gian Luigi
    Lorenzin, Dario
    Cherchi, Vittorio
    Falzone, Bruno
    Baraldo, Massimo
    Risaliti, Andrea
    [J]. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2019, 51 (09) : 2971 - 2973
  • [10] Effectiveness and safety of once-daily tacrolimus formulations in de novo liver transplant recipients: The PRETHI study
    Bilbao, Itxarone
    Bravo, Miguel Angel Gomez
    Otero, Alejandra
    Llado, Laura
    Montero, Jose Luis
    Dieguez, Luisa Gonzalez
    Graus, Javier
    Minano, Jose Antonio Pons
    [J]. CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (12)