How socio-ecological factors influence the differentiation of social relationships: an integrated conceptual framework

被引:14
|
作者
Moscovice, Liza R. [1 ]
Sueur, Cedric [2 ,3 ]
Aureli, Filippo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Leibniz Inst Farm Anim Biol, Inst Behav Physiol, Dummerstorf, Germany
[2] Univ Strasbourg, Dept Ecol Physiol & Ethol, CNRS, IPHC,UMR 7178, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[3] Inst Univ France, Paris, France
[4] Univ Veracruzana, Inst Neuroetol, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
[5] Liverpool John Moores Univ, Res Ctr Evolutionary Anthropol & Palaeoecol, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
关键词
group living; social complexity; competition; cooperation; information sharing; pathogen transmission; FISSION-FUSION DYNAMICS; ADAPTIVE VALUE; PLAINS ZEBRA; LEADERSHIP; BEHAVIOR; BABOONS; MONKEYS; FRIENDSHIPS; EVOLUTION; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1098/rsbl.2020.0384
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The extent of differentiation of social relationships within groups is a means to assess social complexity, with greater differentiation indicating greater social complexity. Socio-ecological factors are likely to influence social complexity, but no attempt has been made to explain the differentiation of social relationships using multiple socio-ecological factors. Here, we propose a conceptual framework based on four components underlying multiple socio-ecological factors that influence the differentiation of social relationships: the extent of within-group contest competition to access resources, the extent to which individuals differ in their ability to provide a variety of services, the need for group-level cooperation and the constraints on social interactions. We use the framework to make predictions about the degree of relationship differentiation that can be expected within a group according to the cumulative contribution of multiple socio-ecological factors to each of the four components. The framework has broad applicability, since the four components are likely to be relevant to a wide range of animal taxa and to additional socio-ecological factors not explicitly dealt with here. Hence, the framework can be used as the basis for the development of novel and testable hypotheses about intra- and interspecific differences in relationship differentiation and social complexity.
引用
下载
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Vulnerability of socio-ecological systems: A conceptual Framework
    Maria Berrouet, Lina
    Machado, Jenny
    Villegas-Palacio, Clara
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2018, 84 : 632 - 647
  • [2] Social relationships with nature: elements of a framework for socio-ecological structure analysis
    Eversberg, Dennis
    Koch, Philip
    Holz, Jana
    Pungas, Lilian
    Stein, Anne
    INNOVATION-THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2022, 35 (03) : 389 - 419
  • [3] A conceptual framework for understanding forest socio-ecological systems
    Felix Kanungwe Kalaba
    Biodiversity and Conservation, 2014, 23 : 3391 - 3403
  • [4] A conceptual framework for understanding forest socio-ecological systems
    Kalaba, Felix Kanungwe
    BIODIVERSITY AND CONSERVATION, 2014, 23 (14) : 3391 - 3403
  • [5] The Water Metabolism of Socio-Ecological Systems: Reflections and a Conceptual Framework
    Madrid-Lopez, Cristina
    Giampietro, Mario
    JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 19 (05) : 853 - 865
  • [6] A socio-ecological framework of social justice leadership in education
    Berkovich, Izhak
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2014, 52 (03) : 282 - +
  • [7] The Socio-Ecological Factors that Influence the Adoption of Green Infrastructure
    Tayouga, Sarah J.
    Gagne, Sara A.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (12)
  • [8] Reducing socio-ecological conflict using social influence modelling
    Condie, Corrine M.
    Alexander, Karen A.
    Fulton, Elizabeth A.
    Vince, Joanna
    Condie, Scott A.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [9] Socio-Ecological Attunement: Social Attitudes Influence the Detection of Affordances
    Meagher, Benjamin R.
    ECOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2024,
  • [10] Reducing socio-ecological conflict using social influence modelling
    Corrine M. Condie
    Karen A. Alexander
    Elizabeth A. Fulton
    Joanna Vince
    Scott A. Condie
    Scientific Reports, 12