Monitoring Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Primary Osteosarcoma Using Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Initial Findings

被引:15
|
作者
Liu, Chenglei [1 ]
Xi, Yan [1 ]
Li, Mei [1 ]
Jiao, Qiong [2 ]
Zhang, Huizhen [2 ]
Yang, Qingcheng [3 ]
Yao, Weiwu [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Radiol, 600 Yi Shan Rd, Shanghai 200233, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Pathol, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Affiliated Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Orthoped, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bone neoplasm; Functional MRI; Diffusion; Treatment; HISTOLOGICAL RESPONSE; OSTEOGENIC-SARCOMA; TUMOR NECROSIS; WATER; MRI;
D O I
10.3348/kjr.2018.0453
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) is effective in monitoring tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma. Materials and Methods: Twenty-nine osteosarcoma patients (20 men and 9 women; mean age, 17.6 +/- 7.8 years) who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DKI before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were included. Tumor volume, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), mean diffusivity (MD), mean kurtosis (MK), and change ratio (Delta X) between preand post-treatment were calculated. Based on histologic response, the patients were divided into those with good response >= 90% necrosis, n = 12) and those with poor response (< 90% necrosis, n = 17). Several MRI parameters between the groups were compared using Student's t test. The correlation between image indexes and tumor necrosis was determined using Pearson's correlation, and diagnostic performance was compared using receiver operating characteristic curves. Results: In good responders, MDpost, ADC(post), and MKpost, values were significantly higher than in poor responders (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.042, respectively). The Delta MD and Delta ADC were also significantly higher in good responders than in poor responders (p < 0.001 and p = 0.01, respectively). However, no significant difference was observed in Delta MK (p = 0.092). and Delta MD showed high correlations with tumor necrosis rate (r = 0.669 and r = 0.622, respectively), and MDpost had higher diagnostic performance than ADC(post) (p = 0.037) and MKpost (p = 0.011). Similarly, Delta MD also showed higher diagnostic performance than Delta ADC (p = 0.033) and Delta MK (p = 0.037). Conclusion: MD is a promising biomarker for monitoring tumor response to preoperative chemotherapy in patients with osteosarcoma.
引用
收藏
页码:801 / 811
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of Synovitis of Hand in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis Using Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Initial Findings
    Liu, Kaifang
    Meng, Jie
    Zhou, Nan
    Zhao, Cheng
    Wei, Yu
    He, Jian
    Chen, Weibo
    Sun, Lingyun
    Zhou, Zhengyang
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2021, 45 (04) : 557 - 563
  • [2] Tumour response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging as prognostic factor for outcome
    Christoph J. Laux
    Gundula Berzaczy
    Michael Weber
    Susanna Lang
    Martin Dominkus
    Reinhard Windhager
    Iris-Melanie Nöbauer-Huhmann
    Philipp T. Funovics
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 97 - 104
  • [3] Tumour response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging as prognostic factor for outcome
    Laux, Christoph J.
    Berzaczy, Gundula
    Weber, Michael
    Lang, Susanna
    Dominkus, Martin
    Windhager, Reinhard
    Noebauer-Huhmann, Iris-Melanie
    Funovics, Philipp T.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [4] How to explain the role of magnetic resonance imaging on evaluating tumour response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Hui Li
    Xiao-yang Li
    Jie Bu
    Tao Xiao
    International Orthopaedics, 2015, 39 : 1031 - 1032
  • [5] How to explain the role of magnetic resonance imaging on evaluating tumour response of osteosarcoma to neoadjuvant chemotherapy?
    Li, Hui
    Li, Xiao-yang
    Bu, Jie
    Xiao, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2015, 39 (05) : 1031 - 1032
  • [6] Integrating dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging for neoadjuvant chemotherapy assessment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma
    Zheng, Dechun
    Lai, Guojing
    Chen, Ying
    Yue, Qiuyuan
    Liu, Xiangyi
    Chen, Xiaodan
    Chen, Weibo
    Chan, Queenie
    Chen, Yunbin
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 48 (05) : 1208 - 1216
  • [7] Diffusion Kurtosis Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Oropharyngeal Cancer in Response to Chemoradiotherapy
    Ding, Y.
    Mohamed, A.
    Wang, J.
    Frank, S.
    Ma, J.
    Fuller, C.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 2984 - 2984
  • [8] Response Monitoring to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Osteosarcoma Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
    Bu-Tian Zhang
    Qian Zheng
    Lin Liu
    Yan-Ni Zeng
    Yi-Meng Dai
    Jin-Lan Jiang
    Kai-ming Xue
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine, 2019, 1 (5) : 319 - 327
  • [9] Relevance of breast cancer subtypes for magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Gomez-Raposo, Cesar
    Andreu, Monica
    Suarez-Garcia, Ines
    Isabel Esteban, M.
    Carballo, Mar
    Sereno-Moyano, Maria F.
    Vazquez Osorio, Jose L.
    Heras, Javier
    Zambrana Tevar, Francisco
    Pelayo, Eva
    Lopez-Gomez, Miriam
    Garcia de Santiago, Clara
    Merino Salvador, Maria
    Casado, Enrique
    CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 14 (06): : 486 - 488
  • [10] Relevance of breast cancer subtypes for magnetic resonance imaging response monitoring during neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Cesar Gómez-Raposo
    Mónica Andreu
    Inés Suárez-García
    M. Isabel Esteban
    Mar Carballo
    María F. Sereno-Moyano
    José L. Vázquez Osorio
    Javier Heras
    Francisco Zambrana Tévar
    Eva Pelayo
    Miriam López-Gómez
    Clara García de Santiago
    María Merino Salvador
    Enrique Casado
    Clinical and Translational Oncology, 2012, 14 : 486 - 488