Intersections between collaborative governance and communicative action: an analytical proposal

被引:0
|
作者
Sant'Anna, Lindsay Teixeira [1 ,2 ]
Alcantara, Valderi de Castro [3 ]
Pereira, Jose Roberto [1 ]
Alves Cappelle, Monica Carvalho [1 ]
Tonelli, Dany Flavio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Lavras, Dept Adm & Econ, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[2] Fac Adventista Minas Gerais, Lavras, MG, Brazil
[3] Univ Estado Minas Gerais, Unidade Claudio, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA | 2019年 / 53卷 / 05期
关键词
democracy; state-society relationships; communicative collaboration; CAPACITY; POWER; PARTICIPATION; DELIBERATION; SIMULATION; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1590/0034-761220170400x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
The New Public Management failed to present significant changes in the patterns of relations between the centralizing state and society. This research proposes an analytical approach based on the interactions between collaborative governance (CG) and communicative action theory (CAT), in order to study communicative collaboration (CC) practices involving the state and society. When looking for intersections among the theoretical assumptions in CG and CAT, the study identified four theoretical constructs that contribute to a collaborative scenario: multiplicity of actors, interdependence, inclusive deliberative process, and seeking consensus. 'the findings based on cutting-edge CG theory and on Habermas' classic works demonstrate that CC assumptions enable environments conducive to inclusive social participation. The article argues that it is possible to build spaces conducive to communicative collaboration between the state and society, where there is equal participation among actors seeking shared understanding leading to practical solutions to public problems.
引用
收藏
页码:821 / 837
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Global governance and communicative action
    Risse, T
    [J]. GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2004, 39 (02) : 288 - 313
  • [2] Action and inertia in collaborative governance
    Kossmann, Christina M.
    Behagel, Jelle H.
    Bailey, Megan
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2016, 72 : 21 - 30
  • [3] Theorising partnerships: Governance, communicative action and sport policy
    McDonald, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 2005, 34 : 579 - 600
  • [4] Governance in business clusters: proposal for an application of an analytical model
    Cassanego Junior, Paulo Vanderlei
    Gama Boaventura, Joao Mauricio
    Azevedo, Ana Claudia
    Telles, Renato
    [J]. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 31 (9-10): : 984 - 1010
  • [5] Occupy the squares with tweets. A proposal for the analysis of the governance of communicative spaces.
    Ramon Rodriguez-Amat, Joan
    Brantner, Cornelia
    [J]. OBRA DIGITAL-REVISTA DE COMUNICACION, 2016, (11): : 1 - 19
  • [6] Planning theory in our own backyard - Communicative action in academic governance
    Willson, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2003, 22 (03) : 297 - 307
  • [7] Towards a collaborative teaching/learning dynamic within the communicative action approach
    Baquero, Fanny
    Dupont, Pascal
    [J]. LANGUAGE LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2022, 12 (01) : 29 - 55
  • [8] Between structure and action: the communicative skill of ICT
    Agostinelli, Serge
    [J]. QUESTIONS VIVES-RECHERCHES EN EDUCATION, 2010, 7 (14): : 161 - 174
  • [9] Exploring the relationship between law and governance: a proposal
    Ciacchi, Aurelia Colombi
    von der Pfordten, Dietmar
    [J]. THEORY AND PRACTICE OF LEGISLATION, 2023, 11 (02): : 151 - 167
  • [10] 'The best argument', communicative action and social classes. A critique of Habermas' proposal
    Malo, Enrico Mora
    [J]. ATHENEA DIGITAL, 2005, (07): : 16 - 39