Transcervical foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an outpatient versus inpatient setting

被引:71
|
作者
Sciscione, AC
Muench, M
Pollock, M
Jenkins, TM
Tildon-Burton, J
Colmorgen, GHC
机构
[1] Christiana Care Hlth Serv, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Newark, DE 19718 USA
[2] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19107 USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2001年 / 98卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(01)01579-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare use of the Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in an inpatient versus outpatient setting. METHODS. A randomized trial was conducted from May 1998 to December 1999. Women with a term gestation in the vertex presentation, a reactive nonstress test, an amniotic fluid index above the fifth percentile, and a Bishop score of no more than 5 were included. The primary outcome variable was a change in Bishop score. A Foley catheter with a 30-mL balloon was placed through the cervix on gentle traction in each group. The outpatient group was then discharged home with written instructions and returned in the morning for induction. The inpatient group was admitted to labor and delivery, with induction started upon extrusion of the Foley. RESULTS: Sixty-one women were randomized into the outpatient group, and 50 women into the inpatient group. Maternal age, gravidity, previous cesarean delivery, and gestational age did not differ between the groups. The median Bishop score at entry was 3.0 for each group (P = .97). The mean change in Bishop scores after catheter placement was not different between the inpatient and outpatient groups (3.0 versus 3.0; P = .74). The maximum dose of oxytocin, time of oxytocin, epidural. rate, induction time, 1-minute and 5-minute Apgar scores, and cord pH were not significantly different. The outpatient group on average avoided 9.6 hours of hospitalization. There were no adverse events or maternal morbidity in either group. CONCLUSIONS: The Foley bulb is as effective in the outpatient as the inpatient setting for preinduction cervical ripening. (Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:751-6. (C) 2001 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists).
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 756
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Inpatient versus outpatient transcervical Foley catheter use for cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial
    Pierce-Williams, Rebecca
    Lesser, Henry
    Cohen, Isabelle
    Bauer, Monica
    Berghella, Vincenzo
    D'Adamo, Chris
    Ehsanipoor, Robert
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 226 (01) : S772 - S773
  • [2] A randomized comparison of transcervical Foley catheter to intravaginal misoprostol for preinduction cervical ripening
    Sciscione, AC
    Nguyen, L
    Manley, J
    Pollock, M
    Maas, B
    Colmorgen, G
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (04): : 603 - 607
  • [3] A prospective, randomized trial of transcervical foley catheter with or without oxytocin for preinduction cervical ripening
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Pocock, Sean B.
    Smok, Dorothy P.
    Devine, Patricia C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (06) : S27 - S27
  • [4] Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening: the FOG (Foley or Gel) trial
    Henry, A.
    Madan, A.
    Reid, R.
    Tracy, S.
    Sharpe, V
    Austin, K.
    Welsh, A.
    Challis, D.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (05): : 473 - 474
  • [5] Satisfaction survey: outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient Prostin gel for cervical ripening
    Henry, A.
    Reid, R.
    Madan, A.
    Tracy, S.
    Sharpe, V
    Welsh, A.
    Challis, D.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2011, 51 (05): : 474 - 474
  • [6] The Timing of Adverse Events with Foley Catheter Preinduction Cervical Ripening; Implications for Outpatient Use
    Sciscione, Anthony C.
    Bedder, Casey L.
    Hoffman, Matthew K.
    Ruhstaller, Kelly
    Shlossman, Phillip A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (09) : 781 - 785
  • [7] Cervical ripening with transcervical Foley catheter and the risk of uterine rupture
    Bujold, E
    Blackwell, SC
    Gauthier, RJ
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (01): : 18 - 23
  • [8] Intravaginal misoprostol versus transcervical Foley catheter in pre-induction cervical ripening
    Adeniji, AO
    Olayemi, O
    Odukogbe, AA
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) : 130 - 132
  • [9] The safety of the Foley catheter for preinduction cervical ripening in a low risk population
    Hoffman, Matthew
    Sciscione, Anthony
    Bedder, Casey
    Shlossman, Philip
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2011, 204 : S121 - S122
  • [10] PREINDUCTION CERVICAL RIPENING - A COMPARISON OF INTRACERVICAL PROSTAGLANDIN E(2) GEL VERSUS THE FOLEY CATHETER
    ONGE, RDS
    CONNORS, GT
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1995, 172 (02) : 687 - 690